Literature DB >> 23057673

Computational modeling of a forward lunge: towards a better understanding of the function of the cruciate ligaments.

Tine Alkjaer1, Maja R Wieland, Michael S Andersen, Erik B Simonsen, John Rasmussen.   

Abstract

This study investigated the function of the cruciate ligaments during a forward lunge movement. The mechanical roles of the anterior and posterior cruciate ligament (ACL, PCL) during sagittal plane movements, such as forward lunging, are unclear. A forward lunge movement contains a knee joint flexion and extension that is controlled by the quadriceps muscle. The contraction of the quadriceps can cause anterior tibial translation, which may strain the ACL at knee joint positions close to full extension. However, recent findings suggest that it is the PCL rather than the ACL which is strained during forward lunging. Thus, the purpose of the present study was to establish a musculoskeletal model of the forward lunge to computationally investigate the complete mechanical force equilibrium of the tibia during the movement to examine the loading pattern of the cruciate ligaments. A healthy female was selected from a group of healthy subjects who all performed a forward lunge on a force platform, targeting a knee flexion angle of 90°. Skin-markers were placed on anatomical landmarks on the subject and the movement was recorded by five video cameras. The three-dimensional kinematic data describing the forward lunge movement were extracted and used to develop a biomechanical model of the lunge movement. The model comprised two legs including femur, crus, rigid foot segments and the pelvis. Each leg had 35 independent muscle units, which were recruited according to a minimum fatigue criterion. This approach allowed a full understanding of the mechanical equilibrium of the knee joint, which revealed that the PCL had an important stabilizing role in the forward lunge movement. In contrast, the ACL did not have any significant mechanical function during the lunge movement. Furthermore, the results showed that m. gluteus maximus may play a role as a knee stabilizer in addition to the hamstring muscles.
© 2012 The Authors. Journal of Anatomy © 2012 Anatomical Society.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23057673      PMCID: PMC3512282          DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-7580.2012.01569.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Anat        ISSN: 0021-8782            Impact factor:   2.610


  37 in total

1.  Hamstrings cocontraction reduces internal rotation, anterior translation, and anterior cruciate ligament load in weight-bearing flexion.

Authors:  B A MacWilliams; D R Wilson; J D DesJardins; J Romero; E Y Chao
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 3.494

2.  Gender comparison of hip muscle activity during single-leg landing.

Authors:  Bohdanna T Zazulak; Patricia L Ponce; Stephen J Straub; Michael J Medvecky; Lori Avedisian; Timothy E Hewett
Journal:  J Orthop Sports Phys Ther       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 4.751

3.  The geometry of the tibial plateau and its influence on the biomechanics of the tibiofemoral joint.

Authors:  Javad Hashemi; Naveen Chandrashekar; Brian Gill; Bruce D Beynnon; James R Slauterbeck; Robert C Schutt; Hossein Mansouri; Eugene Dabezies
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 5.284

4.  Strain within the anterior cruciate ligament during hamstring and quadriceps activity.

Authors:  P Renström; S W Arms; T S Stanwyck; R J Johnson; M H Pope
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  1986 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 6.202

5.  Lower extremity compensatory neuromuscular and biomechanical adaptations 2 to 11 years after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Authors:  John Nyland; Scott Klein; David N M Caborn
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  2010-06-16       Impact factor: 4.772

6.  Lines of action and moment arms of the major force-carrying structures crossing the human knee joint.

Authors:  W Herzog; L J Read
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  1993-04       Impact factor: 2.610

7.  Determination of muscle and joint forces: a new technique to solve the indeterminate problem.

Authors:  K N An; B M Kwak; E Y Chao; B F Morrey
Journal:  J Biomech Eng       Date:  1984-11       Impact factor: 2.097

8.  Anterior-posterior and rotational displacement of the tibia elicited by quadriceps contraction.

Authors:  S Hirokawa; M Solomonow; Y Lu; Z P Lou; R D'Ambrosia
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  1992 May-Jun       Impact factor: 6.202

9.  Experimental muscle pain during a forward lunge--the effects on knee joint dynamics and electromyographic activity.

Authors:  M Henriksen; T Alkjaer; E B Simonsen; H Bliddal
Journal:  Br J Sports Med       Date:  2008-08-21       Impact factor: 13.800

10.  Joint forces in extension of the knee. Analysis of a mechanical model.

Authors:  R Nisell; G Németh; H Ohlsén
Journal:  Acta Orthop Scand       Date:  1986-02
View more
  4 in total

1.  An Open-Source Toolbox for Surrogate Modeling of Joint Contact Mechanics.

Authors:  Ilan Eskinazi; Benjamin J Fregly
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  2015-07-13       Impact factor: 4.538

Review 2.  Loading Patterns of the Posterior Cruciate Ligament in the Healthy Knee: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  S H Hosseini Nasab; Renate List; Katja Oberhofer; Sandro F Fucentese; Jess G Snedeker; William R Taylor
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-11-23       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 3.  Muscle Force Contributions to Anterior Cruciate Ligament Loading.

Authors:  Nirav Maniar; Michael H Cole; Adam L Bryant; David A Opar
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2022-04-18       Impact factor: 11.928

4.  Forward lunge before and after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: Faster movement but unchanged knee joint biomechanics.

Authors:  Tine Alkjær; Kenneth B Smale; Teresa E Flaxman; Ida F Marker; Erik B Simonsen; Daniel L Benoit; Michael R Krogsgaard
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-01-24       Impact factor: 3.240

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.