Literature DB >> 23066981

Pigeons make errors as a result of interval timing in a visual, but not a visual-spatial, midsession reversal task.

Neil McMillan1, William A Roberts.   

Abstract

It has been shown previously that pigeons make surprising errors on a visually based midsession reversal task (Cook & Rosen, 2010; Rayburn-Reeves, Molet, & Zentall, 2011). We trained birds with red and green sidekeys, with one color rewarded in the first 40 trials (S1) and the other color rewarded in the latter 40 trials (S2). Importantly, in Phases 1 and 3, red and green were always presented on the same side, whereas in Phase 2 sidekeys were presented on the left and right equally often. In Phases 2 and 3, probe sessions with intertrial intervals (ITIs) longer or shorter than the training intertribal interval (ITI) were interjected among baseline sessions. Results showed that pigeons presented with visual-only cues used interval duration since the beginning of the session to predict when the reversal of reward contingency would occur, but pigeons presented with color and spatial dimensions confounded for predicting reward tended to use a more optimal reward-following strategy of choice based on local reinforcement. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2012 APA, all rights reserved).

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23066981     DOI: 10.1037/a0030192

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process        ISSN: 0097-7403


  11 in total

1.  Midsession reversal learning by pigeons: Effect on accuracy of increasing the number of stimuli associated with one of the alternatives.

Authors:  Thomas R Zentall; Daniel N Peng; Dalton C House; Ryan Yadav
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2019-12       Impact factor: 1.986

Review 2.  The role of context in animal memory.

Authors:  William A Roberts
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2019-06       Impact factor: 1.986

3.  Midsession shifts in reward probability and the control of behavioral variability.

Authors:  W David Stahlman; Kenneth J Leising
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2016-09       Impact factor: 1.986

4.  Pigeons' midsession reversal: Greater magnitude of reinforcement on the first half of the session leads to improved accuracy.

Authors:  Peyton M Mueller; Thomas R Zentall
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2021-06       Impact factor: 1.986

5.  Rats' midsession reversal performance: the nature of the response.

Authors:  Aaron P Smith; Kristina F Pattison; Thomas R Zentall
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2016-03       Impact factor: 1.986

6.  Everywhere and everything: The power and ubiquity of time.

Authors:  Andrew T Marshall; Kimberly Kirkpatrick
Journal:  Int J Comp Psychol       Date:  2015

7.  Midsession reversals with pigeons: visual versus spatial discriminations and the intertrial interval.

Authors:  Jennifer R Laude; Jessica P Stagner; Rebecca Rayburn-Reeves; Thomas R Zentall
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 1.986

8.  The Organization of Behavior Over Time: Insights from Mid-Session Reversal.

Authors:  Rebecca M Rayburn-Reeves; Robert G Cook
Journal:  Comp Cogn Behav Rev       Date:  2016

9.  Assessing human performance during contingency changes and extinction tests in reversal-learning tasks.

Authors:  Carolyn M Ritchey; Shawn P Gilroy; Toshikazu Kuroda; Christopher A Podlesnik
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2022-02-02       Impact factor: 1.986

10.  Temporal dynamics of task switching and abstract-concept learning in pigeons.

Authors:  Thomas A Daniel; Robert G Cook; Jeffrey S Katz
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2015-09-02
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.