| Literature DB >> 23066405 |
Francis Lwanga1, Barbara Eva Kirunda2, Christopher Garimoi Orach1.
Abstract
A cross-sectional study to assess the prevalence of intestinal helminth infections and nutritional status of primary school children was conducted in the Wakiso district in Central Uganda. A total of 432 primary school children aged 6-14 years were randomly selected from 23 schools. Anthropometric measurements of weight, height, MUAC were undertaken and analyzed using AnthroPlus software. Stool samples were examined using a Kato-Katz method. The prevalence of stunting, underweight and moderate acute malnutrition (MAM) was 22.5%, 5.3% and 18.5% respectively. Males had a threefold risk of being underweight (OR 3.2, 95% CI 1.17-9.4, p = 0.011) and 2 fold risk of suffering from MAM (OR 2.1, 95% CI 1.21-3.48, p = 0.004). Children aged 10-14 years had a 2.9 fold risk of stunting (OR 2.9, 95% CI 1.37-6.16, p = 0.002) and 1.9 risk of MAM (OR 1.9, 95% CI 1.07-3.44, p = 0.019). Attending urban slum schools had 1.7 fold risk of stunting (OR 1.7, 95% CI 1.03-2.75, p = 0.027). Rural schools presented a twofold risk of helminth infection (OR 1.95, 95% CI 1.12-3.32, p = 0.012). The prevalence of helminth infections was (10.9%), (3.1%), (1.9%), (0.2%) for hookworm, Trichuriatrichiura, Schistosomamansoni and Ascarislumbricoides, respectively. The study revealed that 26.6%, 46% and 10.3% of incidences of stunting, underweight and MAM respectively were attributable to helminth infections.Entities:
Keywords: Uganda; helminths; moderate acute malnutrition (MAM); stunting; underweight
Mesh:
Year: 2012 PMID: 23066405 PMCID: PMC3447595 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph9082910
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health ISSN: 1660-4601 Impact factor: 4.614
Characteristics of children and schools.
| Characteristic | n = 432 | (%) |
|---|---|---|
|
| ||
| 6–9 | 93 | 21.5 |
| 10–14 | 339 | 78.5 |
|
| ||
| Female | 224 | 51.9 |
| Male | 208 | 48.1 |
|
| ||
| Rural | 203 | 47.0 |
| Urban slums | 229 | 53.0 |
|
| ||
| Public | 217 | 50.2 |
| Private | 215 | 49.8 |
Nutritional status of children investigated.
| Variable | Nutritional Status n = 432 | Odds Ratio | 95% CI |
| |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| −2SD & below n (%) | Above −2SD n (%) | ||||
|
| |||||
|
| |||||
| 10–14 | 87 (20.0) | 252 (58.3) | 2.9 | 1.37–6.16 | 0.002 * |
| 6–9 | 10 (2.3) | 83 (19.2) | |||
|
| |||||
| Female | 43 (10.0) | 181 (41.9) | 0.68 | 0.42–1.9 | 0.092 |
| Male | 54 (12.5) | 154 (35.6) | |||
|
| |||||
| Urban slums | 61 (14.2) | 168 (38.9) | 1.7 | 1.03–2.75 | 0.027 * |
| Rural | 36 (8.3) | 167 (38.7) | |||
|
| |||||
| Public | 43 (10.0) | 174 (40.3) | 0.74 | 0.46–1.12 | 0.187 |
| Private | 54 (12.5) | 161 (37.2) | |||
|
| |||||
|
| |||||
| 6–9 | 5 (1.1) | 88 (20.4) | 1.0 | 0.32–3.00 | 1.0 |
| 10–14 | 18 (4.2) | 321 (74.3) | |||
|
| |||||
| Male | 17 (3.9) | 191 (44.2) | 3.2 | 1.17–9.4 | 0.011 * |
| Female | 6 (1.4) | 218 (50.5) | |||
|
| |||||
| Rural | 9 (2.1) | 194 (44.9) | 0.71 | 0.28–1.80 | 0.438 |
| Urban slums | 14 (3.2) | 215 (49.8) | |||
|
| |||||
| Public | 8 (1.8) | 209 (48.4) | 0.51 | 0.19–1.31 | 0.128 |
| Private | 15 (3.5) | 200 (46.3) | |||
* p value < 0.005, statistically significant association.
Nutritional status of children as measured by MUAC.
| Variable | Nutritional status | Odds ratio | 95% CI |
| |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MAM n (%) | Normal n (%) | ||||
|
| |||||
| 11–14 | 60 (13.9) | 215 (49.8) | 1.9 | 1..07–3.44 | 0.019 * |
| 6–10 | 20 (4.6) | 137 (31.7) | |||
|
| |||||
| Male | 50 (11.6) | 158 (36.6) | 2.1 | 1.21–3.48 | 0.004 * |
| Female | 30 (6.9) | 194 (44.9) | |||
|
| |||||
| Rural | 37 (8.5) | 166 (38.5) | 0.96 | 0.58–1.61 | 0.883 |
| Urban slums | 43 (10.0) | 186 (43.0) | |||
|
| |||||
| Public | 41 (9.5) | 176 (40.7) | 1.1 | 0.63–1.76 | 0.840 |
| Private | 39 (9.0) | 176 (40.7) | |||
* p value < 0.005, statistically significant association.
Helminth infection by socio-demographic characteristics and de-worming period.
| Variable | Helminth infection | Odds | 95% CI |
| |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Infected n = 69 (%) | Uninfected n = 363 (%) | ratio | |||
|
| |||||
| 6–9 | 09 (2.1) | 84(19.4) | 2.01 | 0.92–4.54 | 0.061 |
| 10–14 | 60 (13.9) | 279 (64.6) | |||
|
| |||||
| Females | 28 (6.5) | 196(45.5) | 0.96 | 0.56–1.66 | 0.89 |
| Males | 41(9.5) | 298 (69.0) | |||
|
| |||||
| Rural | 42 (9.7) | 161 (37.3) | 1.95 | 1.122–3.42 | 0.012* |
| Urban slums | 27 (6.3) | 202 (46.8) | |||
|
| |||||
| Public | 36 (8.3) | 181(41.9) | 1.1 | 0.64–1.89 | 0.72 |
| Private | 33 (7.60) | 182 (42.1) | |||
|
| |||||
| July-September 2010 | 35 (8.1) | 122 (28.2) | 2.03 | 1.17–3.53 | 0.007* |
| October-December 2010 | 34 7.9) | 241 (55.8) | |||
* p value < 0.005, statistically significant association.
Comparisons of nutritional status and helminth infections.
| Helminth infections | Nutritional status | Row total | Row % | 95% CI |
| Percentage attribution risk | Population attribution risk |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| |||||||
| Stunted | |||||||
| Normal | |||||||
| Infected | 20 49 | 69 | 29 | 0.8-2.8 | 0.2 | 26.6 | 5.8 |
| Uninfected | 77 286 | 363 | 21 | ||||
|
| |||||||
| Underweight | |||||||
| Normal | |||||||
| Infected | 6 63 | 69 | 8.7 | 0.7-5.5 | 0.2 | 46 | 79 |
| Uninfected | 17 | 363 | 5 | ||||
| 346 | |||||||
|
| |||||||
| MAM | |||||||
| Normal | |||||||
| Infected | 14 55 | 69 | 20.3 | 0.6-2.3 | 0.7 | 10.3 | 19.1 |
| Uninfected | 66 297 | 363 | 18.2 |