Literature DB >> 23055408

R2* estimation using "in-phase" echoes in the presence of fat: the effects of complex spectrum of fat.

Diego Hernando1, Jens-Peter Kühn, Birger Mensel, Henry Völzke, Ralf Puls, Norbert Hosten, Scott B Reeder.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To investigate R2* mapping robustness in the presence of fat using in-phase echoes, without and with spectral modeling of fat (single-peak and multipeak models, respectively), using varying numbers of echoes.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Data from 88 volunteers (men/women: 52/36, ages: 55.4 ± 12.2) were randomly chosen according to magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) liver fat-fraction (%), and classified into six fat-fraction groups (1: 20 cases, 0%-<10%; 2: 20 cases, 10%-<20%; 3: 20 cases, 20%-<30%; 4: 20 cases, 30%-<40%; 5: 8 cases >40% liver fat; 6: subcutaneous fat from all cases). R2* maps obtained from five in-phase echoes (echo times: 4.8-23.8 msec) were retrospectively reconstructed using single-peak and multipeak fat modeling. R2* maps were also calculated using different numbers (2-5) of echoes.
RESULTS: Multipeak fat corrected R2* mapping is feasible from in-phase echoes, with noise performance comparable to single-peak R2* when using ≥ 4 echoes. Single-peak R2* showed poor robustness to varying echo time combinations in the presence of fat, where using few echoes resulted in large errors. These errors can be reduced using more echoes, or fully corrected using multipeak fat modeling. The mean R2* increased significantly with increasing fat-fraction when using single-peak R2* for any TE combination (P < 0.001), but did not vary when using multipeak R2* for any TE combination (P ≥ 0.158).
CONCLUSION: R2* mapping uncorrected for spectral complexity of fat contains protocol and fat-dependent errors (lack of robustness) in tissues with high fat content. Accounting for complex fat spectrum improves robustness and accuracy of signal fitting, with modest noise performance loss.
Copyright © 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23055408      PMCID: PMC3578028          DOI: 10.1002/jmri.23851

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging        ISSN: 1053-1807            Impact factor:   4.813


  40 in total

1.  Measurement of R'2 in the presence of multiple spectral components using reference spectrum deconvolution.

Authors:  F W Wehrli; J Ma; J A Hopkins; H K Song
Journal:  J Magn Reson       Date:  1998-03       Impact factor: 2.229

2.  A new syndrome of liver iron overload with normal transferrin saturation.

Authors:  R Moirand; A M Mortaji; O Loréal; F Paillard; P Brissot; Y Deugnier
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1997-01-11       Impact factor: 79.321

3.  Functional brain mapping by blood oxygenation level-dependent contrast magnetic resonance imaging. A comparison of signal characteristics with a biophysical model.

Authors:  S Ogawa; R S Menon; D W Tank; S G Kim; H Merkle; J M Ellermann; K Ugurbil
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  1993-03       Impact factor: 4.033

4.  Quantification of liver fat using magnetic resonance spectroscopy.

Authors:  C Thomsen; U Becker; K Winkler; P Christoffersen; M Jensen; O Henriksen
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 2.546

5.  Assessment of relative brain iron concentrations using T2-weighted and T2*-weighted MRI at 3 Tesla.

Authors:  R J Ordidge; J M Gorell; J C Deniau; R A Knight; J A Helpern
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  1994-09       Impact factor: 4.668

6.  MR imaging of the liver using short TI inversion recovery sequences.

Authors:  G M Bydder; R E Steiner; L H Blumgart; S Khenia; I R Young
Journal:  J Comput Assist Tomogr       Date:  1985 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 1.826

7.  1H NMR chemical shift selective (CHESS) imaging.

Authors:  A Haase; J Frahm; W Hänicke; D Matthaei
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  1985-04       Impact factor: 3.609

8.  Increased hepatic iron concentration in nonalcoholic steatohepatitis is associated with increased fibrosis.

Authors:  D K George; S Goldwurm; G A MacDonald; L L Cowley; N I Walker; P J Ward; E C Jazwinska; L W Powell
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  1998-02       Impact factor: 22.682

9.  Osteoporosis: clinical assessment with quantitative MR imaging in diagnosis.

Authors:  F W Wehrli; J C Ford; J G Haddad
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1995-09       Impact factor: 11.105

10.  Ethanol-induced fatty liver in the rat examined by in vivo 1H chemical shift selective magnetic resonance imaging and localized spectroscopic methods.

Authors:  M Ling; M Brauer
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 2.546

View more
  19 in total

1.  On the confounding effect of temperature on chemical shift-encoded fat quantification.

Authors:  Diego Hernando; Samir D Sharma; Harald Kramer; Scott B Reeder
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2013-10-07       Impact factor: 4.668

2.  Evaluation of six-point modified dixon and magnetic resonance spectroscopy for fat quantification: a fat-water-iron phantom study.

Authors:  Kei Fukuzawa; Tatsuya Hayashi; Junji Takahashi; Chiharu Yoshihara; Masakatsu Tano; Jun'ichi Kotoku; Satoshi Saitoh
Journal:  Radiol Phys Technol       Date:  2017-08-02

3.  Preparation and In Vitro Characterization of Magnetized miR-modified Endothelial Cells.

Authors:  Natalia Voronina; Heiko Lemcke; Frank Wiekhorst; Jens-Peter Kühn; Markus Frank; Gustav Steinhoff; Robert David
Journal:  J Vis Exp       Date:  2017-05-02       Impact factor: 1.355

4.  Reliability of measuring the fat content of the lumbar vertebral marrow and paraspinal muscles using MRI mDIXON-Quant sequence.

Authors:  Yong Zhang; Zhuang Zhou; Chao Wang; Xiaoguang Cheng; Ling Wang; Yangyang Duanmu; Chenxin Zhang; Nicola Veronese; Giuseppe Guglielmi
Journal:  Diagn Interv Radiol       Date:  2018-09       Impact factor: 2.630

5.  Prevalence of Fatty Liver Disease and Hepatic Iron Overload in a Northeastern German Population by Using Quantitative MR Imaging.

Authors:  Jens-Peter Kühn; Peter Meffert; Christian Heske; Marie-Luise Kromrey; Carsten O Schmidt; Birger Mensel; Henry Völzke; Markus M Lerch; Diego Hernando; Julia Mayerle; Scott B Reeder
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2017-05-05       Impact factor: 11.105

Review 6.  MR imaging assessment and quantification of liver iron.

Authors:  Manuela França; João Gomes Carvalho
Journal:  Abdom Radiol (NY)       Date:  2020-11

Review 7.  Quantification of liver iron with MRI: state of the art and remaining challenges.

Authors:  Diego Hernando; Yakir S Levin; Claude B Sirlin; Scott B Reeder
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2014-03-03       Impact factor: 4.813

8.  Does fat suppression via chemically selective saturation affect R2*-MRI for transfusional iron overload assessment? A clinical evaluation at 1.5T and 3T.

Authors:  Axel J Krafft; Ralf B Loeffler; Ruitian Song; Xiao Bian; M Beth McCarville; Jane S Hankins; Claudia M Hillenbrand
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2015-08-26       Impact factor: 4.668

9.  Proton-density fat fraction and simultaneous R2* estimation as an MRI tool for assessment of osteoporosis.

Authors:  Jens-Peter Kühn; Diego Hernando; Peter J Meffert; Scott Reeder; Norbert Hosten; Rene Laqua; Antje Steveling; Stephan Ender; Henry Schröder; Dirk-Thomas Pillich
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2013-06-29       Impact factor: 5.315

10.  Estimation of pancreatic R2* for iron overload assessment in the presence of fat: a comparison of different approaches.

Authors:  Maria Filomena Santarelli; Antonella Meloni; Daniele De Marchi; Laura Pistoia; Antonella Quarta; Anna Spasiano; Luigi Landini; Alessia Pepe; Vincenzo Positano
Journal:  MAGMA       Date:  2018-07-24       Impact factor: 2.310

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.