Literature DB >> 23066837

Exploring objective and subjective numeracy at a population level: findings from the 2007 Health Information National Trends Survey (HINTS).

Wendy L Nelson1, Richard P Moser, Paul K J Han.   

Abstract

Numeracy is a critical component of decision making in health, and low numeracy may adversely affect risk comprehension, medical treatment, and health outcomes. Health researchers have developed objective and subjective measures of numeracy that potentially could be used for clinical or health research purposes. To examine the association between objective and subjective numeracy at a population level, data were obtained from the 2007 Health Information National Trends Survey, a health communication survey that collects data from a nationally representative sample of the U.S. population. Associations between items from 2 published subjective numeracy measures (STAT-Confidence Scale; Subjective Numeracy Scale) and a single published objective numeracy measure were examined with respect to one another and with respect to sociodemographic characteristics using a multivariate logistic regression model. Controlling for demographic covariates, both subjective numeracy measures were significantly associated with each other (p < .0001) and with objective numeracy (p < .0001). Compared with respondents who regarded themselves as low in subjective numeracy, those who regarded themselves as high in subjective numeracy had significantly higher odds of answering the objective numeracy question correctly (STAT-Confidence Scale OR = 1.42, CI [1.07, 1.90]; Subjective Numeracy Scale OR = 1.71, CI [1.28, 2.28]). However, the subjective measures performed poorly as diagnostic indicators of objective numeracy. Sensitivity and specificity for the STAT-Confidence Scale and the Subjective Numeracy Scale were 67%/49% and 50%/71%, respectively. More work is needed to elucidate the relation between objective and subjective numeracy, at the conceptual and empirical levels, and to develop more robust measures of subjective numeracy that can better discriminate between individuals with low and high objective numeracy.

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23066837     DOI: 10.1080/10810730.2012.688450

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Health Commun        ISSN: 1081-0730


  10 in total

1.  From Dyadic Ties to Information Infrastructures: Care-Coordination between Patients, Providers, Students and Researchers. Contribution of the Health Informatics Education Working Group.

Authors:  S Purkayastha; A Price; R Biswas; A U Jai Ganesh; P Otero
Journal:  Yearb Med Inform       Date:  2015-06-30

2.  Examining the Interrelations Among Objective and Subjective Health Literacy and Numeracy and Their Associations with Health Knowledge.

Authors:  Erika A Waters; Caitlin Biddle; Kimberly A Kaphingst; Elizabeth Schofield; Marc T Kiviniemi; Heather Orom; Yuelin Li; Jennifer L Hay
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2018-08-17       Impact factor: 5.128

3.  Physical activity: the relative associations with cognitive and affective risk beliefs.

Authors:  Eva Janssen; Erika A Waters
Journal:  Psychol Health       Date:  2019-04-23

Review 4.  How can health literacy influence outcomes in heart failure patients? Mechanisms and interventions.

Authors:  Cheryl Westlake; Kristen Sethares; Patricia Davidson
Journal:  Curr Heart Fail Rep       Date:  2013-09

5.  Combining risk communication strategies to simultaneously convey the risks of four diseases associated with physical inactivity to socio-demographically diverse populations.

Authors:  Eva Janssen; Robert A C Ruiter; Erika A Waters
Journal:  J Behav Med       Date:  2017-10-13

6.  The effect of a supplementary ('Gist-based') information leaflet on colorectal cancer knowledge and screening intention: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Samuel G Smith; Rosalind Raine; Austin Obichere; Michael S Wolf; Jane Wardle; Christian von Wagner
Journal:  J Behav Med       Date:  2014-09-25

7.  Validating Health Literacy and Numeracy Measures in Minority Groups.

Authors:  Rosette J Chakkalakal; Sneha Venkatraman; Richard O White; Sunil Kripalani; Russell Rothman; Kenneth Wallston
Journal:  Health Lit Res Pract       Date:  2017-04-21

8.  Understanding Health Risk Comprehension: The Role of Math Anxiety, Subjective Numeracy, and Objective Numeracy.

Authors:  Jonathan J Rolison; Kinga Morsanyi; Ellen Peters
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  2020-02-13       Impact factor: 2.583

9.  How People Understand Risk Matrices, and How Matrix Design Can Improve their Use: Findings from Randomized Controlled Studies.

Authors:  Holly Sutherland; Gabriel Recchia; Sarah Dryhurst; Alexandra L J Freeman
Journal:  Risk Anal       Date:  2021-09-14       Impact factor: 4.302

10.  Multifactorial beliefs about the role of genetics and behavior in common health conditions: prevalence and associations with participant characteristics and engagement in health behaviors.

Authors:  Erika A Waters; Jaclyn Muff; Jada G Hamilton
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2014-05-15       Impact factor: 8.822

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.