Literature DB >> 23060046

Fragile X-related element 2 methylation analysis may provide a suitable option for inclusion of fragile X syndrome and/or sex chromosome aneuploidy into newborn screening: a technical validation study.

Yoshimi Inaba1, Amy S Herlihy, Charles E Schwartz, Cindy Skinner, Quang M Bui, Joanna Cobb, Elva Z Shi, David Francis, Alison Arvaj, David J Amor, Kate Pope, Tiffany Wotton, Jonathan Cohen, Jacqueline K Hewitt, Randi J Hagerman, Sylvia A Metcalfe, John L Hopper, Danuta Z Loesch, Howard R Slater, David E Godler.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: We show that a novel fragile X-related epigenetic element 2 FMR1 methylation test can be used along with a test for sex-determining region Y (SRY) to provide the option of combined fragile X syndrome and sex chromosome aneuploidy newborn screening.
METHODS: Fragile X-related epigenetic element 2, SRY, and FMR1 CGG repeat analyses were performed on blood and saliva DNA, and in adult and newborn blood spots. The cohort consisted of 159 controls (CGG <40), 187 premutation (CGG 56-170), and 242 full-mutation (CGG ~200-2,000) males and females, 106 sex chromosome aneuploidy individuals, and 151 cytogenetically normal controls.
RESULTS: At the 0.435 threshold, fragile X-related epigenetic element 2 analysis in males was robust on both blood DNA and newborn blood spots, with specificity and sensitivity of ~100% for full-mutation genotype. In females, the specificity was 99%, whereas half of full-mutation females were above the 0.435 threshold in both blood DNA and newborn blood spots. Furthermore, at this threshold, the test could not differentiate individuals with Klinefelter syndrome from female controls without using the SRY marker. When combined with SRY analysis, the test was consistent with most results for sex chromosome aneuploidies from karyotyping.
CONCLUSION: Setting specific thresholds for fragile X-related epigenetic element 2 analysis and including the SRY marker provides the option to either include or exclude detection of sex chromosome aneuploidies as part of fragile X syndrome newborn screening.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23060046     DOI: 10.1038/gim.2012.134

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genet Med        ISSN: 1098-3600            Impact factor:   8.822


  11 in total

Review 1.  Early neurodevelopmental and medical profile in children with sex chromosome trisomies: Background for the prospective eXtraordinarY babies study to identify early risk factors and targets for intervention.

Authors:  Nicole Tartaglia; Susan Howell; Shanlee Davis; Karen Kowal; Tanea Tanda; Mariah Brown; Cristina Boada; Amanda Alston; Leah Crawford; Talia Thompson; Sophie van Rijn; Rebecca Wilson; Jennifer Janusz; Judith Ross
Journal:  Am J Med Genet C Semin Med Genet       Date:  2020-06-07       Impact factor: 3.908

2.  Novel methylation markers of the dysexecutive-psychiatric phenotype in FMR1 premutation women.

Authors:  Kim M Cornish; Claudine M Kraan; Quang Minh Bui; Mark A Bellgrove; Sylvia A Metcalfe; Julian N Trollor; Darren R Hocking; Howard R Slater; Yoshimi Inaba; Xin Li; Alison D Archibald; Erin Turbitt; Jonathan Cohen; David E Godler
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2015-03-25       Impact factor: 9.910

3.  Relationships between age and epi-genotype of the FMR1 exon 1/intron 1 boundary are consistent with non-random X-chromosome inactivation in FM individuals, with the selection for the unmethylated state being most significant between birth and puberty.

Authors:  David E Godler; Yoshimi Inaba; Elva Z Shi; Cindy Skinner; Quang M Bui; David Francis; David J Amor; John L Hopper; Danuta Z Loesch; Randi J Hagerman; Charles E Schwartz; Howard R Slater
Journal:  Hum Mol Genet       Date:  2013-01-10       Impact factor: 6.150

4.  Going back to the future with Guthrie-powered epigenome-wide association studies.

Authors:  Mark N Cruickshank; James Pitt; Jeffrey M Craig
Journal:  Genome Med       Date:  2012-10-30       Impact factor: 11.117

Review 5.  Detection of skewed X-chromosome inactivation in Fragile X syndrome and X chromosome aneuploidy using quantitative melt analysis.

Authors:  David E Godler; Yoshimi Inaba; Charles E Schwartz; Quang M Bui; Elva Z Shi; Xin Li; Amy S Herlihy; Cindy Skinner; Randi J Hagerman; David Francis; David J Amor; Sylvia A Metcalfe; John L Hopper; Howard R Slater
Journal:  Expert Rev Mol Med       Date:  2015-07-01       Impact factor: 5.600

6.  Developmental Emergence of Phenotypes in the Auditory Brainstem Nuclei of Fmr1 Knockout Mice.

Authors:  Sarah E Rotschafer; Karina S Cramer
Journal:  eNeuro       Date:  2017-12-27

7.  Brain structure and intragenic DNA methylation are correlated, and predict executive dysfunction in fragile X premutation females.

Authors:  A L Shelton; K M Cornish; S Kolbe; M Clough; H R Slater; X Li; C M Kraan; Q M Bui; D E Godler; J Fielding
Journal:  Transl Psychiatry       Date:  2016-12-13       Impact factor: 6.222

8.  Intragenic DNA methylation in buccal epithelial cells and intellectual functioning in a paediatric cohort of males with fragile X.

Authors:  Marta Arpone; Emma K Baker; Lesley Bretherton; Minh Bui; Xin Li; Simon Whitaker; Cheryl Dissanayake; Jonathan Cohen; Chriselle Hickerton; Carolyn Rogers; Mike Field; Justine Elliott; Solange M Aliaga; Ling Ling; David Francis; Stephen J C Hearps; Matthew F Hunter; David J Amor; David E Godler
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-02-26       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  Abnormally Methylated FMR1 in Absence of a Detectable Full Mutation in a U.S.A Patient Cohort Referred for Fragile X Testing.

Authors:  Charles H Hensel; Rena J Vanzo; Megan M Martin; Ling Ling; Solange M Aliaga; Minh Bui; David I Francis; Hope Twede; Michael H Field; Jonathon W Morison; David J Amor; David E Godler
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-10-25       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  DNA methylation and behavioral dysfunction in males with 47,XXY and 49,XXXXY: a pilot study.

Authors:  Richard S Lee; Sophia Q Song; Henri M Garrison-Desany; Jenny L Carey; Patricia Lasutschinkow; Andrew Zabel; Joseph Bressler; Andrea Gropman; Carole Samango-Sprouse
Journal:  Clin Epigenetics       Date:  2021-07-01       Impact factor: 6.551

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.