Literature DB >> 23062144

What is the optimal number of implants for fixed reconstructions: a systematic review.

Guido Heydecke1, Marcel Zwahlen, Ailsa Nicol, Davide Nisand, Michael Payer, Frank Renouard, Philipp Grohmann, Sven Mühlemann, Tim Joda.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To assess the 5-year and 10-year survival and complication rates of implant-supported fixed reconstructions in partially and totally edentulous patients with regard to the optimal number and distribution of dental implants.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: This review was designed as a systematic review of the literature. A search strategy was developed and executed using an electronic and selective hand search for English-language articles in Dental Journals limited to human clinical trials. Search terms were grouped into categories for "problem" - "intervention" - "outcome". For articles retrieved by this search, abstracts were screened by two reviewers based on the inclusion criteria. Selected articles were then obtained in full texts. Finally, the selection based on inclusion/exclusion criteria was repeated for the full-text articles.
RESULTS: Of the 210 titles retrieved by the search, 51 were selected for full-text review based on the information given in the abstract. From the full-text articles, a total of nine studies were included for this systematic review. In meta-analysis, prosthetic survival rates over 5 and 10 years for partial Fixed Dental Prostheses (FDPs) on two to four implants were estimated as 98.9% (95% CI: 98.5-99.2%) and as 97.8% (95% CI: 96.9-98.4%) respectively. A survival rate for maxillary Full-Arch Fixed Dental Prostheses (FAFDPs) on four to six implants after 5 years was assessed as 97.5% (95% CI: 94.1-98.9%) and a survival rate after 10 years as 95.0% (95% CI: 88.5-97.9%). The result for the survival rates in case of mandibular FAFDPs on four to six implants after 5 years was 97.9% (95% CI: 96.3-98.8%) and after 10 years 95.9% (95% CI: 92.8-97.7%). Specific implant-to-replaced-unit-ratios were not available in any of the studies.
CONCLUSION: For implant-supported FAFDPs, using 4-6 implants is a well-documented treatment option with high estimated 5-year survival of the construction. It is unclear whether three implants for supporting a FAFDP will achieve similar survival rates. The RCTs needed that report implant-to-replaced-units-ratios for partial FDPs and include 3 vs. 4-6 implants for supporting a FAFDP in the mandible.
© 2012 John Wiley & Sons A/S.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23062144     DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2012.02548.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Oral Implants Res        ISSN: 0905-7161            Impact factor:   5.977


  10 in total

1.  The all-on-four concept may be a viable treatment option for edentulous rehabilitation.

Authors:  Kelvin I Afrashtehfar
Journal:  Evid Based Dent       Date:  2016-06

Review 2.  The use of three implants to support a fixed prosthesis in the management of the edentulous mandible: a systematic review.

Authors:  Murtaza Hirani; Maria Devine; Olamide Obisesan; Cathy Bryant
Journal:  Int J Implant Dent       Date:  2022-06-17

3.  Histological examination and clinical evaluation of the jawbone of an adult patient with cleidocranial dysplasia: a case report.

Authors:  Sigmar Schnutenhaus; Ralph G Luthardt; Heike Rudolph; Werner Götz
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Pathol       Date:  2015-07-01

Review 4.  A systematic review and meta-analysis of removable and fixed implant-supported prostheses in edentulous jaws: post-loading implant loss.

Authors:  Jaana-Sophia Kern; Thomas Kern; Stefan Wolfart; Nicole Heussen
Journal:  Clin Oral Implants Res       Date:  2015-02-09       Impact factor: 5.977

5.  Fixed Full Arches Supported by Tapered Implants with Knife-Edge Thread Design and Nanostructured, Calcium-Incorporated Surface: A Short-Term Prospective Clinical Study.

Authors:  Soheil Bechara; Algirdas Lukosiunas; Giorgio Andrea Dolcini; Ricardas Kubilius
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2017-01-29       Impact factor: 3.411

6.  Combining Intraoral and Face Scans for the Design and Fabrication of Computer-Assisted Design/Computer-Assisted Manufacturing (CAD/CAM) Polyether-Ether-Ketone (PEEK) Implant-Supported Bars for Maxillary Overdentures.

Authors:  Francesco Mangano; Carlo Mangano; Bidzina Margiani; Oleg Admakin
Journal:  Scanning       Date:  2019-08-22       Impact factor: 1.932

7.  Prosthetic rehabilitation of a patient with cleidocranial dysplasia using dental implants-a clinical report.

Authors:  Sigmar Schnutenhaus; Werner Götz; Ralph G Luthardt
Journal:  Int J Implant Dent       Date:  2021-01-22

8.  Case Series on the Long-Term Effect of Three Different Types of Maxillary Implant-Supported Overdentures on Clinical Outcomes and Complications.

Authors:  Emitis Natali Naeini; Hugo De Bruyn; Ewald M Bronkhorst; Jan D'haese
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-04-18       Impact factor: 4.964

9.  Complications of Fixed Full-Arch Implant-Supported Metal-Ceramic Prostheses.

Authors:  Ignacio Gonzalez-Gonzalez; Hector deLlanos-Lanchares; Aritza Brizuela-Velasco; Jose-Antonio Alvarez-Riesgo; Santiago Llorente-Pendas; Mariano Herrero-Climent; Angel Alvarez-Arenal
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-06-14       Impact factor: 3.390

10.  Rehabilitation of the Completely Edentulous Mandible by All-on-Four Treatment Concept: A Retrospective Cohort Study with Up to 10 Years Follow-Up.

Authors:  Tommaso Grandi; Luca Signorini
Journal:  Medicina (Kaunas)       Date:  2021-12-22       Impact factor: 2.430

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.