Literature DB >> 23062280

Differentiating benign from malignant solid breast lesions: combined utility of conventional ultrasound and contrast-enhanced ultrasound in comparison with magnetic resonance imaging.

Jing Du1, Lin Wang, Cai-Feng Wan, Jia Hua, Hua Fang, Jie Chen, Feng-Hua Li.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To prospectively evaluate the diagnostic efficacy of conventional ultrasound (US), contrast-enhanced US (CEUS), the combined use of two modalities, and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in the differentiation of focal solid breast lesions.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: 61 patients with BI-RADS category 3-5 breast lesions detected at conventional US underwent CEUS and MRI. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was performed to evaluate the diagnostic performance of conventional US, CEUS, combination of two modalities and MRI for discrimination between benign and malignant breast lesions.
RESULTS: Tissue specimens of 61 breast lesions were obtained either from surgical resection (n=46) or from needle biopsy (n=15). Histopathologic diagnosis revealed 28 benign and 33 malignant lesions. The diagnostic performance of conventional US and CEUS in differentiating benign from malignant breast lesions showed no significant difference (P=0.741). The combination of two modalities significantly improved the diagnostic accuracy compared with either conventional US or CEUS alone (P=0.031 and P=0.012, respectively). The area under the ROC curve (A(z)) value for the combined use of two modalities for discrimination between benign and malignant breast lesions was 0.94, and that for MRI was 0.91, whereas no statistical difference was found between them (P=0.296).
CONCLUSION: The combined use of conventional US and CEUS has a better diagnostic performance than either method alone and displays good agreement with MRI in the differentiation capability for benign and malignant breast lesions.
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23062280     DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2012.09.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Radiol        ISSN: 0720-048X            Impact factor:   3.528


  25 in total

1.  Impact of parametric imaging on contrast-enhanced ultrasound of breast cancer.

Authors:  Aya Noro; Takashi Nakamura; Toshiko Hirai; Masayo Haga; Toyoki Kobayashi; Akinobu Hayashi; Yuji Kozuka; Tokiko Nakai; Toru Ogura; Tomoko Ogawa
Journal:  J Med Ultrason (2001)       Date:  2016-01-22       Impact factor: 1.314

2.  Ultrasensitive Ultrasound Microvessel Imaging for Characterizing Benign and Malignant Breast Tumors.

Authors:  Ping Gong; Pengfei Song; Chengwu Huang; U-Wai Lok; Shanshan Tang; Yue Yu; Duane D Meixner; Kathryn J Ruddy; Karthik Ghosh; Robert T Fazzio; Wenwu Ling; Shigao Chen
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2019-09-14       Impact factor: 2.998

3.  Papillary breast lesions on contrast-enhanced ultrasound: morphological enhancement patterns and diagnostic strategy.

Authors:  Han-Sheng Xia; Xi Wang; Hong Ding; Jie-Xian Wen; Pei-Li Fan; Wen-Ping Wang
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2014-08-23       Impact factor: 5.315

4.  Quantitative Multiparametric Breast Ultrasound: Application of Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound and Elastography Leads to an Improved Differentiation of Benign and Malignant Lesions.

Authors:  Panagiotis Kapetas; Paola Clauser; Ramona Woitek; Georg J Wengert; Mathias Lazar; Katja Pinker; Thomas H Helbich; Pascal A T Baltzer
Journal:  Invest Radiol       Date:  2019-05       Impact factor: 6.016

5.  Comparison of transducers with different frequencies in breast contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) using SonoVue as contrast agent.

Authors:  Yong-Mei Wang; Wei Fan; Kai Zhang; Li Zhang; Zhen Tan; Rong Ma
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2016-05-04       Impact factor: 3.039

6.  Homogeneously enhancing breast lesions on contrast enhanced US: differential diagnosis by conventional and contrast enhanced US findings.

Authors:  Ritsuko Fujimitsu; Mikiko Shimakura; Hiroshi Urakawa; Ayako Morita; Yoshinobu Shinagawa; Keiko Sakamoto; Kengo Yoshimitsu
Journal:  Jpn J Radiol       Date:  2016-05-03       Impact factor: 2.374

Review 7.  Contrast-enhanced ultrasound features of breast capillary hemangioma: a case report and review of literature.

Authors:  Chen-Pin Chou; Jer-Shyung Huang; Jyh-Seng Wang; Huay-Ben Pan
Journal:  J Ultrasound       Date:  2021-01-06

8.  Does contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) play a better role in diagnosis of breast lesions with calcification? A comparison with MRI.

Authors:  Jiamin Pan; Wenjuan Tong; Jia Luo; Jinyu Liang; Fushun Pan; Yanling Zheng; Xiaoyan Xie
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2020-06-02       Impact factor: 3.039

9.  Can Doppler or contrast-enhanced ultrasound analysis add diagnostically important information about the nature of breast lesions?

Authors:  Daniela Stanzani; Luciano F Chala; Nestor de Barros; Giovanni G Cerri; Maria Cristina Chammas
Journal:  Clinics (Sao Paulo)       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 2.365

10.  Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasonography Features of Breast Malignancies with Different Sizes: Correlation with Prognostic Factors.

Authors:  Li-Xia Zhao; Hui Liu; Qing Wei; Guang Xu; Jian Wu; Hui-Xiong Xu; Rong Wu; Huan Pu
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2015-12-31       Impact factor: 3.411

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.