BACKGROUND: Intestinal-type sinonasal adenocarcinoma (ITAC) is a rare tumour that is etiologically related to professional exposure to wood dust and exhibits a poor prognosis. Treatment alternatives to surgery and radiotherapy are needed and may be found in anti-EGFR agents. EGFR gene copy number gains and KRAS/BRAF mutations have been reported to act as positive and negative predictors, respectively, of therapeutic response to EGFR targeted therapies in colorectal adenocarcinoma, a tumour type claimed to be genetically similar to ITAC. Therefore, the aim of this study was to evaluate the occurrence and consequence of EGFR alterations and KRAS and BRAF mutations in a large series of ITAC. METHODS: EGFR protein expression was studied in 98 paraffin embedded tissue samples, organized in a tissue microarray. Gene copy number analysis was performed by FISH using the same tissue microarray, complemented by microarray CGH and MLPA analysis on DNA extracted from 65 fresh frozen tissues. Mutations in EGFR, KRAS and BRAF were analysed by direct sequencing on 65 fresh frozen tissues. RESULTS: EGFR gene copy number gains were observed in 45 %, and protein over-expression in 21 % of the cases. No mutations were found in EGFR or BRAF, while KRAS mutations were present in 12 % of the cases. Neither protein overexpression nor gene copy number gain correlated to histological subtype, tumour stage or clinical follow-up. CONCLUSION: In the largest series of ITAC published to date, and using a number of different techniques, EGFR alterations were frequently observed. Although apparently not useful as a prognostic factor, there may be a basis for investigating EGFR targeted therapies in this group of patients, especially because negative response predictors such as KRAS and BRAF mutations are infrequent or absent, respectively.
BACKGROUND:Intestinal-type sinonasal adenocarcinoma (ITAC) is a rare tumour that is etiologically related to professional exposure to wood dust and exhibits a poor prognosis. Treatment alternatives to surgery and radiotherapy are needed and may be found in anti-EGFR agents. EGFR gene copy number gains and KRAS/BRAF mutations have been reported to act as positive and negative predictors, respectively, of therapeutic response to EGFR targeted therapies in colorectal adenocarcinoma, a tumour type claimed to be genetically similar to ITAC. Therefore, the aim of this study was to evaluate the occurrence and consequence of EGFR alterations and KRAS and BRAF mutations in a large series of ITAC. METHODS:EGFR protein expression was studied in 98 paraffin embedded tissue samples, organized in a tissue microarray. Gene copy number analysis was performed by FISH using the same tissue microarray, complemented by microarray CGH and MLPA analysis on DNA extracted from 65 fresh frozen tissues. Mutations in EGFR, KRAS and BRAF were analysed by direct sequencing on 65 fresh frozen tissues. RESULTS:EGFR gene copy number gains were observed in 45 %, and protein over-expression in 21 % of the cases. No mutations were found in EGFR or BRAF, while KRAS mutations were present in 12 % of the cases. Neither protein overexpression nor gene copy number gain correlated to histological subtype, tumour stage or clinical follow-up. CONCLUSION: In the largest series of ITAC published to date, and using a number of different techniques, EGFR alterations were frequently observed. Although apparently not useful as a prognostic factor, there may be a basis for investigating EGFR targeted therapies in this group of patients, especially because negative response predictors such as KRAS and BRAF mutations are infrequent or absent, respectively.
Authors: Jhudit Pérez-Escuredo; Jorge García Martínez; Cristina García-Inclán; Blanca Vivanco; María Costales; César Álvarez Marcos; José Luis Llorente; Mario A Hermsen Journal: Cell Oncol (Dordr) Date: 2011-01-18 Impact factor: 6.730
Authors: Sue S Yom; Asif Rashid; David I Rosenthal; Danielle D Elliott; Ehab Y Hanna; Randal S Weber; Adel K El-Naggar Journal: Mod Pathol Date: 2005-03 Impact factor: 7.842
Authors: Gennaro Galizia; Eva Lieto; Francesca Ferraraccio; Ferdinando De Vita; Paolo Castellano; Michele Orditura; Vincenzo Imperatore; Anna La Mura; Giovanni La Manna; Margherita Pinto; Giuseppe Catalano; Carlo Pignatelli; Fortunato Ciardiello Journal: Ann Surg Oncol Date: 2006-04-18 Impact factor: 5.344
Authors: Ingrid Ljuslinder; Beatrice Melin; Maria L Henriksson; Åke Öberg; Richard Palmqvist Journal: Int J Cancer Date: 2011-05-01 Impact factor: 7.396
Authors: Marta Alonso Guervós; César Alvarez Marcos; José Luis Llorente; Andrés Sampedro Nuño; Carlos Suárez; Mario Hermsen Journal: Oral Oncol Date: 2008-10-25 Impact factor: 5.337
Authors: Manuela Ariza; José Luis Llorente; Cesar Alvarez-Marcas; Lucia Baragaño; Ana Salas; Nuria Rodriguez Prado; Mario Hermsen; Carlos Suárez; Andres Sampedro Journal: Cancer Date: 2004-01-15 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: Blanca Vivanco; José Luis Llorente; Jhudit Perez-Escuredo; César Alvarez Marcos; Manuel Florentino Fresno; Mario A Hermsen Journal: Patholog Res Int Date: 2011-04-20
Authors: Aaron M Udager; Delphine C M Rolland; Jonathan B McHugh; Bryan L Betz; Carlos Murga-Zamalloa; Thomas E Carey; Lawrence J Marentette; Mario A Hermsen; Kathleen E DuRoss; Megan S Lim; Kojo S J Elenitoba-Johnson; Noah A Brown Journal: Cancer Res Date: 2015-04-30 Impact factor: 12.701
Authors: Santiago Cabezas-Camarero; Virginia de la Orden García; Vanesa García-Barberán; Beatriz Mediero-Valeros; Ahmad Issa Subhi-Issa; Patricia Llovet García; Inmaculada Bando-Polaino; Salomé Merino Menéndez; Pedro Pérez-Segura; Eduardo Díaz-Rubio Journal: Oncologist Date: 2019-01-02