Literature DB >> 23055034

Perfusion index and plethysmographic variability index in patients with interscalene nerve catheters.

Anne Sebastiani1, Larissa Philippi, Stefan Boehme, Dorothea Closhen, Irene Schmidtmann, Anton Scherhag, Klaus Markstaller, Kristin Engelhard, Gunther Pestel.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Interscalene nerve blocks provide adequate analgesia, but there are no objective criteria for early assessment of correct catheter placement. In the present study, pulse oximetry technology was used to evaluate changes in the perfusion index (PI) in both blocked and unblocked arms, and changes in the plethysmographic variability index (PVI) were evaluated once mechanical ventilation was instituted.
METHODS: The PI and PVI values were assessed using a Radical-7™ finger pulse oximetry device (Masimo Corp., Irvine, CA, USA) in both arms of 30 orthopedic patients who received an interscalene catheter at least 25 min before induction of general anesthesia. Data were evaluated at baseline, on application of local anesthetics; five, ten, and 15 min after onset of interscalene nerve blocks; after induction of general anesthesia; before and after a 500 mL colloid fluid challenge; and five minutes thereafter.
RESULTS: In the 25 patients with successful blocks, the difference between the PI values in the blocked arm and the PI values in the contralateral arm increased within five minutes of the application of the local anesthetics (P < 0.05) and increased progressively until 15 min. After induction of general anesthesia, the PI increased in the unblocked arm while it remained relatively constant in the blocked arm, thus reducing the difference in the PI. A fluid challenge resulted in a decrease in PVI values in both arms.
CONCLUSION: The perfusion index increases after successful interscalene nerve blockade and may be used as an indicator for successful block placement in awake patients. The PVI values before and after a fluid challenge can be useful to detect changes in preload, and this can be performed in both blocked and unblocked arms.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23055034     DOI: 10.1007/s12630-012-9796-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Can J Anaesth        ISSN: 0832-610X            Impact factor:   5.063


  7 in total

1.  Evaluation of perfusion index as a tool for pain assessment in critically ill patients.

Authors:  Ahmed Hasanin; Sabah Abdel Raouf Mohamed; Akram El-Adawy
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2016-09-24       Impact factor: 2.502

2.  Usefulness of perfusion index to detect the effect of brachial plexus block.

Authors:  Alparslan Kus; Yavuz Gurkan; Suna Kara Gormus; Mine Solak; Kamil Toker
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2013-02-10       Impact factor: 2.502

3.  The accuracy of non-invasively continuous total hemoglobin measurement by pulse CO-Oximetry undergoing acute normovolemic hemodilution and reinfusion of autologous blood.

Authors:  Junichi Saito; Masato Kitayama; Masafumi Oishi; Tomoyuki Kudo; Masahiro Sawada; Hiroshi Hashimoto; Kazuyoshi Hirota
Journal:  J Anesth       Date:  2014-06-28       Impact factor: 2.078

4.  The perfusion index could early predict a nerve block success: A preliminary report.

Authors:  Romualdo Del Buono; Giuseppe Pascarella; Fabio Costa; Felice Eugenio Agrò
Journal:  Saudi J Anaesth       Date:  2020-09-24

5.  A study to evaluate the change in perfusion index as an indicator of successful ultrasound-guided supraclavicular block.

Authors:  Jatin Lal; Mamta Bhardwaj; Aanchal Malik; Teena Bansal
Journal:  Indian J Anaesth       Date:  2021-10-29

6.  Regional haemodynamic variables and perfusion index in the evaluation of sciatic nerve block: a prospective observational trial.

Authors:  Bo Lu; Jingyan Jiang; Xiaoyu Li; Qingge Chen; Jinling Qin; Yun Chen; Junping Chen; Qing Shen
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2022-05-02       Impact factor: 2.692

7.  Evaluation of prediction effect of perfusion index for supraclavicular brachial plexus block in children: protocol for a randomized trial.

Authors:  Jinxu Wang; Lingli Deng; Aijun Xu
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2022-08-04       Impact factor: 2.728

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.