Literature DB >> 23065540

Positive organizational outcomes associated with a penchant for openness.

G Steven McMillan1, Debra L Casey.   

Abstract

The tension between scientific openness versus secrecy has existed for centuries (Hull 1985). However, both academics and practitioners have recently argued that openness by private firms has many positive attributes. The purpose of this research effort is to review the extant literature on openness and to develop hypotheses regarding its impact on organizational outcomes. We then use a unique database to test the idea with 87 companies. Our findings are that openness is beneficial to the firm from a science, technological, and financial perspective and, perhaps, to the employees from an ethical viewpoint. The managerial and societal implications are also discussed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23065540     DOI: 10.1007/s11948-012-9404-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics        ISSN: 1353-3452            Impact factor:   3.525


  7 in total

1.  The morality of scientific openness.

Authors:  Christian Munthe; Stellan Welin
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  1996-10       Impact factor: 3.525

2.  Secrecy in science: exploring university, industry, and government relationships.

Authors:  Amy C Crumpton
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  1999-07       Impact factor: 3.525

3.  Pedestrian crash estimation models for signalized intersections.

Authors:  Srinivas S Pulugurtha; Venkata R Sambhara
Journal:  Accid Anal Prev       Date:  2010-10-30

4.  The essential nature of sharing in science.

Authors:  Beth A Fischer; Michael J Zigmond
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2010-11-25       Impact factor: 3.525

5.  Openness versus Secrecy in Scientific Research Abstract.

Authors:  David B Resnik
Journal:  Episteme (Edinb)       Date:  2006-02-01

6.  Between confidentiality and scientific exchange: the place of publication in drug discovery and pharmaceutical research.

Authors:  Martine Clozel
Journal:  Sci Transl Med       Date:  2011-01-26       Impact factor: 17.956

7.  The science commons in health research: structure, function, and value.

Authors:  Robert Cook-Deegan
Journal:  J Technol Transf       Date:  2006-12-07
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.