Guido Torzilli1, René Adam2, Luca Viganò1, Katsunori Imai2, Jeremias Goransky3, Andrea Fontana1, Christian Toso4, Pietro Majno4, Eduardo de Santibañes3. 1. Department of Surgery, Division of Hepatobiliary and General Surgery, Humanitas University, Hu-manitas Clinical and Research Hospital, Rozzano, Italy. 2. Centre Hépato-Biliaire, AP-HP, Hôpital Universitaire Paul Brousse, Villejuif, France. 3. Department of General Surgery, Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina. 4. Department of Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, University Hospitals of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The recent advent of more effective chemotherapy and the development of surgical procedures have expanded the pool of resectable patients with colorectal liver metastases (CLM). Two-stage hepatectomy (TSH), associated liver partition and portal vein ligation for staged hepatectomy (ALPPS), and ultrasound-guided enhanced one-stage hepatectomy (e-OSH) are the surgical solutions proposed for these patients, but the range of indications for these procedures vary from institution to institution. SUMMARY: The advantages and disadvantages of each approach are herein discussed. Patients who drop out between the staged operations of TSH limit its success rate, although predictive scores may help with patient selection and thereby optimize the results. Safety and oncological suitability are concerns to be addressed when considering ALPPS. These concerns notwithstanding, ALPPS has introduced an innovative concept in surgery: the monosegmental remnant liver. Studies involving e-OSH have proven the oncological suitability of tumor exposure once the CLM is detached from major intrahepatic vessels. This finding could expand the indications for e-OSH, although the technical challenges that it entails limit its spread among the surgical community. The liver-first approach involves the clearance of tumors from the liver before the colorectal primary is tackled. This approach fully justifies the complexity of e-OSH. KEY MESSAGES: Predictive scores limiting the interstage dropout of TSH, partial and monosegmental ALPPS, and R1 vascular e-OSH justified by solid long-term results represent new insights that could help refne the patient assignment to each of these approaches. Additionally, liver transplantation is an emerging treatment for CLM that should be taken into account.
BACKGROUND: The recent advent of more effective chemotherapy and the development of surgical procedures have expanded the pool of resectable patients with colorectal liver metastases (CLM). Two-stage hepatectomy (TSH), associated liver partition and portal vein ligation for staged hepatectomy (ALPPS), and ultrasound-guided enhanced one-stage hepatectomy (e-OSH) are the surgical solutions proposed for these patients, but the range of indications for these procedures vary from institution to institution. SUMMARY: The advantages and disadvantages of each approach are herein discussed. Patients who drop out between the staged operations of TSH limit its success rate, although predictive scores may help with patient selection and thereby optimize the results. Safety and oncological suitability are concerns to be addressed when considering ALPPS. These concerns notwithstanding, ALPPS has introduced an innovative concept in surgery: the monosegmental remnant liver. Studies involving e-OSH have proven the oncological suitability of tumor exposure once the CLM is detached from major intrahepatic vessels. This finding could expand the indications for e-OSH, although the technical challenges that it entails limit its spread among the surgical community. The liver-first approach involves the clearance of tumors from the liver before the colorectal primary is tackled. This approach fully justifies the complexity of e-OSH. KEY MESSAGES: Predictive scores limiting the interstage dropout of TSH, partial and monosegmental ALPPS, and R1 vascular e-OSH justified by solid long-term results represent new insights that could help refne the patient assignment to each of these approaches. Additionally, liver transplantation is an emerging treatment for CLM that should be taken into account.
Authors: Erik Schadde; Massimo Malagó; Roberto Hernandez-Alejandro; Jun Li; Eddie Abdalla; Victoria Ardiles; Georg Lurje; Soumil Vyas; Marcel A Machado; Eduardo de Santibañes Journal: Surgery Date: 2015-02-21 Impact factor: 3.982
Authors: M Narita; E Oussoultzoglou; D Jaeck; P Fuchschuber; E Rosso; P Pessaux; E Marzano; P Bachellier Journal: Br J Surg Date: 2011-06-28 Impact factor: 6.939
Authors: Andreas A Schnitzbauer; Sven A Lang; Holger Goessmann; Silvio Nadalin; Janine Baumgart; Stefan A Farkas; Stefan Fichtner-Feigl; Thomas Lorf; Armin Goralcyk; Rüdiger Hörbelt; Alexander Kroemer; Martin Loss; Petra Rümmele; Marcus N Scherer; Winfried Padberg; Alfred Königsrainer; Hauke Lang; Aiman Obed; Hans J Schlitt Journal: Ann Surg Date: 2012-03 Impact factor: 12.969
Authors: M Karoui; L Vigano; P Goyer; A Ferrero; A Luciani; M Aglietta; C Delbaldo; S Cirillo; L Capussotti; D Cherqui Journal: Br J Surg Date: 2010-09 Impact factor: 6.939
Authors: C Pedrazzani; G Turri; G Mantovani; C Conti; R Ziello; S Conci; T Campagnaro; A Ruzzenente; A Guglielmi Journal: Clin Transl Oncol Date: 2019-04-02 Impact factor: 3.405
Authors: Boris Guiu; Emmanuel Deshayes; Fabrizio Panaro; Florian Sanglier; Caterina Cusumano; Astrid Herrerro; Olivia Sgarbura; Nicolas Molinari; François Quenet; Christophe Cassinotto Journal: Ann Transl Med Date: 2021-05
Authors: Roberto Cannella; Adele Taibbi; Salvatore Pardo; Giuseppe Lo Re; Ludovico La Grutta; Tommaso Vincenzo Bartolotta Journal: BJR Open Date: 2019-04-29