Andrew L Avins1, Jeannette Y Lee, Catherine M Meyers, Michael J Barry. 1. Northern California Kaiser-Permanente Division of Research, Oakland and Departments of Medicine and Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California 94612, USA. andrew.avins@ucsf.edu
Abstract
PURPOSE: Extracts of the saw palmetto berry are used by many men in the United States as self-treatment for lower urinary tract symptoms due to benign prostatic hyperplasia. While the most recent data from double-blind clinical trials do not support efficacy superior to that of placebo, there are sparse data on saw palmetto toxicity. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 369 patients were randomized in the CAMUS (Complementary and Alternative Medicine for Urological Symptoms) trial, of whom 357 were included in this modified intent to treat analysis. Participants were randomized to 320, 640 and 960 mg daily of an ethanolic saw palmetto extract or to an identical-appearing placebo in an escalating manner at 6-month intervals for a total of 18 months of followup. Adverse event assessments, vital signs, and blood and urine laboratory tests were obtained at regular intervals. RESULTS: There were no statistically significant differences between the groups in the rates of serious or nonserious adverse events, changes in vital signs, digital prostate examination findings or study withdrawal rates. Overall, there were no significant intergroup differences in laboratory test abnormalities, while differences in individual laboratory tests were rare and small in magnitude. No evidence of significant dose-response phenomena was identified. CONCLUSIONS: The saw palmetto extract used in the CAMUS trial showed no evidence of toxicity at doses up to 3 times the usual clinical dose during an 18-month period.
RCT Entities:
PURPOSE: Extracts of the saw palmetto berry are used by many men in the United States as self-treatment for lower urinary tract symptoms due to benign prostatic hyperplasia. While the most recent data from double-blind clinical trials do not support efficacy superior to that of placebo, there are sparse data on saw palmettotoxicity. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 369 patients were randomized in the CAMUS (Complementary and Alternative Medicine for Urological Symptoms) trial, of whom 357 were included in this modified intent to treat analysis. Participants were randomized to 320, 640 and 960 mg daily of an ethanolic saw palmetto extract or to an identical-appearing placebo in an escalating manner at 6-month intervals for a total of 18 months of followup. Adverse event assessments, vital signs, and blood and urine laboratory tests were obtained at regular intervals. RESULTS: There were no statistically significant differences between the groups in the rates of serious or nonserious adverse events, changes in vital signs, digital prostate examination findings or study withdrawal rates. Overall, there were no significant intergroup differences in laboratory test abnormalities, while differences in individual laboratory tests were rare and small in magnitude. No evidence of significant dose-response phenomena was identified. CONCLUSIONS: The saw palmetto extract used in the CAMUS trial showed no evidence of toxicity at doses up to 3 times the usual clinical dose during an 18-month period.
Authors: J C Carraro; J P Raynaud; G Koch; G D Chisholm; F Di Silverio; P Teillac; F C Da Silva; J Cauquil; D K Chopin; F C Hamdy; M Hanus; D Hauri; A Kalinteris; J Marencak; A Perier; P Perrin Journal: Prostate Date: 1996-10 Impact factor: 4.104
Authors: Zeping Hu; Xiaoxia Yang; Paul Chi Lui Ho; Sui Yung Chan; Paul Wan Sia Heng; Eli Chan; Wei Duan; Hwee Ling Koh; Shufeng Zhou Journal: Drugs Date: 2005 Impact factor: 9.546
Authors: Andrew L Avins; Stephen Bent; Suzanne Staccone; Evelyn Badua; Amy Padula; Harley Goldberg; John Neuhaus; Esther Hudes; Katusto Shinohara; Christopher Kane Journal: Complement Ther Med Date: 2008-02-20 Impact factor: 2.446
Authors: Stephen Bent; Christopher Kane; Katsuto Shinohara; John Neuhaus; Esther S Hudes; Harley Goldberg; Andrew L Avins Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2006-02-09 Impact factor: 91.245