Literature DB >> 23065095

Relationship between routine multi-detector cardiac computed tomographic angiography prior to reoperative cardiac surgery, length of stay, and hospital charges.

Matthew A Goldstein1, Sion K Roy, Shinivas Hebsur, Gabriel Maluenda, Gaby Weissman, Guy Weigold, Marc J Landsman, Peter C Hill, Francisco Pita, Paul J Corso, Steven W Boyce, Augusto D Pichard, Ron Waksman, Allen J Taylor.   

Abstract

While multi-detector cardiac computed tomography angiography (MDCCTA) prior to reoperative cardiac surgery (RCS) has been associated with improved clinical outcomes, its impact on hospital charges and length of stay remains unclear. We studied 364 patients undergoing RCS at Washington Hospital Center between 2004 and 2008, including 137 clinically referred for MDCCTA. Baseline demographics, procedural data, and perioperative outcomes were recorded at the time of the procedure. The primary clinical endpoint was the composite of perioperative death, myocardial infarction (MI), stroke, and hemorrhage-related reoperation. Secondary clinical endpoints included surgical procedural variables and the perioperative volume of bleeding and transfusion. Length of stay was determined using the hospital's electronic medical record. Cost data were extracted from the hospital's billing summary. Analysis was performed on individual categories of care, as well as on total hospital charges. Data were compared between subjects with and without MDCCTA, after adjustment for the Society of Thoracic Surgeons score. Baseline characteristics were similar between the two groups. MDCCTA was associated with shorter procedural times, shorter intensive care unit stays, fewer blood transfusions, and less frequent perioperative MI. There was additionally a trend towards a lower incidence of the primary endpoint (17.5 vs. 24.2 %, p = 0.13) primarily due to a lower incidence of perioperative MI (0 vs. 5.7 %, p = 0.002). MDCCTA was also associated with lower median recovery room [$1,325 (1,250-3,302) vs. $3,217 (1,325-5,353) p < 0.001] and nursing charges [$6,335 (3,623-10,478) vs. $6,916 (3,915-14,499) p = 0.03], although operating room charges were higher [$24,100 (22,300-29,700) vs. $23,500 (19,900-27,700) p < 0.05]. Median total charges [$127,000 (95,000-188,000) vs. $123,000 (86,800-226,000) p = 0.77] and length of stay [9 days (6-19) vs. 11 days (7-19), p = 0.21] were similar. Means analysis demonstrated a strong trend towards lower mean total hospital charges [$163,000 (108,426) vs. $192,000 (181,706), p = 0.06] in the MDCCTA group. In conclusion, preoperative MDCCTA is associated with a number of improved perioperative outcomes and does not significantly effect the length of stay or total hospital charges during the index hospitalization.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23065095     DOI: 10.1007/s10554-012-0133-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging        ISSN: 1569-5794            Impact factor:   2.357


  14 in total

1.  ACCF/SCCT/ACR/AHA/ASE/ASNC/NASCI/SCAI/SCMR 2010 appropriate use criteria for cardiac computed tomography. A report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation Appropriate Use Criteria Task Force, the Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography, the American College of Radiology, the American Heart Association, the American Society of Echocardiography, the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology, the North American Society for Cardiovascular Imaging, the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, and the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance.

Authors:  Allen J Taylor; Manuel Cerqueira; John McB Hodgson; Daniel Mark; James Min; Patrick O'Gara; Geoffrey D Rubin; Christopher M Kramer; Daniel Berman; Alan Brown; Farooq A Chaudhry; Ricardo C Cury; Milind Y Desai; Andrew J Einstein; Antoinette S Gomes; Robert Harrington; Udo Hoffmann; Rahul Khare; John Lesser; Christopher McGann; Alan Rosenberg; Robert Schwartz; Marc Shelton; Gerald W Smetana; Sidney C Smith
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2010-11-23       Impact factor: 24.094

Review 2.  ACCF/ACR/SCCT/SCMR/ASNC/NASCI/SCAI/SIR 2006 appropriateness criteria for cardiac computed tomography and cardiac magnetic resonance imaging: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation Quality Strategic Directions Committee Appropriateness Criteria Working Group, American College of Radiology, Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography, Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance, American Society of Nuclear Cardiology, North American Society for Cardiac Imaging, Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, and Society of Interventional Radiology.

Authors:  Robert C Hendel; Manesh R Patel; Christopher M Kramer; Michael Poon; Robert C Hendel; James C Carr; Nancy A Gerstad; Linda D Gillam; John McB Hodgson; Raymond J Kim; Christopher M Kramer; John R Lesser; Edward T Martin; Joseph V Messer; Rita F Redberg; Geoffrey D Rubin; John S Rumsfeld; Allen J Taylor; Wm Guy Weigold; Pamela K Woodard; Ralph G Brindis; Robert C Hendel; Pamela S Douglas; Eric D Peterson; Michael J Wolk; Joseph M Allen; Manesh R Patel
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2006-10-03       Impact factor: 24.094

3.  Three dimensional computed tomographic imaging in planning the surgical approach for redo cardiac surgery after coronary revascularization.

Authors:  Hrvoje Gasparovic; Frank J Rybicki; John Millstine; Daniel Unic; John G Byrne; Kent Yucel; Tomislav Mihaljevic
Journal:  Eur J Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 4.191

4.  Changing profile of patients undergoing redo-coronary artery surgery.

Authors:  Frans M van Eck; Luc Noyez; Freek W A Verheugt; Rene M H J Brouwer
Journal:  Eur J Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 4.191

Review 5.  Multidetector computed tomography in the preoperative assessment of cardiac surgery patients.

Authors:  Nila J Akhtar; Alan H Markowitz; Robert C Gilkeson
Journal:  Radiol Clin North Am       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 2.303

6.  Reoperative coronary surgery. Comparative analysis of 6591 patients undergoing primary bypass and 508 patients undergoing reoperative coronary artery bypass.

Authors:  N W Salomon; U S Page; J C Bigelow; A H Krause; J E Okies; M T Metzdorff
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  1990-08       Impact factor: 5.209

7.  The changing pattern of reoperative coronary surgery: trends in 1230 consecutive reoperations.

Authors:  T M Yau; M A Borger; R D Weisel; J Ivanov
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 5.209

8.  Long-term follow-up after coronary artery bypass grafting reoperation.

Authors:  I Shapira; A Isakov; I Heller; M Topilsky; A Pines
Journal:  Chest       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 9.410

9.  Catastrophic hemorrhage during redo sternotomy.

Authors:  A R Dobell; A K Jain
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  1984-04       Impact factor: 4.330

10.  In-hospital and long-term outcome after reoperative coronary artery bypass graft surgery.

Authors:  W S Weintraub; E L Jones; J M Craver; R Grosswald; R A Guyton
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1995-11-01       Impact factor: 29.690

View more
  7 in total

1.  Computed tomographic angiography prior to reoperative coronary artery bypass grafting: clinical benefit at the same cost.

Authors:  Ronen Rubinshtein; David A Halon; Basil S Lewis
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2012-11-21       Impact factor: 2.357

2.  Cardiac CT for planning redo cardiac surgery: effect of knowledge-based iterative model reconstruction on image quality.

Authors:  Seitaro Oda; Gaby Weissman; Mani Vembar; Wm Guy Weigold
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2014-09-03       Impact factor: 5.315

3.  Assessment of the Clinical Usefulness of Preoperative Computed Tomography in Colorectal Cancer Patients Who Received Unplanned Reoperation.

Authors:  Rui Wang; Yi Gao; Jia-Yi Li; Zhong-Hui Wang; Qin-Qing Li; Jun Feng; Chengde Liao
Journal:  Gastroenterol Res Pract       Date:  2020-06-27       Impact factor: 2.260

4.  Diagnostic accuracy of chest X-ray dose-equivalent CT for assessing calcified atherosclerotic burden of the thoracic aorta.

Authors:  Michael Messerli; Andreas A Giannopoulos; Sebastian Leschka; René Warschkow; Simon Wildermuth; Lukas Hechelhammer; Ralf W Bauer
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2017-10-03       Impact factor: 3.039

Review 5.  SCCT 2021 Expert Consensus Document on Coronary Computed Tomographic Angiography: A Report of the Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography.

Authors:  Jagat Narula; Y Chandrashekhar; Amir Ahmadi; Suhny Abbara; Daniel S Berman; Ron Blankstein; Jonathon Leipsic; David Newby; Edward D Nicol; Koen Nieman; Leslee Shaw; Todd C Villines; Michelle Williams; Harvey S Hecht
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr       Date:  2020-11-20

6.  Three-step preoperative sequential planning for pulmonary valve replacement in repaired tetralogy of Fallot using computed tomography.

Authors:  Paulo Ernando Ferraz Cavalcanti; Michel Pompeu Barros Oliveira Sá; Ricardo Felipe de Albuquerque Lins; Catarina Vasconcelos Cavalcanti; Ricardo de Carvalho Lima; Tomislav Cvitkovic; Dmitry Bobylev; Dietmar Boethig; Philipp Beerbaum; Samir Sarikouch; Axel Haverich; Alexander Horke
Journal:  Eur J Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2020-11-22       Impact factor: 4.191

7.  Routine preoperative CT: Ready to roll or a step too far?

Authors:  Pradeep Narayan; Gianni D Angelini
Journal:  J Card Surg       Date:  2022-03-10       Impact factor: 1.778

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.