| Literature DB >> 23056365 |
Abstract
The fluctuation of population size has not been well studied in the previous studies of theoretical linkage disequilibrium (LD) expectation. In this study, an improved theoretical prediction of LD decay was derived to account for the effects of changes in effective population sizes. The equation was used to estimate effective population size (N(e)) assuming a constant N(e) and LD at equilibrium, and these N(e) estimates implied the past changes of N(e) for a certain number of generations until equilibrium, which differed based on recombination rate. As the influence of recent population history on the N(e) estimates is larger than old population history, recent changes in population size can be inferred more accurately than old changes. The theoretical predictions based on this improved expression showed accurate agreement with the simulated values. When applied to human genome data, the detailed recent history of human populations was obtained. The inferred past population history of each population showed good correspondence with historical studies. Specifically, four populations (three African ancestries and one Mexican ancestry) showed population growth that was significantly less than that of other populations, and two populations originated from China showed prominent exponential growth. During the examination of overall LD decay in the human genome, a selection pressure on chromosome 14, the gephyrin gene, was observed in all populations.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2012 PMID: 23056365 PMCID: PMC3462787 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0046603
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
The generation (age) until equilibrium (when the difference between generation becomes less than 1/(2Ne)) depending on Ne and recombination rate (c)).
| Ne | 100 | 500 | 1000 | 5000 | 10000 | |||||
| c | age | E(r2) | age | E(r2) | age | E(r2) | age | E(r2) | age | E(r2) |
| 0.5 | 4 | 0.00831 | 5 | 0.00167 | 11 | 0.00083 | 13 | 0.00017 | 14 | 0.00008 |
| 0.4 | 5 | 0.00902 | 7 | 0.00181 | 15 | 0.00091 | 18 | 0.00018 | 19 | 0.00009 |
| 0.3 | 7 | 0.01060 | 10 | 0.00213 | 21 | 0.00107 | 26 | 0.00021 | 28 | 0.00011 |
| 0.2 | 12 | 0.01427 | 15 | 0.00288 | 34 | 0.00144 | 41 | 0.00029 | 44 | 0.00014 |
| 0.1 | 24 | 0.02592 | 33 | 0.00529 | 72 | 0.00265 | 87 | 0.00053 | 94 | 0.00027 |
| 0.05 | 49 | 0.04892 | 67 | 0.01018 | 147 | 0.00511 | 179 | 0.00103 | 193 | 0.00051 |
| 0.01 | 201 | 0.20084 | 325 | 0.04785 | 717 | 0.02451 | 907 | 0.00500 | 979 | 0.00251 |
| 0.001 | 576 | 0.71440 | 2165 | 0.33345 | 4913 | 0.20008 | 8323 | 0.04764 | 9395 | 0.02440 |
| 0.0001 | 391 | 0.96154 | 4261 | 0.83334 | 10576 | 0.71430 | 44018 | 0.33334 | 64490 | 0.20001 |
| From MAF* | 269 | 1346 | 2692 | 13460 | 26920 | |||||
(*: mean allele age when minor allele frequency (MAF) is 0.4 [53]).
Figure 1Comparisons between theoretical (line) and simulated (dot) r2.
(A) Ne constant: for constant Ne = 100 and 1000, the r2 values at equilibrium decayed from the complete LD are plotted. The 1, 2, and 3 generations indicate r2 values with the decay generation(s) from the complete LD when Ne equaled 1000. (B) Ne changes: After reaching equilibrium with a constant Ne of 1000, three different circumstances of population size were applied for five generations, i.e., increments (1000,1100,1200,1300,1400), decrements (1000 ,500,300,200,100), and bottlenecks (1000,100,100,1000,1000).
Figure 2Three basic changes in population size and the differences in r2 and Ne estimates.
(A) Continuous, terraced, and exponential increment; (B) Continuous, terraced, and exponential decrement; (C) Variable bottlenecks based on time, duration, and amount of reduction.
Figure 3Past population changes and Ne estimates for various situations.
(A) Various increments of population size; (B) Ne estimates based on (A); (C) A decrement and various bottlenecks in population size; (D) Ne estimates based on (C).
Figure 4LD decay of the human genome depending on recombination rates.
(Dashed lines represent the expected r2 at equilibrium assuming constant Ne with the Ne estimate of the current generation).
Figure 5Ne estimates of human population samples depending on recombination rates.