Literature DB >> 20715162

Prognostic value of lymph node evaluation in small bowel adenocarcinoma: analysis of the surveillance, epidemiology, and end results database.

Michael J Overman1, Chung-Yuan Hu, Robert A Wolff, George J Chang.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The presence of distant metastases and the completeness of resection are important prognostic factors in patients with small bowel adenocarcinoma (SBA); however, the influence of lymph node metastasis on patient outcome has not been well characterized. The objective of the current study was to evaluate the impact of the number of positive and negative lymph nodes on survival after curative resection.
METHODS: Patients who had SBA diagnosed between 1988 and 2005 were identified from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) registry. Cox proportional hazards regression analyses were performed after adjusting for age, sex, race, tumor stage, tumor grade, and primary site. Five-year disease-specific survival (DSS) was determined, all patients were categorized according to the total lymph nodes (TLNs) assessed, and patients with stage III disease also were categorized according to the number of positive lymph nodes (PLNs) and the PLN-to-TLN ratio (the lymph node ratio [LNR]).
RESULTS: In total, 1991 patients (n=1216 with stage I/II SBA and n=775 with stage III SBA) were analyzed. Survival depended on the TLNs assessed. The 5-year DSS rate for patients with stage II disease was associated with the TLNs assessed (44%, 69%, and 83% for 0 TLNs, 1-7 TLNs, and>7 TLNs, respectively). The 5-year DSS for patients with stage III disease was associated with the number of PLNs (58% and 37% for <3 PLNs and ≥3 PLNs, respectively). Among patients with stage III disease, the LNR was even more predictive of survival than stratification by the number of PLNs.
CONCLUSIONS: Survival after surgical resection for stage I, II, and III SBA was associated with the TLNs assessed. Stratifying patients with stage III disease into those with <3 PLNs and ≥3 PLNs significantly improved prognostication.
Copyright © 2010 American Cancer Society.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20715162     DOI: 10.1002/cncr.25324

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer        ISSN: 0008-543X            Impact factor:   6.860


  41 in total

Review 1.  Management of Advanced Small Bowel Cancer.

Authors:  Alberto Puccini; Francesca Battaglin; Heinz-Josef Lenz
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Oncol       Date:  2018-11-05

2.  Patients with Adenocarcinoma of the Small Intestine with 9 or More Regional Lymph Nodes Retrieved Have a Higher Rate of Positive Lymph Nodes and Improved Survival.

Authors:  Alexander Wilhelm; Sascha A Müller; Thomas Steffen; Bruno M Schmied; Ulrich Beutner; Rene Warschkow
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 3.452

3.  A population-based comparison of adenocarcinoma of the large and small intestine: insights into a rare disease.

Authors:  Michael J Overman; Chung-Yuan Hu; Scott Kopetz; James L Abbruzzese; Robert A Wolff; George J Chang
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2011-12-21       Impact factor: 5.344

4.  S-1 treatment leading to complete remission of advanced duodenal adenocarcinoma: A case report.

Authors:  Lijun Wang; Quanmao Song; Jinpeng Li; Xiaohua Chen
Journal:  Mol Clin Oncol       Date:  2015-07-21

5.  KRAS G>A mutation favors poor tumor differentiation but may not be associated with prognosis in patients with curatively resected duodenal adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Tao Fu; Angela A Guzzetta; Jana Jeschke; Rajita Vatapalli; Pujan Dave; Craig M Hooker; Richard Morgan; Christine A Iacobuzio-Donahue; Baohua Liu; Nita Ahuja
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2013-01-18       Impact factor: 7.396

6.  Effect of postoperative radiotherapy on survival in duodenal adenocarcinoma: a propensity score-adjusted analysis of Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database.

Authors:  Yu Jin Lim; Kyubo Kim
Journal:  Int J Clin Oncol       Date:  2017-12-19       Impact factor: 3.402

7.  Widespread lymph node recurrence of major duodenal papilla cancer following pancreaticoduodenectomy.

Authors:  Bai-Sen Li; Hui Shi; Min Wen; Ming-Yong Xiao; Jian Wang
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2015-12-28       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 8.  Small bowel adenocarcinomas--existing evidence and evolving paradigms.

Authors:  Kanwal Raghav; Michael J Overman
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2013-07-30       Impact factor: 66.675

Review 9.  Duodenal adenocarcinoma: Advances in diagnosis and surgical management.

Authors:  Jordan M Cloyd; Elizabeth George; Brendan C Visser
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2016-03-27

10.  GNAS-mutated carcinoma arising from gastric foveolar metaplasia in the duodenum after 9 years of observation.

Authors:  Yasumasa Matsuo; Hiroyuki Yamamoto; Yoshinori Sato; Ritsuko Oikawa; Tadateru Maehata; Takashi Fujino; Naohisa Yahagi; Hiroshi Yasuda; Masayuki Takagi; Fumio Itoh
Journal:  Clin J Gastroenterol       Date:  2018-03-31
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.