Literature DB >> 23054251

A population pharmacokinetic model for the complex systemic absorption of ropivacaine after femoral nerve block in patients undergoing knee surgery.

François Gaudreault1, Pierre Drolet, Michel Fallaha, France Varin.   

Abstract

Because of its slow systemic absorption and flip-flop kinetics, ropivacaine's pharmacokinetics after a peripheral nerve block has never been thoroughly characterized. The purpose of this study was to develop a population pharmacokinetic model for ropivacaine after loco-regional administration and to identify patient characteristics that may influence the drug's absorption and disposition. Frequent plasma samples were taken up to 93 h after a 100 mg dose given as femoral block for postoperative analgesia in 15 orthopedic patients. Ropivacaine plasma concentration-time data were analyzed using a nonlinear mixed effects modeling method. A one-compartment model with parallel inverse Gaussian and time-dependent inputs best described ropivacaine plasma concentration-time curves. Ropivacaine systemic absorption was characterized by a rapid phase (mean absorption time of 25 ± 4.8 min) followed by a much slower phase (half-life of 3.9 ± 0.65 h). Interindividual variability (IIV) for these parameters, 58 and 9 %, indicated that the initial absorption phase was more variable. The apparent volume of distribution (V/F = 77.2 ± 11.5 L, IIV = 26 %) was influenced by body weight (Δ 1.49 % per kg change) whereas the absorption rate constant (slower phase) of ropivacaine was affected by age (Δ 2.25 % per year change). No covariate effects were identified for the apparent clearance of the drug (CL/F =10.8 ± 1.0 L/h, 34  IIV = 34 %). These findings support our hypothesis that modeling a complex systemic absorption directly from plasma concentration-time curves exhibiting flip-flop kinetics is possible. Only the age-effect was considered as relevant for possible dosing adjustments.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23054251     DOI: 10.1007/s10928-012-9275-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn        ISSN: 1567-567X            Impact factor:   2.745


  26 in total

1.  Pharmacology of local anaesthetic agents. Pharmacokinetics of local anaesthetic agents.

Authors:  G T Tucker; L E Mather
Journal:  Br J Anaesth       Date:  1975-02       Impact factor: 9.166

2.  The pharmacokinetics of ropivacaine in elderly patients undergoing nerve stimulator-guided thoracic paravertebral block.

Authors:  Jun Zhang; Wei Zhou; Zheng Jiao; Weiwei Qin; Jianghui Xu; Weimin Liang; Xiaojin Shi
Journal:  J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth       Date:  2010-10-16       Impact factor: 2.628

3.  The use of a sum of inverse Gaussian functions to describe the absorption profile of drugs exhibiting complex absorption.

Authors:  Chantal Csajka; David Drover; Davide Verotta
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  2005-08-03       Impact factor: 4.200

4.  The pharmacokinetics of ropivacaine after four different techniques of brachial plexus blockade.

Authors:  H C Rettig; J G C Lerou; M J M Gielen; E Boersma; A G L Burm
Journal:  Anaesthesia       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 6.955

5.  Arterial and venous plasma levels of bupivacaine following peripheral nerve blocks.

Authors:  D C Moore; L E Mather; L D Bridenbaugh; R I Balfour; D F Lysons; W G Horton
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  1976 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 5.108

6.  Arterial and venous pharmacokinetics of ropivacaine with and without epinephrine after thoracic paravertebral block.

Authors:  Manoj K Karmakar; Anthony M-H Ho; Bonita K Law; April S Y Wong; Steven L Shafer; Tony Gin
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 7.892

7.  Combined lumbar-plexus and sciatic-nerve blocks: an analysis of plasma ropivacaine concentrations.

Authors:  Stephanie Vanterpool; Susan M Steele; Karen C Nielsen; Marcy Tucker; Stephen M Klein
Journal:  Reg Anesth Pain Med       Date:  2006 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 6.288

8.  Femoral nerve block with ropivacaine or bupivacaine in day case anterior crucial ligament reconstruction.

Authors:  H Wulf; J Löwe; K-H Gnutzmann; T Steinfeldt
Journal:  Acta Anaesthesiol Scand       Date:  2010-01-18       Impact factor: 2.105

Review 9.  Clinical pharmacokinetics of epidural and spinal anaesthesia.

Authors:  A G Burm
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  1989-05       Impact factor: 6.447

10.  A comparison of the pharmacodynamics and pharmacokinetics of bupivacaine, ropivacaine (with epinephrine) and their equal volume mixtures with lidocaine used for femoral and sciatic nerve blocks: a double-blind randomized study.

Authors:  Philippe Cuvillon; Emmanuel Nouvellon; Jacques Ripart; Jean-Christophe Boyer; Laurence Dehour; Aba Mahamat; Joel L'hermite; Christophe Boisson; Nathalie Vialles; Jean Yves Lefrant; Jean Emmanuel de La Coussaye
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 5.108

View more
  5 in total

1.  Variability and singularity arising from poor compliance in a pharmacokinetic model II: the multi-oral case.

Authors:  Lisandro J Fermín; Jacques Lévy-Véhel
Journal:  J Math Biol       Date:  2016-07-18       Impact factor: 2.259

2.  Population pharmacokinetic model for tumescent lidocaine in women undergoing breast cancer surgery.

Authors:  Camille Riff; Aurélie Bourgoin; Amelie Marsot; Laurent Allanioux; Marc Leone; Olivier Blin; Romain Guilhaumou
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2018-06-16       Impact factor: 2.953

3.  Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic modelling after subcutaneous, intravenous and buccal administration of a high-concentration formulation of buprenorphine in conscious cats.

Authors:  Graeme M Doodnaught; Beatriz P Monteiro; Javier Benito; Daniel Edge; Francis Beaudry; Ludovic Pelligand; Paulo Steagall
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-04-26       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Pharmacokinetics of Lidocaine Hydrochloride Administered with or without Adrenaline for the Paravertebral Brachial Plexus Block in Dogs.

Authors:  Amélie Choquette; Eric Troncy; Martin Guillot; France Varin; Jérôme R E Del Castillo
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-01-09       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Effects of local anesthetics on breast cancer cell viability and migration.

Authors:  Ru Li; Chunyun Xiao; Hengrui Liu; Yujie Huang; James P Dilger; Jun Lin
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2018-06-19       Impact factor: 4.430

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.