Literature DB >> 23053752

Aneurysmal bone cysts of the spine.

Mehmet Zileli1, Hasan Serdar Isik, Fatih Ersay Ogut, Merih Is, Sedat Cagli, Cem Calli.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Aneurysmal bone cyst is a benign, relatively uncommon lesion, representing 1.4 % of primary bone tumors. The vertebral column is involved in 3-30 % of cases. This report describes clinical characteristics and treatment results of 18 patients with aneurysmal bone cyst of the spine.
METHODS: Between 1991 and 2008, 18 patients with aneurysmal bone cyst of the spine were surgically treated in our department. The clinical records, radiographs, histologic sections, and operative reports were analyzed.
RESULTS: There were 11 male and 7 female patients; mean age was 22.1 years (range 7-46 years). Localizations were cervical (3), cervicothoracic (2), thoracic (3), lumbar (4), and sacrum (6). Tumor was localized on the left side in 11 cases, on the right side in 2 and at midline in 5 patients. The two most common clinical features were axial pain (14 patients) and radicular pain (8 patients). Neurological signs were paraparesis in 3, monoparesis in 6. Mean duration of symptoms was 9 months (range 3 months-3 years). All patients underwent surgery: total removal was performed in 13 patients and subtotal resection in 5. Posterior (11), anterolateral (1), or combined anterior-posterior (6) approaches were used. Mean follow-up duration was 112.3 months (range 4-21 years). We detected four recurrences in subtotal excision group (4/5), and one recurrence in total excision group (1/13).
CONCLUSION: Treatment options for aneurysmal bone cysts are simple curettage with or without bone grafting, complete excision, embolization, radiation therapy, or a combination of these modalities. Radical surgical excision should be the goal of surgery to decrease the recurrence rate. Recurrence rate is significantly lower in case of total excision.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23053752      PMCID: PMC3585636          DOI: 10.1007/s00586-012-2510-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Spine J        ISSN: 0940-6719            Impact factor:   3.134


Introduction

Aneurysmal bone cyst (ABC) is a benign, tumor-like, highly vascular, locally aggresive, and relatively rare osteolytic lesion of unknown etiology [1]. The lesions primarily occur in the first two decades of life, with slight women predominance [2, 3]. After osteoid osteoma and osteoblastoma, ABC is the third most frequent benign bone tumor. Primary ABCs represent 1.4 % of primary bone tumors and the vertebral column, especially lumbar area and posterior elements are involved in 3–30 % of cases [4, 5]. Pain is the most common complaint, occurs especially at night, and it is localized to the site of the lesion. Direct radiographs, computed tomography (CT), and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) help in diagnosis. Direct radiographs show an expansile osteolytic cavity. Fluid–fluid levels may be seen on both CT and MRI [6]. Management of ABCs of the spine is controversial. Options of treatments of ABCs in spine are surgical resection, radiation therapy, cryotherapy, and embolization [5, 7]. The purpose of this study is to describe the incidence, clinical presentation, diagnostic and therapeutic options, recurrence rate of the patients with ABC of the spine in our institute.

Methods

Eigtheen patients with ABCs in the spine were surgically treated in our department between 1995 and 2010. The clinical records, radiographs, histologic sections, and operative reports were analyzed. The mean follow-up duration was 112.3 months (ranged from 4 to 15 years).

Results

There were 11 male and 7 female patients; mean age was 22.1 years (range 7–46 years). Localizations were cervical (3), cervicothoracic (2), thoracic (3), lumbar (4), and sacrum (6). Tumor was localized on the left side in 11 cases, on the right side in 2, and at midline in 5. The two most common clinical features were axial pain (14 patients) and radicular pain (8 patients). Nine patients had no neurological symptoms, while six patients had motor weakness due to root compression, and three patients had motor weakness due to cord compression. Mean duration of symptoms was 9 months (3 months–3 years). Preoperative findings of patients were summarized in Table 1.
Table 1

Pre-operative findings of patients

No.Age, sexLocalizationSideWBB stageSymptom duration (m)Symptoms and findings
117, FC2Left3–7 ABCD3Neck pain, no neurology
215, FC6Left1–7 ABCD6Neck pain, left arm paresis
346, FC6–C7Left1–8, 12 ABCD4Neck pain, left arm weakness
47, MC7–T2Left1–12 ABCD3Back pain, paraplegia
58, MT1–T2Right1, 2, 5–12 ABCD9Neck pain, radicular pain, no neurology
610, MT7–T8Midline1–3, 10–12 ABCD1Paraplegia
740, MT11Left8–11 ABCD1Back pain, no neurology
818, MT12–L1Left1–3, 12 ABCD4Paraparesis
930, ML2Midline4–10 ABCD24Low back and leg pain, no neurology
1018, ML3Left3–7 ABCD3Low back and left leg pain, monoparesis
1117, ML4Left1–4, 12 ABCD5Left leg pain, no neurology
1217, FL5Midline1, 2, 11, 12 ABC36Low back pain, no neurology
1315, ML5-sacrumRight1–12 ABCD3Low back and left leg pain, paraparesis
1413, FL5-sacrumLeft2–6 ABCD12Low back and left leg pain, no neurology
1522, FL5-sacrumMidline2–11, ABCD12Low back pain, paraparesis
1629, MSacrumLeft2–8 ABCD24Low back pain, no neurology
1732, FSacrumLeft1–8, 11, 12 ABCD12Left leg pain, left monoparesis
1843, MSacrumMidline1–12 ABCD1Low back and leg pain, no neurology

M Male, F Female

Pre-operative findings of patients M Male, F Female Direct radiology disclosed bone erosion in 15 cases. MRI was carried out in 17 patients; one patient underwent CT myelography for diagnosis. Among 17 patients diagnosed with MRI, bone edema was present in six cases. Vascularization was moderate in nine patients, prominent in six, and there were no signs of vascularization in two cases. Upon radiological examination with CT scan or MRI, canal compression was verified in 13 patients: 5 were mild, three were moderate, and 6 were severe. There was no canal compression in four patients. Paravertebral soft tissue mass was determined in 15 cases. There were fluid–fluid levels in 10 cases (Table 2). According to Weinstein, Boriani, Biagini [8, 9] (WBB, Fig. 1) surgical staging, 17 cases were stage ABCD and one patient was stage ABC.
Table 2

Radiological findings of patients

No.Source of radiologyLocalizationPlain radiogra.Canal compressionFluid–fluid levelsBone edema in MRIPara vertebral massVascularization in MRI
1X-ray, CT, MRIC2Normal+YesNoYes++
2X-ray, CT, MRIC6ErosionYesYesYes+++
3X-ray, CT, MRIC6–C7Erosion+YesYesYes++
4X-ray, MRIC7–T2Erosion+++NoNoYes+++
5X-ray, CT, MRIT1–T2ErosionYesNoYes++
6X-ray, MRIT7–T8Erosion, fracture+++NoYesYes+++
7X-ray, CT, MRIT11NormalNoYesNo
8X-ray, CT myelographyT12–L1Erosion+++NoNAYesNA
9X-ray, CT, MRIL2Erosion++YesNoNo++
10X-ray, CT, MRIL3Erosion++YesYesYes++
11X-ray, CT, MRIL4Erosion++YesNoYes++
12X-Ray, CT, MRIL5NormalNoNoNo
13X-ray, CT, MRIL5-sacrumErosion+++YesNoYes+++
14X-ray, CT, MRIL5-sacrumErosion+++YesNoYes++
15X-ray, CT, MRIL5-sacrumErosion+++YesNoYes++
16X-ray, CT, MRI, DSASacrumErosion+NoNoYes+++
17X-ray, CT, MRI, DSASacrumErosion+NoYesYes+++
18X-ray, CT, MRISacrumErosion+NoNoYes++

+ Mild, ++ Moderate, +++ Severe, NA non available, DSA digital subtraction angiography

Fig. 1

WBB (Weinstein, Boriani, Biagnini) Surgical Staging System. The transverse extension of the vertebral tumor is described with reference to 12 radiating zones (numbered 1–12 in a clockwise order) and to five concentric layers (A–E, from the paravertebral extraosseous compartments to the dural involvement). The longitudinal extent of the tumor is recorded according to the levels involved. From Boriani [9]

Radiological findings of patients + Mild, ++ Moderate, +++ Severe, NA non available, DSA digital subtraction angiography WBB (Weinstein, Boriani, Biagnini) Surgical Staging System. The transverse extension of the vertebral tumor is described with reference to 12 radiating zones (numbered 1–12 in a clockwise order) and to five concentric layers (A–E, from the paravertebral extraosseous compartments to the dural involvement). The longitudinal extent of the tumor is recorded according to the levels involved. From Boriani [9] All patients underwent surgery. Total removal could be performed in 13 patients. It was a spondylectomy in one patient. Subtotal resection was performed in five patients. Surgical approaches were posterior alone (11), posterior and lateral (1), and combined anterior-posterior (6) (Figs. 2, 3). Combined approaches were done in one session in five cases, and separate sessions in one case. One patient had a repeat surgery due to recurrence. Six patients were instrumented in addition to tumor removal. Tumor bed was supported with polymethyl methacryate (PMMA) in three patients and with autografts and cage in four patients. On last follow-up, 13 patients have no evidence of disease and five cases are alive with disease (Table 3). As complication, one patient had cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) collection at the site of incision and two patients had significant bleeding during surgery which needed blood transfusion.
Fig. 2

a–l Case # 7. A 30-year-old male was admitted to our department with low-back and leg pain for 2 years. There were no neurological deficits. MR and CT images revealed an L3 aneurysmal bone cyst with moderate canal compromise. There were fluid–fluid levels, but no soft tissue mass. WBB scale was 4–10 ABCD. A combined surgical approach (first anterior, then posterior) with gross total removal was performed. A vertebral body cage and posterior pedicle fixation system were used to reconstruct and stabilize the spine. There was no recurrence during the 26-month follow-up time

Fig. 3

a–m Case # 2 A 46-year-old female came with neck pain, left arm weakness for 4 months. Neurological examination showed a monoparesis of left upper extremity. MR and CT scans showed a tumor on the left side of C6 and C7 vertebral bodies. C6, C7 body, C7 lamina, pedicle, facet joint, left C6–C7 neural foramina. WBB scale was 1–8, 12 ABCD. A total spondylectomy was performed using a combined posterior, anterior and posterior approach. Spinal reconstruction was achieved using a fibula allograft, anterior cervical plate and posterior lateral mass screw-rod system. There was no recurrence during the 16-month follow-up period

Table 3

Treatment of patients

No.LocalizationSurgery and approachNo. of surgeriesTumor removalImplant, graftComplicationFollow-up (months)Last status
1C2Post and lat1TotalPost fixation, Ant cage and autograftNone66NED
2C6–C7Comb. post-ant1TotalAnterior plate and autograft, posterior screw and rodNone118NED
3C6Comb. ant-post1SubtotalPosterior plate CSF collection90AWD
4C7–T2Post then ant2TotalAnterior plateNone158NED
5T1–T2Comb. post-ant1TotalPosterior and anterior plateNone79NED
6T7–T8Post1TotalNoneNone202NED
7T11Post1TotalNoneNone55NED
8T12–L1Post1SubtotalNoneNone257AWD
9L2Comb. ant-post1TotalCage, pedicle fixationNone99NED
10L3Post1TotalNoneNone136NED
11L4Post1TotalNoneNone77NED
12L5Post1TotalNoneNone155NED
13L5-sacrumPost1SubtotalPMMANone115NED
14L5-SacrumPost1TotalPMMANone57NED
15L5-SacrumPost1SubtotalPMMAOver bleeding45AWD
16SacrumPost1SubtotalNoneNone147AWD
17SacrumComb. post-ant1TotalNoneOver bleeding83AWD
18SacrumPost1TotalNoneNone86NED

CSF cerebrospinal fluid, NED no evidence of disease, AWD alive with disease, PMMA Polymethyl methacryate

a–l Case # 7. A 30-year-old male was admitted to our department with low-back and leg pain for 2 years. There were no neurological deficits. MR and CT images revealed an L3 aneurysmal bone cyst with moderate canal compromise. There were fluid–fluid levels, but no soft tissue mass. WBB scale was 4–10 ABCD. A combined surgical approach (first anterior, then posterior) with gross total removal was performed. A vertebral body cage and posterior pedicle fixation system were used to reconstruct and stabilize the spine. There was no recurrence during the 26-month follow-up time a–m Case # 2 A 46-year-old female came with neck pain, left arm weakness for 4 months. Neurological examination showed a monoparesis of left upper extremity. MR and CT scans showed a tumor on the left side of C6 and C7 vertebral bodies. C6, C7 body, C7 lamina, pedicle, facet joint, left C6–C7 neural foramina. WBB scale was 1–8, 12 ABCD. A total spondylectomy was performed using a combined posterior, anterior and posterior approach. Spinal reconstruction was achieved using a fibula allograft, anterior cervical plate and posterior lateral mass screw-rod system. There was no recurrence during the 16-month follow-up period Treatment of patients CSF cerebrospinal fluid, NED no evidence of disease, AWD alive with disease, PMMA Polymethyl methacryate

Discussion

The prevalence of ABCs is 1.4 cases per 100,000 individuals, and they constitute approximately 1 % of all bone tumors [2, 7]. The lesions primarily occur in the first two decades of life, with slight women predominance [10]. In this study, mean age was 22.1 years similar with the literature but we have a male predominance (61 %). ABCs are benign, highly vascular, locally aggressive tumors and recurrence rates after curettage were reported equal or less than 50 % [1, 3]. Spontaneous regression of the tumor is uncommon [11]. Malghem [12] has reported spontaneous healing in three patients. ABCs have a predilection for the lumbar spine in the series of Boriani and De Kleuver [7, 13]. In contrast, in Papagelopoulos’ and Vergel de Dios’ series, cervical and thoracic spine were involved more than lumbar spine [3, 5]. In our series, sacrum and lumbar spine were involved more than others. The combination of radiographs, CT scans, and MRI is diagnostic in many cases. Characteristic ballooning of the posterior elements with a thin rim may be shown on plain radiographs [14]. CT imaging reveals multiloculated lytic lesions with multiple internal septations, pathologic fracture or vertebral body collapse. CT scans are also useful for planning of possible instrumentation landmarks during surgery [15]. On MR imaging, ABCs usually demonstrate a thin, well defined rim of low signal intensity in the periphery and they are seen as multiseptate lesions. Usually each lobule represents different signal characteristics giving the tumor a heterogenous appearance. Both CT and MRI are important diagnostic tools for planning the surgical management [7]. We performed both CT and MR for the diagnosis. Fluid–fluid levels can be seen in the ABC, but this finding is not specific for ABCs. This appearance is also seen in the other bone lesions, which contain areas of hemorrhage or necrosis such as telangiectatic osteosarcoma, giant cell tumor, and chondroblastoma [16]. Differential diagnosis of ABCs includes giant cell tumor, chondroblastoma, chondromyxoid fibroma, fibrosarcoma, telangiectatic osteosarcoma, fibrous dysplasia, simple bone cyst, osteoblastoma, and plasmocytoma [4, 17]. Keenan et al. [18] reported that in their series of patients the incidence of fluid–fluid levels was 85 %. However, in our study fluid–fluid levels were present only in 10 of 18 cases (55 %). This may be because we only evaluated spinal ABCs whereas Keenan et al. have included ABCs originating from the whole skeleton. The question whether spinal ABCs show less frequent fluid–fluid levels than the other parts of the skeleton should be answered through further imaging studies. Another point was to determine whether the nature of ABCs (having fluid–fluid levels versus solid) have influenced the results of the surgical treatment. However, there was no significant difference of the recurrence rates of cystic or solid type of aneurysmal bone cysts. Although CT an MR are diagnostic methods for many cases, it is noted that in the literature, biopsy is necessary for confirmation, since many bone lesions can have a similar appearance [19]. However, it must be performed cautiously for sometimes needle biopsies can cause complications because the material obtained may consist of mostly blood elements. To prevent such complications, open biopsy and frozen sections were recommended to establish the diagnosis [20]. In this study, biopsy was performed in six cases and we did not see any complication. Histological examination is definitely necessary to confirm the differential diagnosis. The histology of ABC is typically characterized by cavernous channels surrounded by a spindle cell stroma with osteoclast like giant cells and osteoid production [21]. There are some hypotheses in the literature that the tumor is the result of either hemorrhage into the tumor, or a vascular disturbance of the bone, or improper repair of a traumatic subperiosteal hemorrhages [22]. Treatment of ABC is also controversial. The options for treatment are curettage with or without bone grafting, complete excision, arterial embolization, intralesional drug injections (steroid and calcitonin), and radiation [6, 8]. Early diagnosis and appropriate surgical treatment of ABCs in the spine remain the key factors to successful management [23]. Total excision with or without instrumentation is the optimal approach for local control of tumor and it prevents recurrence [19]. We performed 13 total and 5 subtotal excision with 5 recurrences in this series. PMMA injection (vertebroplasty or kyphoplasty) may be used to reinforce the bony defects after curettage [24]. Three patients in this study were also reinforced by PMMA injections after removal. There are also reports that the injections of calcitonin or methyl prednisolone inside the ABC cavities are safe procedures with no side effects [14]. Radiotherapy was recommended in inoperable cases, but it has numerous and severe complications including osteonecrosis, gonodal damage, myelopathy and induction of osteosarcoma [3, 6]. Also, preoperative embolization may be performed to minimize intraoperative blood loss [19, 25]. In 2010, Rossi et al. [26] reported their experiences and they considered selective arterial embolization is a less invasive, more feasible, effective and repeatable alternative method to standard surgical treatments. However, we did not use that method in any case in this series. Recurrence is reported in 10–44 % of the cases, and usually rare when the tumor is excised completely [3]. Ninty percent of recurrences occur within 2 years. Thus, post-treatment follow-up should be at least 24 months [1, 3, 7]. In this series, 13 of 18 patients had a radical surgical removal. We detected four recurrences in subtotal excision group (4/5), and one recurrence in total excision group (1/13). Hay et al. [4] reported that there were no recurrences when total excision was performed, and a 25 % recurrence rate after partial excision. Total excision of large tumors results in bony instability, and instrumentation is necessary to maintain structural integrity [27]. It is also reported that careful preoperative planning is important for management of post excision spinal instability [19]. In this series, six patients have undergone spinal stabilization to prevent spinal deformity and instability.

Conclusions

Early diagnosis and appropriate surgical treatment of aneurysmal bone cysts in the spine remain the key factors to successful management. Although an effective spinal decompression and stabilization can be achieved by partial or subtotal excisions, recurrence rate is significantly lower in case of total excision. Complete tumor removal would provide a cure for this agressive pathology in long term follow-ups.
  24 in total

Review 1.  Primary vertebral tumors: a review of epidemiologic, histological, and imaging findings, Part I: benign tumors.

Authors:  Alexander E Ropper; Kevin S Cahill; John W Hanna; Edward F McCarthy; Ziya L Gokaslan; John H Chi
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 4.654

2.  Transrectal drainage of a diverticular abscess using a pigtail catheter without radiological guidance: a case report.

Authors:  Bobby Vm Dasari; John Lawson; Jack Lee
Journal:  J Med Case Rep       Date:  2011-01-04

3.  MR imaging of aneurysmal bone cysts.

Authors:  P L Munk; C A Helms; R G Holt; J Johnston; L Steinbach; C Neumann
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1989-07       Impact factor: 3.959

Review 4.  Musculoskeletal lesions with fluid-fluid level: a pictorial essay.

Authors:  Sean Keenan; Liem T Bui-Mansfield
Journal:  J Comput Assist Tomogr       Date:  2006 May-Jun       Impact factor: 1.826

5.  Spontaneous regression of aneurysmal bone cyst. A case report.

Authors:  Y Sağlik; M I Kapicioğlu; B Güzel
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 3.067

6.  Aneurysmal bone cysts of the spine.

Authors:  M C Hay; D Paterson; T K Taylor
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  1978-08

Review 7.  Primary bone tumors of the spine. Terminology and surgical staging.

Authors:  S Boriani; J N Weinstein; R Biagini
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1997-05-01       Impact factor: 3.468

8.  Aneurysmal bone cyst of the spine with familial incidence.

Authors:  M R DiCaprio; M J Murphy; R L Camp
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2000-06-15       Impact factor: 3.468

Review 9.  Aneurysmal bone cyst of spine: a review of literature.

Authors:  B Saccomanni
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2007-10-09       Impact factor: 3.067

Review 10.  Aneurysmal bone cyst of the spine: 31 cases and the importance of the surgical approach.

Authors:  M de Kleuver; R O van der Heul; B E Veraart
Journal:  J Pediatr Orthop B       Date:  1998-10       Impact factor: 1.041

View more
  24 in total

1.  Expert's comment concerning Grand Rounds case entitled "Solid aneurysmal bone cyst on the cervical spine of a young child" (L. Casabianca et al.).

Authors:  Stefano Boriani
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2015-04-15       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Symptomatic aneurysmal bone cysts of the spine: clinical features, surgical outcomes, and prognostic factors.

Authors:  Yuechao Zhao; Shaohui He; Haitao Sun; Xiaopan Cai; Xin Gao; Peng Wang; Haifeng Wei; Wei Xu; Jianru Xiao
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2019-03-05       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  Aneurysmal bone cysts of the spine: treatment options and considerations.

Authors:  Stefano Boriani; Sheng-fu L Lo; Varun Puvanesarajah; Charles G Fisher; Peter P Varga; Laurence D Rhines; Niccole M Germscheid; Alessandro Luzzati; Dean Chou; Jeremy J Reynolds; Richard P Williams; Patti Zadnik; Mari Groves; Daniel M Sciubba; Chetan Bettegowda; Ziya L Gokaslan
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2014-07-25       Impact factor: 4.130

4.  Solid aneurysmal bone cyst on the cervical spine of a young child.

Authors:  L Casabianca; A Journé; G Mirouse; M Zerah; D Moulies; C Glorion; T Odent
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2015-03-18       Impact factor: 3.134

5.  Expert's comment concerning Grand Rounds case entitled "Aneurysmal bone cyst of C2 treated with novel anterior reconstruction and stabilization" by S. Rajasekaran et al. (Eur Spine J; 2016: DOI 10.1007/s00586-016-4518-0).

Authors:  Stefano Boriani
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2018-04-23       Impact factor: 3.134

6.  [Atlas fracture due to aneurysmal bone cyst after minor trauma].

Authors:  T Topp; A Krüger; R Zettl; J Figiel; S Ruchholtz; T M Frangen
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2014-05       Impact factor: 1.000

7.  Aneurysmal bone cyst presenting as a pathologic fracture in a 12-year-old football player.

Authors:  Aaron B Welk; Kettner Norman W
Journal:  J Chiropr Med       Date:  2014-03

Review 8.  Epithelioid Hemangioma of the Thoracic Spine: A Case Report and Review of the Literature.

Authors:  Eijiro Okada; Morio Matsumoto; Mitsuhiro Nishida; Takahito Iga; Midori Morishita; Masaki Tezuka; Kiyoshi Mukai; Eisuke Kobayashi; Kota Watanabe
Journal:  J Spinal Cord Med       Date:  2017-10-25       Impact factor: 1.985

Review 9.  Aneurysmal bone cyst of the spine treated by concentrated bone marrow: clinical cases and review of the literature.

Authors:  Giovanni Barbanti-Brodano; Marco Girolami; Riccardo Ghermandi; Silvia Terzi; Alessandro Gasbarrini; Stefano Bandiera; Stefano Boriani
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2017-02-06       Impact factor: 3.134

10.  Denosumab: a potential new and innovative treatment option for aneurysmal bone cysts.

Authors:  Tobias Lange; Christoph Stehling; Birgit Fröhlich; Mark Klingenhöfer; Philip Kunkel; Reinhard Schneppenheim; Gabriele Escherich; Georg Gosheger; Jendrik Hardes; Heribert Jürgens; Tobias L Schulte
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2013-03-01       Impact factor: 3.134

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.