OBJECTIVE: The long-term use of milrinone is associated with increased mortality in chronic heart failure. A recent meta-analysis suggested that it might increase mortality in patients undergoing cardiac surgery. The authors conducted an updated meta-analysis of randomized trials in patients undergoing cardiac surgery to determine if milrinone impacted survival. DESIGN: A meta-analysis. SETTING: Hospitals. PARTICIPANTS: One thousand thirty-seven patients from 20 randomized trials. INTERVENTIONS: None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Biomed, Central, PubMed, EMBASE, the Cochrane central register of clinical trials, and conference proceedings were searched for randomized trials that compared milrinone versus placebo or any other control in adult and pediatric patients undergoing cardiac surgery. Authors of trials that did not include mortality data were contacted. Only trials for which mortality data were available were included. Overall analysis showed no difference in mortality between patients receiving milrinone versus control (12/554 [2.2%] in the milrinone group v 10/483 [2.1%] in the control arm; relative risk [RR] = 1.15; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.55-2.43; p = 0.7) or in analysis restricted to adults (11/364 [3%] in the milrinone group v 9/371 [2.4%] in the control arm; RR = 1.17; 95% CI, 0.54-2.53; p = 0.7). Sensitivity analyses in trials with a low risk of bias showed a trend toward an increase in mortality with milrinone (8/153 [5.2%] in the milrinone arm v 2/152 [1.3%] in the control arm; RR = 2.71; 95% CI, 0.82-9; p for effect = 0.10). CONCLUSIONS: Despite theoretic concerns for increased mortality with intravenous milrinone in patients undergoing cardiac surgery, the authors were unable to confirm an adverse effect on survival. However, sensitivity analysis of high-quality trials showed a trend toward increased mortality with milrinone.
OBJECTIVE: The long-term use of milrinone is associated with increased mortality in chronic heart failure. A recent meta-analysis suggested that it might increase mortality in patients undergoing cardiac surgery. The authors conducted an updated meta-analysis of randomized trials in patients undergoing cardiac surgery to determine if milrinone impacted survival. DESIGN: A meta-analysis. SETTING: Hospitals. PARTICIPANTS: One thousand thirty-seven patients from 20 randomized trials. INTERVENTIONS: None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Biomed, Central, PubMed, EMBASE, the Cochrane central register of clinical trials, and conference proceedings were searched for randomized trials that compared milrinone versus placebo or any other control in adult and pediatric patients undergoing cardiac surgery. Authors of trials that did not include mortality data were contacted. Only trials for which mortality data were available were included. Overall analysis showed no difference in mortality between patients receiving milrinone versus control (12/554 [2.2%] in the milrinone group v 10/483 [2.1%] in the control arm; relative risk [RR] = 1.15; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.55-2.43; p = 0.7) or in analysis restricted to adults (11/364 [3%] in the milrinone group v 9/371 [2.4%] in the control arm; RR = 1.17; 95% CI, 0.54-2.53; p = 0.7). Sensitivity analyses in trials with a low risk of bias showed a trend toward an increase in mortality with milrinone (8/153 [5.2%] in the milrinone arm v 2/152 [1.3%] in the control arm; RR = 2.71; 95% CI, 0.82-9; p for effect = 0.10). CONCLUSIONS: Despite theoretic concerns for increased mortality with intravenous milrinone in patients undergoing cardiac surgery, the authors were unable to confirm an adverse effect on survival. However, sensitivity analysis of high-quality trials showed a trend toward increased mortality with milrinone.
Authors: Emilie Jean-St-Michel; Devin Chetan; Steven M Schwartz; Glen S Van Arsdell; Alejandro A Floh; Osami Honjo; Jennifer Conway Journal: Pediatr Cardiol Date: 2015-09-22 Impact factor: 1.655
Authors: Simona Silvetti; Teresa Greco; Ambra Licia Di Prima; Marta Mucchetti; Castro Maria de Lurdes; Laura Pasin; Mara Scandroglio; Giovanni Landoni; Alberto Zangrillo Journal: Clin Res Cardiol Date: 2013-12-25 Impact factor: 5.460
Authors: Nathan Brunner; Vinicio A de Jesus Perez; Alice Richter; François Haddad; André Denault; Vanessa Rojas; Ke Yuan; Mark Orcholski; Xiaobo Liao Journal: Pulm Circ Date: 2014-03 Impact factor: 3.017
Authors: Anders Aneman; Nicholas Brechot; Daniel Brodie; Frances Colreavy; John Fraser; Charles Gomersall; Peter McCanny; Peter Hasse Moller-Sorensen; Jukka Takala; Kamen Valchanov; Michael Vallely Journal: Intensive Care Med Date: 2018-04-30 Impact factor: 17.440
Authors: Islam Mohammad Shehata; Tiffany D Odell; Amir Elhassan; Maxim Spektor; Ivan Urits; Omar Viswanath; George M Jeha; Elyse M Cornett; Alan D Kaye Journal: Cardiol Ther Date: 2020-12-23
Authors: André Y Denault; Jean S Bussières; Ramiro Arellano; Barry Finegan; Paul Gavra; François Haddad; Anne Q N Nguyen; France Varin; Annik Fortier; Sylvie Levesque; Yanfen Shi; Mahsa Elmi-Sarabi; Jean-Claude Tardif; Louis P Perrault; Jean Lambert Journal: Can J Anaesth Date: 2016-07-28 Impact factor: 6.713
Authors: Ewa M Kucewicz-Czech; Tomasz Maciejewski; Barbara Budziarz; Tadeusz Kołodziej; Kazimierz Kiermasz; Leszek Machej Journal: Kardiochir Torakochirurgia Pol Date: 2018-03-28
Authors: Geert Koster; Hanneke J Bekema; Jørn Wetterslev; Christian Gluud; Frederik Keus; Iwan C C van der Horst Journal: Intensive Care Med Date: 2016-07-22 Impact factor: 17.440