Literature DB >> 21113394

Openness versus Secrecy in Scientific Research Abstract.

David B Resnik1.   

Abstract

Openness is one of the most important principles in scientific inquiry, but there are many good reasons for maintaining secrecy in research, ranging from the desire to protect priority, credit, and intellectual property, to the need to safeguard the privacy of research participants or minimize threats to national or international security. This article examines the clash between openness and secrecy in science in light of some recent developments in information technology, business, and politics, and makes some practical suggestions for resolving conflicts between openness and secrecy."By academic freedom I understand the right to search for the truth and to publish and teach what one holds to be true. This right also implies a duty; one must not conceal any part of what one has recognized to be true. It is evident that any restriction of academic freedom serves to restrain the dissemination of knowledge, thereby impeding rational judgment and action."Albert Einstein, quotation inscribed on his statute in front of the National Academy of Sciences, Washington, DC.

Entities:  

Year:  2006        PMID: 21113394      PMCID: PMC2991133          DOI: 10.3366/epi.2005.2.3.135

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Episteme (Edinb)        ISSN: 1742-3600


  11 in total

1.  Battle heats up over mammography benefits.

Authors:  Eliot Marshall
Journal:  Science       Date:  2002-03-01       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  Making reviewers visible: openness, accountability, and credit.

Authors:  Fiona Godlee
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2002-06-05       Impact factor: 56.272

3.  Social epistemology and the ethics of research.

Authors:  David Resnik
Journal:  Stud Hist Philos Sci       Date:  1996-12       Impact factor: 1.429

4.  The morality of scientific openness.

Authors:  Christian Munthe; Stellan Welin
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  1996-10       Impact factor: 3.525

5.  Patient records. Privacy rule creates bottleneck for U.S. biomedical researchers.

Authors:  Jocelyn Kaiser
Journal:  Science       Date:  2004-07-09       Impact factor: 47.728

6.  Clinical trial registration: a statement from the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors.

Authors:  Catherine De Angelis; Jeffrey M Drazen; Frank A Frizelle; Charlotte Haug; John Hoey; Richard Horton; Sheldon Kotzin; Christine Laine; Ana Marusic; A John P M Overbeke; Torben V Schroeder; Hal C Sox; Martin B Van Der Weyden
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2004-09-08       Impact factor: 91.245

7.  Trial Registration at ClinicalTrials.gov between May and October 2005.

Authors:  Deborah A Zarin; Tony Tse; Nicholas C Ide
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2005-12-29       Impact factor: 91.245

8.  Science policy. A budget with big winners and losers.

Authors:  Eli Kintisch; Jeffrey Mervis
Journal:  Science       Date:  2006-02-10       Impact factor: 47.728

9.  Drug trials: stacking the deck.

Authors:  Jim Giles
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2006-03-16       Impact factor: 49.962

10.  Variola virus immune evasion design: expression of a highly efficient inhibitor of human complement.

Authors:  Ariella M Rosengard; Yu Liu; Zhiping Nie; Robert Jimenez
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2002-05-28       Impact factor: 11.205

View more
  7 in total

1.  Neuroethics, national security and secrecy.

Authors:  David B Resnik
Journal:  Am J Bioeth       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 11.229

2.  Scientific Autonomy and Public Oversight.

Authors:  David B Resnik
Journal:  Philos Sci       Date:  2008-06-01       Impact factor: 1.317

3.  Genomic research data: open vs. restricted access.

Authors:  David B Resnik
Journal:  IRB       Date:  2010 Jan-Feb

4.  Positive organizational outcomes associated with a penchant for openness.

Authors:  G Steven McMillan; Debra L Casey
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2012-10-13       Impact factor: 3.525

5.  The concept of governance in dual-use research.

Authors:  Alex Dubov
Journal:  Med Health Care Philos       Date:  2014-08

6.  Measuring national capability over big science's multidisciplinarity: A case study of nuclear fusion research.

Authors:  Hyunuk Kim; Inho Hong; Woo-Sung Jung
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-02-08       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Prepublication disclosure of scientific results: Norms, competition, and commercial orientation.

Authors:  Jerry G Thursby; Carolin Haeussler; Marie C Thursby; Lin Jiang
Journal:  Sci Adv       Date:  2018-05-16       Impact factor: 14.136

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.