Literature DB >> 23065691

KRAS G>A mutation favors poor tumor differentiation but may not be associated with prognosis in patients with curatively resected duodenal adenocarcinoma.

Tao Fu1, Angela A Guzzetta, Jana Jeschke, Rajita Vatapalli, Pujan Dave, Craig M Hooker, Richard Morgan, Christine A Iacobuzio-Donahue, Baohua Liu, Nita Ahuja.   

Abstract

KRAS mutations have been found in duodenal adenocarcinomas and may have prognostic significance. The purpose of this study was to classify clinicopathological characteristics, microsatellite instability and KRAS mutations and identify possible prognostic role of KRAS mutations in duodenal adenocarcinomas. Demographics, tumor characteristics and survival were recorded for 78 patients with duodenal adenocarcinomas (Stages I-III). KRAS mutations were detected in 27 (34.6%) cases, of which the majority (74.1%) were G>A transitions. Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that KRAS G>A mutation was significantly associated with late stage (p = 0.025) and poor tumor differentiation (p = 0.035), when compared with wild-type and other than G>A mutations. KRAS G>A mutation carriers were at increased risk for distant relapse (p = 0.022) and had significantly shorter overall survival (OS; log-rank p = 0.045) and a trend toward shorter relapse-free survival (RFS; log-rank p = 0.062) when compared with those who did not carry the KRAS G>A mutation. In multivariate analyses, there was a significant correlation between ≥ 3 positive lymph nodes and poor OS (p < 0.001) and RFS (p = 0.001) and KRAS G>A mutation carriers demonstrated no effect on clinical outcome. In conclusion, KRAS G>A mutation correlates significantly with late stage and poor tumor differentiation in duodenal adenocarcinoma. Among patients who undergo a curative resection of duodenal adenocarcinoma, KRAS G>A mutation carriers will more likely experience distant relapse but may not exhibit a poor prognosis. The number of positive lymph nodes should be incorporated in future staging systems.
Copyright © 2013 UICC.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23065691      PMCID: PMC3579006          DOI: 10.1002/ijc.27910

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Cancer        ISSN: 0020-7136            Impact factor:   7.396


  40 in total

1.  Second-line chemotherapy with fluorouracil, leucovorin, and irinotecan (FOLFIRI regimen) in patients with advanced small bowel adenocarcinoma after failure of first-line platinum-based chemotherapy: a multicenter AGEO study.

Authors:  Aziz Zaanan; Mélanie Gauthier; David Malka; Christophe Locher; Jean-Marc Gornet; Anne Thirot-Bidault; David Tougeron; Julien Taïeb; Franck Bonnetain; Thomas Aparicio
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2010-11-08       Impact factor: 6.860

2.  Genetic alterations in sporadic and Crohn's-associated adenocarcinomas of the small intestine.

Authors:  A Rashid; S R Hamilton
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  1997-07       Impact factor: 22.682

3.  Cancer statistics, 2011: the impact of eliminating socioeconomic and racial disparities on premature cancer deaths.

Authors:  Rebecca Siegel; Elizabeth Ward; Otis Brawley; Ahmedin Jemal
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  2011-06-17       Impact factor: 508.702

4.  Malignant small bowel neoplasms: histopathologic determinants of recurrence and survival.

Authors:  J D Cunningham; R Aleali; M Aleali; S T Brower; A H Aufses
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1997-03       Impact factor: 12.969

5.  What prognostic factors are important in duodenal adenocarcinoma?

Authors:  F G Bakaeen; M M Murr; M G Sarr; G B Thompson; M B Farnell; D M Nagorney; D R Farley; J A van Heerden; L M Wiersema; C D Schleck; J H Donohue
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  2000-06

6.  Inactivation of the DNA repair gene O6-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase by promoter hypermethylation is associated with G to A mutations in K-ras in colorectal tumorigenesis.

Authors:  M Esteller; M Toyota; M Sanchez-Cespedes; G Capella; M A Peinado; D N Watkins; J P Issa; D Sidransky; S B Baylin; J G Herman
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2000-05-01       Impact factor: 12.701

7.  Diagnostic microsatellite instability: definition and correlation with mismatch repair protein expression.

Authors:  W Dietmaier; S Wallinger; T Bocker; F Kullmann; R Fishel; J Rüschoff
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  1997-11-01       Impact factor: 12.701

8.  The presence of K-12 ras mutations in duodenal adenocarcinomas and the absence of ras mutations in other small bowel adenocarcinomas and carcinoid tumors.

Authors:  N Younes; N Fulton; R Tanaka; J Wayne; F H Straus; E L Kaplan
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1997-05-01       Impact factor: 6.860

9.  Prognostic value of lymph node evaluation in small bowel adenocarcinoma: analysis of the surveillance, epidemiology, and end results database.

Authors:  Michael J Overman; Chung-Yuan Hu; Robert A Wolff; George J Chang
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2010-08-16       Impact factor: 6.860

10.  Molecular pathogenesis of sporadic duodenal cancer.

Authors:  A Achille; A Baron; G Zamboni; S Orlandini; G Bogina; C Bassi; C Iacono; A Scarpa
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1998-03       Impact factor: 7.640

View more
  10 in total

1.  Clinicopathologic and prognostic associations of KRAS and BRAF mutations in small intestinal adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Sun-Young Jun; Misung Kim; Mi Jin Gu; Young Kyung Bae; Hee-Kyung Chang; Eun Sun Jung; Kee-Taek Jang; Jihun Kim; Eunsil Yu; Dae Woon Eom; Seung-Mo Hong
Journal:  Mod Pathol       Date:  2016-02-19       Impact factor: 7.842

2.  Clinical and endoscopic findings to assist the early detection of duodenal adenoma and adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Juntaro Matsuzaki; Hidekazu Suzuki; Masayuki Shimoda; Hideki Mori; Seiichiro Fukuhara; Sawako Miyoshi; Tatsuhiro Masaoka; Yasushi Iwao; Yae Kanai; Takanori Kanai
Journal:  United European Gastroenterol J       Date:  2018-12-03       Impact factor: 4.623

3.  Molecular Aberrations in Periampullary Carcinoma.

Authors:  Mallika Tewari; Jyoti R Swain; V K Dixit; H S Shukla
Journal:  Indian J Surg Oncol       Date:  2017-03-21

4.  Methylation of MGMT Is Associated with Poor Prognosis in Patients with Stage III Duodenal Adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Tao Fu; Anup Sharmab; Fei Xie; Yanliang Liu; Kai Li; Weiwei Wan; Stephen B Baylin; Christopher L Wolfgang; Nita Ahuja
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-09-19       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 5.  Ampullary cancer of intestinal origin and duodenal cancer - A logical clinical and therapeutic subgroup in periampullary cancer.

Authors:  Manju D Chandrasegaram; Anthony J Gill; Jas Samra; Tim Price; John Chen; Jonathan Fawcett; Neil D Merrett
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Oncol       Date:  2017-10-15

6.  Personalized treatment based on mini patient-derived xenografts and WES/RNA sequencing in a patient with metastatic duodenal adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Peng Zhao; Hui Chen; Danyi Wen; Shuo Mou; Feifei Zhang; Shusen Zheng
Journal:  Cancer Commun (Lond)       Date:  2018-08-23

7.  Molecular alterations and PD-L1 expression in non-ampullary duodenal adenocarcinoma: Associations among clinicopathological, immunophenotypic and molecular features.

Authors:  Jiro Watari; Seiichiro Mitani; Chiyomi Ito; Katsuyuki Tozawa; Toshihiko Tomita; Tadayuki Oshima; Hirokazu Fukui; Shigenori Kadowaki; Seiji Natsume; Yoshiki Senda; Masahiro Tajika; Kazuo Hara; Yasushi Yatabe; Yasuhiro Shimizu; Kei Muro; Takeshi Morimoto; Seiichi Hirota; Kiron M Das; Hiroto Miwa
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-07-19       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  Small bowel adenocarcinoma phenotyping, a clinicobiological prognostic study.

Authors:  T Aparicio; M Svrcek; A Zaanan; E Beohou; A Laforest; P Afchain; Emmanuel Mitry; J Taieb; F Di Fiore; J-M Gornet; A Thirot-Bidault; I Sobhani; D Malka; T Lecomte; C Locher; F Bonnetain; P Laurent-Puig
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2013-11-05       Impact factor: 7.640

Review 9.  Genetic Alterations of Periampullary and Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma: An Overview.

Authors:  Nilabja Sikdar; Gourab Saha; Ashmita Dutta; Shibajyoti Ghosh; Shailesh V Shrikhande; Sudeep Banerjee
Journal:  Curr Genomics       Date:  2018-09       Impact factor: 2.236

10.  KRAS and BRAF mutations induce anoikis resistance and characteristic 3D phenotypes in Caco‑2 cells.

Authors:  Madhura Patankar; Sinikka Eskelinen; Anne Tuomisto; Markus J Mäkinen; Tuomo J Karttunen
Journal:  Mol Med Rep       Date:  2019-09-20       Impact factor: 2.952

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.