Literature DB >> 23053369

How stable is perceived direction of gravity over extended periods in darkness?

A A Tarnutzer1, D P Fernando, A G Lasker, D S Zee.   

Abstract

Previous studies reported linear drift of perceived vertical for brief (≤10 min) observation periods. Here, we repeated estimates of direction of gravity up to 60 min to evaluate whether the drift is sustained, shows saturation or even reverses over time. Fifteen healthy human subjects repetitively adjusted a luminous line along subjective visual vertical (SVV) and horizontal (SVH) over periods of 5 min (constituting one block). We obtained seven blocks within 60 min in each subject for SVV and SVH. In between the first six blocks, subjects remained in darkness for 5 min each, whereas the lights were briefly turned on before block 7. We noted significantly (p < 0.05) increased errors in perceived direction of gravity by block 2 (SVV) and 3 (SVH). These increases disappeared after turning on the lights before block 7. Focusing on blocks 2-6, significant drift started from similar offset positions and pointed to the same direction in a majority of runs in 9/15 (SVV) and 11/15 (SVH) subjects. When pooling data from all blocks, orthogonality of errors was lost in all subjects. Trial-to-trial variability remained stable over the seven runs for SVV and SVH. Only when pooling all runs, precision was significantly (p < 0.05) higher for the SVH. Our findings suggest that perceived direction of gravity continues to fluctuate over extended recording periods with individuals showing unique patterns of direction-specific drift while variability remains stable. As subjects were upright during the entire experiment and as drift persisted over several blocks, sensory adaptation seems unlikely. We therefore favor a central origin of this kind of drift.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23053369     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-012-3230-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  19 in total

1.  Properties of the internal representation of gravity inferred from spatial-direction and body-tilt estimates.

Authors:  A D Van Beuzekom; J A Van Gisbergen
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  Bayesian integration in sensorimotor learning.

Authors:  Konrad P Körding; Daniel M Wolpert
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2004-01-15       Impact factor: 49.962

3.  Idiosyncratic compensation of the subjective visual horizontal and vertical in 60 patients after unilateral vestibular deafferentation.

Authors:  Anna Hafström; Per-Anders Fransson; Mikael Karlberg; Måns Magnusson
Journal:  Acta Otolaryngol       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 1.494

4.  Visually perceived vertical and visually perceived horizontal are not orthogonal.

Authors:  G A Betts; I S Curthoys
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 1.886

5.  Assessment of the perception of verticality and horizontality with self-paced saccades.

Authors:  V E Pettorossi; D Bambagioni; A M Bronstein; M A Gresty
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1998-07       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Interaction of labyrinthine and somatoreceptor inputs as determinants of the subjective vertical.

Authors:  S Lechner-Steinleitner
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  1978-03-03

7.  Temporal constancy of perceived direction of gravity assessed by visual line adjustments.

Authors:  A A Tarnutzer; D P Fernando; A Kheradmand; A G Lasker; D S Zee
Journal:  J Vestib Res       Date:  2012       Impact factor: 2.435

8.  Precision and accuracy of the subjective haptic vertical in the roll plane.

Authors:  Jeanine R Schuler; Christopher J Bockisch; Dominik Straumann; Alexander A Tarnutzer
Journal:  BMC Neurosci       Date:  2010-07-14       Impact factor: 3.288

9.  Multisensory integration: psychophysics, neurophysiology, and computation.

Authors:  Dora E Angelaki; Yong Gu; Gregory C DeAngelis
Journal:  Curr Opin Neurobiol       Date:  2009-07-16       Impact factor: 6.627

10.  Theories and models for 1/f(beta) noise in human movement science.

Authors:  Kjerstin Torre; Eric-Jan Wagenmakers
Journal:  Hum Mov Sci       Date:  2009-04-28       Impact factor: 2.161

View more
  4 in total

1.  Static Subjective Visual Vertical in Healthy Volunteers: The Effects of Different Preset Angle Deviations and Test-Retest Variability.

Authors:  J Venhovens; J Meulstee; W I M Verhagen
Journal:  Neuroophthalmology       Date:  2016-03-17

2.  Modulation of internal estimates of gravity during and after prolonged roll-tilts.

Authors:  Alexander A Tarnutzer; Giovanni Bertolini; Christopher J Bockisch; Dominik Straumann; Sarah Marti
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-10-10       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Upright Perception and Ocular Torsion Change Independently during Head Tilt.

Authors:  Jorge Otero-Millan; Amir Kheradmand
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2016-11-17       Impact factor: 3.169

Review 4.  Perception of Upright: Multisensory Convergence and the Role of Temporo-Parietal Cortex.

Authors:  Amir Kheradmand; Ariel Winnick
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2017-10-25       Impact factor: 4.003

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.