Barbara Wieser1, Alexander Tichy, Barbara Nell. 1. Department for Small Animals and Horses, Clinic for Surgery and Ophthalmology, University of Veterinary Medicine Vienna, Rautenkranzgasse 36/11, Vienna 1210, Austria. barbarawieser@gmx.at
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Guinea pigs have a very low threshold of corneal sensitivity and at the same time nearly no reflex tearing compared to dogs, cats, and horses. The question arose whether there is a general correlation between corneal sensitivity and the quantity of reflex tearing. ANIMALS STUDIED: Totally 160 animals of 8 different species (20 animals per species) were investigated. PROCEDURES: The corneal touch threshold (CTT) was measured with a Cochet-Bonnet esthesiometer. The palpebral fissure length (PFL) was measured with a calliper ruler. The Schirmer tear test (STT) was modified by adapting the width of the STT strip to the PFL of every species. For the STT II, 0.4% oxybuprocaine was applied. RESULTS: Corneal touch threshold: Cows (1.67 g/mm(2)), horses (1.23 g/mm(2)), sheep (1.13 g/mm(2)), goats (1.44 g/mm(2)), dogs (2.16 g/mm(2)), and cats (1.33 g/mm(2)) show similar CTT values. In contrast, rabbits (6.21 g/mm(2)) and guinea pigs (7.75 g/mm(2)) show a significantly lower CTT. Tear Production Difference STT I - STT II: Rabbits have the greatest decline in tear production with 38.4%, followed by sheep (33.3%), dogs (31.1%), cats (24.7%), cows (23.7%), horses (18.0%), and goats (14.0%). Guinea pigs have no decline, but a slight increase of -16.0%. Correlation CTT and STT II - STT I Difference: Pearson's correlation coefficient shows a small, but significant correlation. The coefficient of determination can only forecast a value with 7.1% certainty. CONCLUSIONS: The high variance and low reproducibility of results suggest that the measuring devices are inappropriate to assess the evaluated parameters. Therefore, no assured correlation between the corneal sensitivity and the quantity of reflex tearing could be found.
OBJECTIVE:Guinea pigs have a very low threshold of corneal sensitivity and at the same time nearly no reflex tearing compared to dogs, cats, and horses. The question arose whether there is a general correlation between corneal sensitivity and the quantity of reflex tearing. ANIMALS STUDIED: Totally 160 animals of 8 different species (20 animals per species) were investigated. PROCEDURES: The corneal touch threshold (CTT) was measured with a Cochet-Bonnet esthesiometer. The palpebral fissure length (PFL) was measured with a calliper ruler. The Schirmer tear test (STT) was modified by adapting the width of the STT strip to the PFL of every species. For the STT II, 0.4% oxybuprocaine was applied. RESULTS: Corneal touch threshold: Cows (1.67 g/mm(2)), horses (1.23 g/mm(2)), sheep (1.13 g/mm(2)), goats (1.44 g/mm(2)), dogs (2.16 g/mm(2)), and cats (1.33 g/mm(2)) show similar CTT values. In contrast, rabbits (6.21 g/mm(2)) and guinea pigs (7.75 g/mm(2)) show a significantly lower CTT. Tear Production Difference STT I - STT II: Rabbits have the greatest decline in tear production with 38.4%, followed by sheep (33.3%), dogs (31.1%), cats (24.7%), cows (23.7%), horses (18.0%), and goats (14.0%). Guinea pigs have no decline, but a slight increase of -16.0%. Correlation CTT and STT II - STT I Difference: Pearson's correlation coefficient shows a small, but significant correlation. The coefficient of determination can only forecast a value with 7.1% certainty. CONCLUSIONS: The high variance and low reproducibility of results suggest that the measuring devices are inappropriate to assess the evaluated parameters. Therefore, no assured correlation between the corneal sensitivity and the quantity of reflex tearing could be found.
Authors: Ann R Strom; Dennis E Cortés; Sara M Thomasy; Philip H Kass; Mark J Mannis; Christopher J Murphy Journal: Vet Ophthalmol Date: 2015-03-06 Impact factor: 1.644
Authors: Mary R Telle; Nickolas Chen; Daniel Shinsako; Julie A Kiland; Kazuya Oikawa; Ralph Møller Trane; Gillian J McLellan Journal: Vet Ophthalmol Date: 2018-03-08 Impact factor: 1.644
Authors: Tina B McKay; Yashar Seyed-Razavi; Chiara E Ghezzi; Gabriela Dieckmann; Thomas J F Nieland; Dana M Cairns; Rachel E Pollard; Pedram Hamrah; David L Kaplan Journal: Prog Retin Eye Res Date: 2018-11-16 Impact factor: 21.198
Authors: Charles Kim; Denise Barbut; Murk H Heinemann; Gavril Pasternak; Mark I Rosenblatt Journal: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci Date: 2014-05-13 Impact factor: 4.799