| Literature DB >> 23063871 |
Lesa L Aylward1, James J Collins, Kenneth M Bodner, Michael Wilken, Catherine M Bodnar.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Exposure reconstructions and risk assessments for 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin (TCDD) and other dioxins rely on estimates of elimination rates. Limited data are available on elimination rates for congeners other than TCDD.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2012 PMID: 23063871 PMCID: PMC3552814 DOI: 10.1289/ehp.1205544
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Environ Health Perspect ISSN: 0091-6765 Impact factor: 9.031
Demographic information and chlorophenol work assignments for 56 Midland study participants (all male) with repeated blood sampling for dioxins.
| Parameter | 2004–2005 | 2010 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age at sampling [mean ± SD (range)] | 63.3 ± 7.1 (47.9–75.0) | 68.5 ± 7.0 (54.3–80.0) | |
| Smoking [n (%)] | 8 (14.3) | 7 (12.5) | |
| BMI (mean ± SD) | 32.0 ± 4.3 | 32.1 ± 4.6 | |
| Percent change in BMI [mean ± SD (range)] | 0.7 ± 7.2 (–21.0 to 19.7) | ||
| Percent change in estimated body fat volume [mean ± SD (range)] | 3.9 ± 14.6 (–38.4 to 42.0) | ||
| Total ever diagnosed with chloracne [n (%)] | 15 (26.8) | ||
| Total worked in TCP process only [n (%)] | 30 (53.6) | ||
| Total worked in PCP process only [n (%)] | 17 (30.4) | ||
| Total worked in both TCP and PCP processes [n (%)] | 9 (16.1) | ||
Concentrations of analyzed dioxin congeners (pg/g lipid) in 56 Midland study participants with repeated blood samples.
| Congener | 2004–2005 | 2010 | Mean percent change | NHANES (2003–2004) [P50, P95]b | > NHANES (2003–2004) P95 [n (%)]c | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Percent NDa | Mean ± SD | Percent NDa | Mean ± SD | |||||||||||
| TCDD | 0.0 | 21.1 ± 30.0 | 0.0 | 12.9 ± 19.6 | –39 | < LOD, 7.9 | 38 (67.9) | |||||||
| PeCDD | 0.0 | 19.7 ± 11.3 | 0.0 | 14.2 ± 8.6 | –28 | 8.0, 17.7 | 26 (46.4) | |||||||
| 14HxCDD | 0.0 | 16.0 ± 11.9 | 1.8 | 10.5 ± 7.9 | –34 | < LOD, 15.1 | 21 (37.5) | |||||||
| 16HxCDD | 0.0 | 136.6 ± 99.9 | 0.0 | 94.3 ± 70.8 | –31 | 47.3, 104 | 29 (51.8) | |||||||
| 19HxCDD | 0.0 | 19.4 ± 14.5 | 3.6 | 11.3 ± 9.8 | –42 | < LOD, 16.2 | 19 (33.9) | |||||||
| HpCDD | 0.0 | 159.9 ± 161.8 | 0.0 | 87.1 ± 83.3 | –46 | 45.6, 132 | 21 (37.5) | |||||||
| OCDD | 0.0 | 1919.6 ± 2121.0 | 0.0 | 1124.7 ± 1232.0 | –41 | 370, 1,180 | 29 (51.8) | |||||||
| TEQd | 71.4 ± 36.8 | 48.6 ± 26.3 | –32 | < LOD, 63.2 | 27 (48.2) | |||||||||
| Abbreviations: LOD, limit of detection; ND, not detected. The NHANES 50th and 95th percentiles (P50 and P95, respectively) from the 2003–2004 cycle for ages ≥ 60 years are provided for comparison, along with the number and percent of Midland study participants with 2004–2005 concentrations > NHANES P95. aPercent of participants with no detected concentration of the congener at the specified sampling time point. bNHANES 2003–2004 P50 and P95 for persons ≥ 60 years of age (Patterson et al. 2009); LODs were variable in this survey. cIndividuals sampled in 2004–2005 having concentrations greater than the NHANES (2003–2004) P95 for ages ≥ 60 years. dWHO TEQ including 7 PCDD, 10 PCDF, and 4 PCB compounds (PCBs 77, 81, 126, and 169) (van den Berg et al. 2006). | ||||||||||||||
Plausible estimated intake of dioxin congeners during the period between sampling.
| Congener | TEF | Percent of serum TEQb | Estimated intakesa | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| pg TEQ/day | pg/day | ng/year | |||
| TCDD | 1 | 12.4 | 4.1 | 4.1 | 1.5 |
| PeCDD | 1 | 18.1 | 6.1 | 6.1 | 2.2 |
| 14HxCDD | 0.1 | 2.3 | 0.8 | 7.7 | 2.8 |
| 16HxCDD | 0.1 | 20.1 | 6.7 | 67.3 | 24.6 |
| 19HxCDD | 0.1 | 2.7 | 0.9 | 8.9 | 3.3 |
| HpCDD | 0.01 | 2.3 | 0.8 | 77.7 | 28.4 |
| OCDD | 0.0003 | 0.6 | 0.2 | 673.1 | 245.7 |
| aBased on apportionment of estimated 33.5 pg TEQ/day average total TEQ intake from Lorber et al. (2010). We used the proportion of human serum lipid TEQ in NHANES 2001–2002 accounted for by each dioxin congener (Scott et al. 2008) to apportion total TEQ intake among the dioxin congeners. bPercent of serum lipid TEQ concentration attributable to the specified congener from the NHANES 2001–2002 data set (Scott et al. 2008). | |||||
Estimated half-lives of elimination (years) for selected dioxin congeners from serial serum samples of 56 Midland study participants.
| Congener | Elimination half-lives [median (P25–P75)] | Flesch-Janys et al. 1996 (median)a | Rohde et al. 1999 (mean)b | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apparent, concentration based | Apparent, mass based | Estimated intrinsic | ||||||||
| TCDD | 6.5 (5.0–8.2) | 7.0 (5.3–8.9) | 6.5 (5.0–8.2) | 7.2 | 8.7 | |||||
| PeCDD | 10.7 (7.1–20.1) | 11.6 (8.6–16.9) | 10.7 (8.2–15.9) | 15.7 | 13.9 | |||||
| 14HxCDD | 8.1 (5.8–12.2) | 8.2 (6.0–13.8) | 7.0 (5.6–11.3) | 8.4 | 13.9 | |||||
| 16HxCDD | 10.1 (6.5–16.6) | 11.0 (7.7–15.4) | 9.0 (7.0–13.2) | 13.1 | 11.6 | |||||
| 19HxCDD | 6.2 (5.0–8.9) | 6.8 (5.5–9.0) | 6.3 (5.2–8.4) | 4.9 | 7.7 | |||||
| HpCDD | 7.0 (5.3–9.9) | 7.6 (5.8–11.2) | 6.7 (5.2–9.0) | 3.7 | 4.3 | |||||
| OCDD | 7.8 (6.1–10.8) | 8.3 (6.6–12.0) | 7.3 (5.8–10.5) | 6.7 | 8.7 | |||||
| TEQc | 9.0 (6.7–13.1) | 9.3 (7.5–15.1) | 8.7 (6.9–12.3) | |||||||
| P25–P75, 25th–75th percentiles. Estimates were calculated on the basis of change in concentration, change in estimated mass of the congener in the body, or change in body mass after accounting for plausible background intake (Table 3). Half-lives from two previous studies, calculated from change in concentration, are included for comparison. an = 26 to 48, depending on the congener; mean age was 48.7 years at first sampling (range, 32–79 years). bn = 6; ages 41–73 years. cWHO TEQ including 7 PCDD, 10 PCDF, and 4 PCB compounds (PCBs 77, 81, 126, and 169) (van den Berg et al. 2006). | ||||||||||
Parameter coefficients, SEs, and statistical significance for the multiple regression of concentration- and mass-based apparent elimination rates of dioxin congeners on potential determinants in 56 Midland study participants with serial blood samples.
| Congener | Regression coefficient (SE) | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2005 concentration (ppt) | Chloracne (ever vs. never) | Age, (years) | 2010 BMI | Smoker in 2010 (current vs. nonsmoker) | Increase in fat mass (%) | |
| Concentration-based apparent rates | ||||||
| TCDD | –0.0004 (0.0002)** | NS | NS | NS | NS | 0.0008 (0.0004)** |
| PeCDD | 0.001 (0.0004)** | NS | NS | –0.002 (0.001)* | 0.038 (0.014)** | 0.0012 (0.0003# |
| 14HxCDD | NS | 0.029 (0.016)* | NS | –0.0032 (0.0017)* | 0.082 (0.023)# | 0.0014 (0.0005)** |
| 16HxCDD | NS | NS | NS | NS | NS | 0.0015 (0.0004)# |
| 19HxCDD | NS | NS | NS | NS | NS | NS |
| HpCDD | NS | NS | NS | NS | NS | 0.001 (0.0005)* |
| OCDD | NS | NS | NS | NS | NS | NS |
| TEQ | NS | NS | NS | NS | NS | 0.0013 (0.0003)# |
| Mass-based apparent rates | ||||||
| TCDD | –0.0004 (0.0002)* | NS | NS | NS | NS | –0.0009 (0.0004)** |
| PeCDD | 0.001 (0.0004)** | NS | NS | –0.002 (0.001)* | 0.035 (0.014)** | NS |
| 14HxCDD | NS | NS | NS | –0.0034 (0.0016)** | 0.078 (0.022)# | NS |
| 16HxCDD | NS | NS | NS | NS | NS | NS |
| 19HxCDD | NS | NS | NS | NS | NS | NS |
| HpCDD | NS | NS | NS | NS | NS | NS |
| OCDD | NS | NS | NS | NS | NS | –0.0013 (0.0005)** |
| TEQ | NS | 0.018 (0.01)* | NS | NS | NS | NS |
| NS, not significant (p > 0.1). One outlier each was identified visually for elimination rate estimates for TCDD, 14HxCDD, HpCDD, OCDD, and TEQ; two outliers were identified for PeCDD and 16HxCDD. All together, six individuals were omitted from one or more congener-specific regressions. *p < 0.1. **p < 0.05. #p < 0.01. | ||||||
Figure 1Scatter plots of the calculated mass-based apparent annual elimination rates (k) for TCDD among 56 subjects with serial blood samples versus (A) age in 2010, (B) concentration in 2005, and (C) BMI in 2010. One outlier with significant negative elimination (i.e., increase in concentration between the two sampling time points) is obvious in each scatter plot; this individual was omitted from the regression analyses for TCDD.
Figure 2Distribution of mass-based apparent elimination rates for selected PCDD congeners. Rates are reported for each congener for participants with serum lipid concentrations in 2004–2005 that are less than or equal to (≤ N95) or greater than (> N95) the NHANES 95th percentile for persons ≥ 60 years of age. Boxes extend from the 25th to the 75th percentile, horizontal bars represent the median, and whiskers extend 1.5 times the length of the interquartile range above and below the 75th and 25th percentiles; outliers were not included. p‑Values represent one-sided Fisher’s exact test of equality of medians. NS, not significant.
Figure 3Mass-based apparent elimination half-lives for TCDD estimated in participants in the present study shown with the predicted apparent mass-based elimination half-lives from two concentration-dependent toxicokinetics models for TCDD: Aylward et al. (2005) and Emond et al. (2006). The two concentration-dependent models were run at constant intakes to the specified concentrations at 63 years of age, then intake was set to zero and concentrations recorded again at age 68 years. Mass-based apparent elimination rates were calculated using Equation 1 to allow for comparison with the participant data in the present study.