Literature DB >> 23059538

The quest for probiotic effector molecules--unraveling strain specificity at the molecular level.

I-Chiao Lee1, Satoru Tomita, Michiel Kleerebezem, Peter A Bron.   

Abstract

Pharmaceutical agents are widely applied for the treatment of gastrointestinal (and systemic) disorders and their role as modulators of host cell responses is relatively well characterized. By contrast, we are only beginning to understand the molecular mechanisms by which health-promoting, probiotic bacteria act as host cell modulators. The last decade has seen a rapid development of the genomics field for the widely applied probiotic genus Lactobacillus, and nowadays dozens of full genome sequences are available, as well as sophisticated post genomic and genetic engineering tools. This development has enabled comparative (functional) genomics approaches to identify the bacterial effector molecules involved in molecular communication with the host system that may underlie the probiotic effects observed. These efforts can also be complemented with dedicated mutagenesis approaches to eliminate or alter these effector molecules, followed by assessment of the host interaction consequences thereof, allowing the elucidation of the molecular mechanisms involved in probiotic health effects. Many of these approaches have pinpointed that the Lactobacillus cell envelope contains several effector molecules that are pivotal in the direct signaling capacity of these bacteria that underlies their immunomodulatory effects, including lipoteichoic acid, peptidoglycan, and (glyco)proteins. Moreover, the cell envelope contains several compounds such as wall teichoic acid and capsular polysaccharides that may not be involved in direct signaling to the host cell, but still affect signaling through shielding of other bacterial effector molecules. Initial structural studies revealed subtle strain- and species-specific biochemical differences in the canonical cell envelope compounds that are involved in these host interactions. These biochemical variations include the degree and positioning of d-alanyl and glycosyl substitution in lipoteichoic acids, and acetylation of peptidoglycan. Furthermore, specific peptides derived from peptidoglycan and envelope associated (glyco)proteins were recently identified as potent immunomodulators. The latter findings are exciting in the light of the possibility of more pharmacological application of these bioactive probiotic molecules, and especially cost-effective production and targeted delivery of bioactive peptides seems to emerge as a feasible strategy to harness this knowledge.
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23059538     DOI: 10.1016/j.phrs.2012.09.010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pharmacol Res        ISSN: 1043-6618            Impact factor:   7.658


  29 in total

1.  Strain-Specific Features of Extracellular Polysaccharides and Their Impact on Lactobacillus plantarum-Host Interactions.

Authors:  I-Chiao Lee; Graziano Caggianiello; Iris I van Swam; Nico Taverne; Marjolein Meijerink; Peter A Bron; Giuseppe Spano; Michiel Kleerebezem
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2016-06-13       Impact factor: 4.792

2.  Immunomodulation of monocytes by probiotic and selected lactic Acid bacteria.

Authors:  Hanne Jensen; Signe Marie Drømtorp; Lars Axelsson; Stine Grimmer
Journal:  Probiotics Antimicrob Proteins       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 4.609

3.  In-vitro GIT Tolerance of Microencapsulated Bifidobacterium bifidum ATCC 35914 Using Polysaccharide-Protein Matrix.

Authors:  Rabia Iqbal; Tahir Zahoor; Nuzhat Huma; Amer Jamil; Gülhan Ünlü
Journal:  Probiotics Antimicrob Proteins       Date:  2019-09       Impact factor: 4.609

4.  Structure and biological activities of a hexosamine-rich cell wall polysaccharide isolated from the probiotic Lactobacillus farciminis.

Authors:  Emmanuel Maes; Irina Sadovskaya; Mathilde Lévêque; Elisabeth Elass-Rochard; Bruno Payré; Thierry Grard; Vassilia Théodorou; Yann Guérardel; Muriel Mercier-Bonin
Journal:  Glycoconj J       Date:  2019-01-12       Impact factor: 2.916

5.  Levilactobacillus brevis KU15151 Inhibits Staphylococcus aureus Lipoteichoic Acid-Induced Inflammation in RAW 264.7 Macrophages.

Authors:  Won-Ju Kim; Hyung-Seok Yu; Na-Kyoung Lee; Hyun-Dong Paik
Journal:  Probiotics Antimicrob Proteins       Date:  2022-05-13       Impact factor: 4.609

Review 6.  Stress Physiology of Lactic Acid Bacteria.

Authors:  Konstantinos Papadimitriou; Ángel Alegría; Peter A Bron; Maria de Angelis; Marco Gobbetti; Michiel Kleerebezem; José A Lemos; Daniel M Linares; Paul Ross; Catherine Stanton; Francesca Turroni; Douwe van Sinderen; Pekka Varmanen; Marco Ventura; Manuel Zúñiga; Effie Tsakalidou; Jan Kok
Journal:  Microbiol Mol Biol Rev       Date:  2016-07-27       Impact factor: 11.056

7.  Distinct immunomodulation of bone marrow-derived dendritic cell responses to Lactobacillus plantarum WCFS1 by two different polysaccharides isolated from Lactobacillus rhamnosus LOCK 0900.

Authors:  Sabina Górska; Martin Schwarzer; Wojciech Jachymek; Dagmar Srutkova; Ewa Brzozowska; Hana Kozakova; Andrzej Gamian
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2014-08-08       Impact factor: 4.792

8.  GtfA and GtfB are both required for protein O-glycosylation in Lactobacillus plantarum.

Authors:  I-Chiao Lee; Iris I van Swam; Satoru Tomita; Pierre Morsomme; Thomas Rolain; Pascal Hols; Michiel Kleerebezem; Peter A Bron
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2014-02-14       Impact factor: 3.490

9.  Draft Genome Sequence of Lactobacillus casei Lbs2.

Authors:  Swati Bhowmick; Mathu Malar; Abhishek Das; Bhupesh Kumar Thakur; Piu Saha; Santasabuj Das; H M Rashmi; Virender K Batish; Sunita Grover; Sucheta Tripathy
Journal:  Genome Announc       Date:  2014-12-24

10.  The effect of cell surface components on adhesion ability of Lactobacillus rhamnosus.

Authors:  Magdalena Polak-Berecka; Adam Waśko; Roman Paduch; Tomasz Skrzypek; Anna Sroka-Bartnicka
Journal:  Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek       Date:  2014-08-05       Impact factor: 2.271

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.