S Douglas1, S E Schild, D Rades. 1. Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Ratzeburger Allee 160, 23538, Lübeck, Germany.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: This study aimed to create and validate a survival score for patients with metastatic spinal cord compression (MSCC) from cancer of unknown primary. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The entire cohort (n = 182) was divided into a test group (n = 91) and a validation group (n = 91). In the test group, eight pretreatment factors including age, gender, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (ECOG-PS), number of involved vertebrae, ambulatory status, other bone metastases, visceral metastases, and time of developing motor deficits were retrospectively analyzed. RESULTS: The score included the prognostic factors that were significant for survival in the multivariate analysis (ECOG-PS, ambulatory status, visceral metastases, time of developing motor deficits). The score for each factor was determined by dividing the 6-month survival rate by 10. Prognostic scores represented the sum of the scores for the four factors and ranged from 5 to 20 points. The 6-month survival rates were 5% for < 14 points, 41% for 14-16 points, and 92% for > 16 points (p < 0.001). In the validation group, the 6-month survival rates were 7%, 38%, and 91% (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: This survival score can be considered valid and reproducible, since the survival rates of the validation group were comparable to those of the test group. This score can help when selecting the individual treatment and when counseling patients and relatives.
BACKGROUND: This study aimed to create and validate a survival score for patients with metastatic spinal cord compression (MSCC) from cancer of unknown primary. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The entire cohort (n = 182) was divided into a test group (n = 91) and a validation group (n = 91). In the test group, eight pretreatment factors including age, gender, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (ECOG-PS), number of involved vertebrae, ambulatory status, other bone metastases, visceral metastases, and time of developing motor deficits were retrospectively analyzed. RESULTS: The score included the prognostic factors that were significant for survival in the multivariate analysis (ECOG-PS, ambulatory status, visceral metastases, time of developing motor deficits). The score for each factor was determined by dividing the 6-month survival rate by 10. Prognostic scores represented the sum of the scores for the four factors and ranged from 5 to 20 points. The 6-month survival rates were 5% for < 14 points, 41% for 14-16 points, and 92% for > 16 points (p < 0.001). In the validation group, the 6-month survival rates were 7%, 38%, and 91% (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: This survival score can be considered valid and reproducible, since the survival rates of the validation group were comparable to those of the test group. This score can help when selecting the individual treatment and when counseling patients and relatives.
Authors: Roy A Patchell; Phillip A Tibbs; William F Regine; Richard Payne; Stephen Saris; Richard J Kryscio; Mohammed Mohiuddin; Byron Young Journal: Lancet Date: 2005 Aug 20-26 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Dirk Rades; Fabian Fehlauer; Theo Veninga; Lukas J A Stalpers; Hiba Basic; Peter J Hoskin; Volker Rudat; Johann H Karstens; Steven E Schild; Juergen Dunst Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 2006-11-02 Impact factor: 7.038
Authors: Dirk Rades; Jasmin N Evers; Amira Bajrovic; Theo Veninga; Johann H Karstens; Steven E Schild Journal: Strahlenther Onkol Date: 2014-03-22 Impact factor: 3.621
Authors: Frederick Mantel; Stefan Glatz; André Toussaint; Michael Flentje; Matthias Guckenberger Journal: Strahlenther Onkol Date: 2014-06-27 Impact factor: 3.621
Authors: N A Quraishi; D Ramoutar; D Sureshkumar; S R Manoharan; A Spencer; G Arealis; K L Edwards; B M Boszczyk Journal: Eur Spine J Date: 2014-04-02 Impact factor: 3.134
Authors: Dirk Rades; Oliver Blanck; Mai Trong Khoa; Pham VAN Thai; Nguyen Quang Hung; Liesa Dziggel; Steven E Schild Journal: In Vivo Date: 2018 Mar-Apr Impact factor: 2.155
Authors: Jeong Il Yu; Hee Chul Park; Yong Chan Ahn; Yoonsun Chung; Woong Sub Koom; Si Yeol Song Journal: Cancer Res Treat Date: 2015-12-02 Impact factor: 4.679