Literature DB >> 23065657

RAD51 overexpression is a negative prognostic marker for colorectal adenocarcinoma.

Pierre Tennstedt1, Robert Fresow, Ronald Simon, Andreas Marx, Luigi Terracciano, Cordula Petersen, Guido Sauter, Ekkehard Dikomey, Kerstin Borgmann.   

Abstract

RAD51 is the central protein in the homologous recombination pathway and is therefore of great relevance in terms of both therapy resistance as well as genomic stability. By using a tissue microarray analysis of 1,213 biopsies taken from colorectal adenocarcinomas (CRCs), we investigated whether RAD51 expression can be used as a prognostic marker as well as potential associations between this and the expression of other proteins known to be related to CRC. Strong RAD51 expression was observed in 1% of CRC, moderate in 11%, weak in 34% and no expression in 44%. No correlation was found between RAD51 expression and clinicopathological parameters. RAD51 expression correlated significantly (p = 0.001) with overall survival, with a median survival of 11 months for patients with strong, 46 with moderate, 76 with weak and 68 with negative expression. Multivariate analyses revealed that in addition to tumor stage (p < 0.0001) and nodal status (p < 0.0001), RAD51 expression is also an independent prognostic parameter (p = 0.011). Strong RAD51 expression was found to be associated with the loss of the two DNA mismatch repair proteins MSH (p = 0.0003), MLH (p = 0.002) and β-catenin (p = 0.012) as well as with elevated p21 (p = 0.003) and EGFR expression (p = 0.0001). However, a correlation with overall survival could only be found for EGFR expression (p = 0.008), although no added benefit in risk stratification could be determined when evaluated together with RAD51. Overexpression of RAD51 is a predictor of poor outcome in CRC. This finding indicated the promise of future studies using RAD51 as a prognostic marker and therapeutic target.
Copyright © 2012 UICC.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23065657     DOI: 10.1002/ijc.27907

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Cancer        ISSN: 0020-7136            Impact factor:   7.396


  47 in total

1.  High levels of RAD51 perturb DNA replication elongation and cause unscheduled origin firing due to impaired CHK1 activation.

Authors:  Ann Christin Parplys; Jasna Irena Seelbach; Saskia Becker; Matthias Behr; Agnieszka Wrona; Camilla Jend; Wael Yassin Mansour; Simon Andreas Joosse; Horst-Werner Stuerzbecher; Helmut Pospiech; Cordula Petersen; Ekkehard Dikomey; Kerstin Borgmann
Journal:  Cell Cycle       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 4.534

2.  RADX Promotes Genome Stability and Modulates Chemosensitivity by Regulating RAD51 at Replication Forks.

Authors:  Huzefa Dungrawala; Kamakoti P Bhat; Rémy Le Meur; Walter J Chazin; Xia Ding; Shyam K Sharan; Sarah R Wessel; Aditya A Sathe; Runxiang Zhao; David Cortez
Journal:  Mol Cell       Date:  2017-07-20       Impact factor: 17.970

3.  Rosiglitazone enhances radiosensitivity by inhibiting repair of DNA damage in cervical cancer cells.

Authors:  Zhengzhe An; Jae-Ran Yu; Woo-Yoon Park
Journal:  Radiat Environ Biophys       Date:  2017-02-09       Impact factor: 1.925

4.  RAD51 regulates CHK1 stability via autophagy to promote cell growth in esophageal squamous carcinoma cells.

Authors:  Xinyi Zhu; Qiuhui Pan; Nan Huang; Jianchun Wu; Ni Zhen; Fenyong Sun; Zhi Li; Qingyuan Yang
Journal:  Tumour Biol       Date:  2016-10-14

5.  Dosage-dependent copy number gains in E2f1 and E2f3 drive hepatocellular carcinoma.

Authors:  Lindsey N Kent; Sooin Bae; Shih-Yin Tsai; Xing Tang; Arunima Srivastava; Christopher Koivisto; Chelsea K Martin; Elisa Ridolfi; Grace C Miller; Sarah M Zorko; Emilia Plevris; Yannis Hadjiyannis; Miguel Perez; Eric Nolan; Raleigh Kladney; Bart Westendorp; Alain de Bruin; Soledad Fernandez; Thomas J Rosol; Kamal S Pohar; James M Pipas; Gustavo Leone
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  2017-01-30       Impact factor: 14.808

6.  β1-Integrin Impacts Rad51 Stability and DNA Double-Strand Break Repair by Homologous Recombination.

Authors:  Kazi Mokim Ahmed; Raj K Pandita; Dharmendra Kumar Singh; Clayton R Hunt; Tej K Pandita
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2018-04-16       Impact factor: 4.272

Review 7.  RPA and RAD51: fork reversal, fork protection, and genome stability.

Authors:  Kamakoti P Bhat; David Cortez
Journal:  Nat Struct Mol Biol       Date:  2018-05-28       Impact factor: 15.369

Review 8.  DNA repair targeted therapy: The past or future of cancer treatment?

Authors:  Navnath S Gavande; Pamela S VanderVere-Carozza; Hilary D Hinshaw; Shadia I Jalal; Catherine R Sears; Katherine S Pawelczak; John J Turchi
Journal:  Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2016-02-16       Impact factor: 12.310

9.  Proteomic Features of Colorectal Cancer Identify Tumor Subtypes Independent of Oncogenic Mutations and Independently Predict Relapse-Free Survival.

Authors:  Callisia N Clarke; Michael S Lee; Wei Wei; Ganiraju Manyam; Zhi-Qin Jiang; Yiling Lu; Jeffrey Morris; Bradley Broom; David Menter; Eduardo Vilar-Sanchez; Kanwal Raghav; Cathy Eng; George J Chang; Iris Simon; Rene Bernards; Michael Overman; Gordon B Mills; Dipen Maru; Scott Kopetz
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2017-09-21       Impact factor: 5.344

10.  Polymorphism within the distal RAD51 gene promoter is associated with colorectal cancer in a Polish population.

Authors:  Bartosz Mucha; Jacek Kabzinski; Adam Dziki; Karolina Przybylowska-Sygut; Andrzej Sygut; Ireneusz Majsterek; Lukasz Dziki
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Pathol       Date:  2015-09-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.