| Literature DB >> 23067578 |
Glenn Hernandez1, Tomas Regueira, Alejandro Bruhn, Ricardo Castro, Maximiliano Rovegno, Andrea Fuentealba, Enrique Veas, Dolores Berrutti, Jorge Florez, Eduardo Kattan, Celeste Martin, Can Ince.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Recent clinical studies have confirmed the strong prognostic value of persistent hyperlactatemia and delayed lactate clearance in septic shock. Several potential hypoxic and nonhypoxic mechanisms have been associated with persistent hyperlactatemia, but the relative contribution of these factors has not been specifically addressed in comprehensive clinical physiological studies. Our goal was to determine potential hemodynamic and perfusion-related parameters associated with 6-hour lactate clearance in a cohort of hyperdynamic, hyperlactatemic, septic shock patients.Entities:
Year: 2012 PMID: 23067578 PMCID: PMC3488533 DOI: 10.1186/2110-5820-2-44
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Ann Intensive Care ISSN: 2110-5820 Impact factor: 6.925
Baseline characteristics of 15 hyperdynamic septic shock patients according to a 6-hour lactate clearance higher or lower than 10%
| | |||||||||||||||||||||
| 1 | 26 | No | Peritonitis | 10 | 24 | 66 | 68 | 6 | 8 | 0.11 | 0.05 | 9 | 9 | 2.4 | 1.6 | - | - | 24.6 | 32 | 2.8 | 2.3 |
| 2 | 66 | Yes | Unknown | 9 | 24 | 76 | 68 | 2 | 2 | 0.21 | 0.17 | 11 | 10 | 3.4 | 2.8 | 6.1 | 7.1 | 28.2 | 27.8 | 2.5 | 2.9 |
| 3 | 83 | Yes | Respiratory | 10 | 19 | 78 | 77 | 0 | 0 | 0.1 | 0.05 | 13 | 11 | 4.5 | 1.5 | 2.1 | 58.7 | 13.3 | 18.1 | 1.4 | 1.8 |
| 4 | 56 | Yes | Peritonitis | 9 | 25 | 82 | 67 | 8 | 29 | 0.09 | 0.12 | 18 | 21 | 3 | 2 | 5.3 | 4.6 | 19.9 | 17.7 | 2.3 | 1.8 |
| 5 | 83 | No | Peritonitis | 8 | 23 | 72 | 65 | 5 | 5 | 0.26 | 0.45 | 4 | 8 | 19 | 16.2 | 0 | 0.1 | - | - | 2.2 | 1.9 |
| 6 | 97 | Yes | Peritonitis | 8 | 25 | 86 | 68 | 10 | 17 | 0.25 | 0.14 | 9 | 20 | 2.5 | 1.8 | 8.3 | 16.7 | 28 | 31.1 | 2.5 | 2 |
| 7 | 66 | Yes | Peritonitis | 8 | 23 | 66 | 68 | 6 | 8 | 0.43 | 0.7 | 16 | 9 | 3.1 | 2.5 | 4.7 | 2.3 | 20.8 | 19.6 | 1.4 | 1.9 |
| 8 | 67 | Yes | Peritonitis | 13 | 20 | 75 | 70 | 8 | 7 | 0.21 | 0.23 | 14 | 15 | 4.9 | 3.3 | 6.2 | 9.3 | 19 | 23.3 | 2.2 | 2.3 |
| 9 | 69 | Yes | Skin | 13 | 16 | 72 | 71 | 10 | 16 | 0.25 | 0.34 | 6 | 13 | 3.5 | 2.9 | 10.7 | 7.7 | 11.7 | 9 | 1.3 | 2.5 |
| 10 | 71 | Yes | Peritonitis | 15 | 42 | 73 | 75 | 8 | 6 | 0.3 | 0.46 | 10 | 11 | 6.2 | 5.4 | 5 | 18.1 | - | - | 1.2 | 1.3 |
| | |||||||||||||||||||||
| 11 | 76 | Yes | Unknown | 13 | 36 | 72 | 72 | 5 | 2 | 0.08 | 0.08 | 11 | 15 | 2.8 | 2.7 | 5.9 | 9.1 | 14.4 | 9.7 | 1.9 | 2.1 |
| 12 | 58 | Yes | Skin | 19 | 38 | 64 | 64 | 4 | 2 | 0.4 | 0.65 | 18 | 18 | 4.9 | 5.6 | 23.9 | 52.5 | 19.5 | 8.1 | 2.2 | 2.9 |
| 13 | 73 | Yes | Peritonitis | 7 | 25 | 110 | 69 | 3,4 | 2 | 0.1 | 0.06 | 12 | 13 | 4.2 | 3.8 | 8.1 | 12 | 19 | 19 | 1.5 | 1.5 |
| 14 | 67 | Yes | Peritonitis | 15 | 29 | 69 | 70 | 0 | 0 | 0.03 | 0.05 | 7 | 8 | 2.5 | 2.5 | 61.6 | 62.9 | 9.8 | 11.3 | 1.0 | 1.8 |
| 15 | 56 | Yes | Respiratory | 8 | 19 | 73 | 92 | 9 | 5 | 0.1 | 0.08 | 9 | 6 | 2.8 | 3.2 | 10.8 | 33 | 8.4 | 7.8 | 1.9 | 1.9 |
Pt, patient; Survival, hospital survival; APACHE II, Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II; IAP, intra-abdominal pressure (mmHg); SOFA, Sequential Organ Failure Assessment; MAP, mean arterial pressure (mmHg), ∆PP, Pulse pressure variation (%), NE, norepinephrine requirements (mcg/kg/min); lactate, (mmol/l); MFI, microcirculatory flow index; CO2 gap, gastric/arterial pCO2 gradient (mmHg); PDR, indocyanine green plasma disappearance rate (%min).
Figure 1Evolution of gastric-to-arterial pCOgradients (pCOgap in mmHg) and indocyanine green plasma disappearance rates (ICG-PDR in%/min) in patients exhibiting a 6-hour lactate clearance ≥ or <10%. Patients with lower lactate clearance rates exhibited a significant increase in pCO2 gap and a decrease in ICG-PDR.
Multiparametric comparison between patients with a lactate clearance higher or lower than 10%
| | | | | | ||
| Pulse pressure variation (%) | 7 (0–10) | 7 (0–12) | 4 (0–9) | 2 (0–5)b | ||
| MAP (mmHg) | 74 (66–86) | 68 (65–77) | 72 (64–90) | 70 (64–90) | ||
| PAOP (mmHg) | 14 (9–19) | 11 (6–16) | 16 (9–21) | 13 (6–18) | ||
| CVP (mmHg) | 13 (9–23) | 13 (4–16) | 13 (9–23) | 12 (5–14) | ||
| Heart rate (bpm) | 97 (80–119) | 107 (65–132) | 86 (74–120) | 96 (74–136) | ||
| Cardiac index (l/min/m2) | 3.4 (2.5-4.7) | 4.1 (3–6.1) | 3.1 (27–4.3) | 4.2 (2.6-6.2) | ||
| APP (mmHg) | 66 (54–99) | 58 (48–64) | 62 (50–98) | 62 (48–86) | ||
| | | | | | | |
| PaCO2 (mmHg) | 35 (30–39) | 36 (30–38) | 35 (28–40) | 35 (31–39) | ||
| SvO2 (%) | 77 (65–91) | 77 (71–94) | 75 (66–79) | 73 (68–79) | ||
| P(cv-a)pCO2 (mmHg) | 4.3 (0.7-7) | 3.5 (0.2-6) | 6.3 (0.8-7.7) | 3.5 (1–3.8) | ||
| | | | | | | |
| CRT (s) | 3.5 (1–7) | 4 (2–6) | 5 (1–12) | 3 (1–12) | ||
| Central-peripheral temp. difference (°C) | 8.6 (5.2-12.2) | 6.5 (4–11.2) | 11.8 (2.6-14) | 10.5 (2.6-15.2) | ||
| | | | | | | |
| StO2 (%) | 84 (55–94) | 85 (77–95) | 74 (72–94) | 82 (69–95) | ||
| StO2 recovery slope (%/s) | 1.71 (0.4-4) | 2.35 (0.8-3.4) | 2.3 (0.4-7.6) | 0.9 (0.8-5.1) | ||
| | | | | | | |
| MFI (score) | 2.1 (1.3-2.8) | 1.95 (1.8-2.9) | 1.87 (1–2.2) | 1.92 (1.5-2.9) | ||
| Proportion of perfused vessels (%) | 78.9 (62–93) | 74.9 (67–99) | 73.9 (40.8-82) | 82.5 (71–92.1) | ||
| PVD (n/mm) | 8.7 (7.5-10.7) | 9.1 (6–11.3) | 7.9 (4.1-10.4) | 9 (7.2-10.7) | ||
| | | | | | | |
| ICG-PDR (%/min) | 19.9 (6.1-28) | 19.6 (9–32) | 14.4 (8.4-19) | 9.7 (8–19)* | ||
| pCO2 gap (mmHg) | 5.3 (2–10.7) | 7.7 (3–58) | 10.8 (5.9-61)* | 33 (9.1-62)* | ||
Data presented as median (range) unless otherwise indicated.
aWilcoxon test for paired measurements.
bp < 0.05 by Mann–Whitney test for independent measurements comparing final values between both subgroups.
MAP, mean arterial pressure; PAOP, pulmonary artery occlusion pressure; CVP, central venous pressure; APP, abdominal perfusion pressure; SvO2, mixed venous oxygen saturation; p(cv-a)CO2, mixed venous to arterial pCO2 gradient; CRT, capillary refill time; NIRS, near-infrared spectroscopy; StO2, tissue oxygen saturation; MFI, microcirculatory flow index; PVD, perfused vessel density; ICG-PDR, indocyanine green plasma disappearance rate; pCO2 gap, gastric to arterial pCO2 gradient.
Figure 2Correlation between pooled indocyanine green plasma disappearance rate (ICG-PDR) and gastric-to-arterial pCOgradient (pCOgap) values.