PURPOSE: Patients with long life expectancy despite metastatic status might benefit from long-term local control of spinal metastases. Dose-intensified radiotherapy (RT) is believed to control tumor growth better and thus offers longer pain relief. This single-institution study reports on fractionated stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) for spinal metastases in patients with good life expectancy based on performance status, extent of metastases, histology, and time to metastasis. METHODS: Between 2004 and 2010, 36 treatment sites in 32 patients (median age 55 years; male 61%; median Karnofsky performance score 85) were treated with fractionated SBRT. The median treatment dose was 60 Gy (range, 48.5-65 Gy) given in a median of 20 fractions (range, 17-33); the median maximum dose to the planning risk volume for the spinal cord (PRV-SC) was 46.6 Gy. RESULTS: All patients suffering from pain prior to RT reported pain relief after treatment; after a median follow-up of 20.3 months, 61% of treatment sites were pain-free, another 25% associated with mild pain. In 86% of treatments, patients were free from neurological symptoms at the time of the last clinical follow-up. Acute grade 1 toxicities (CTCAE 3.0) were observed in 11 patients. Myelopathy did not occur in any patient. Radiologically controlled freedom from local progression was 92 and 84% after 12 and 24 months, respectively. Median overall survival (OS) was 19.6 months. CONCLUSION: Patient selection resulted in long OS despite metastatic disease, and dose-intensified fractionated SBRT for spinal metastases was safe and achieved long-term local tumor control and palliation of pain.
PURPOSE:Patients with long life expectancy despite metastatic status might benefit from long-term local control of spinal metastases. Dose-intensified radiotherapy (RT) is believed to control tumor growth better and thus offers longer pain relief. This single-institution study reports on fractionated stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) for spinal metastases in patients with good life expectancy based on performance status, extent of metastases, histology, and time to metastasis. METHODS: Between 2004 and 2010, 36 treatment sites in 32 patients (median age 55 years; male 61%; median Karnofsky performance score 85) were treated with fractionated SBRT. The median treatment dose was 60 Gy (range, 48.5-65 Gy) given in a median of 20 fractions (range, 17-33); the median maximum dose to the planning risk volume for the spinal cord (PRV-SC) was 46.6 Gy. RESULTS: All patients suffering from pain prior to RT reported pain relief after treatment; after a median follow-up of 20.3 months, 61% of treatment sites were pain-free, another 25% associated with mild pain. In 86% of treatments, patients were free from neurological symptoms at the time of the last clinical follow-up. Acute grade 1 toxicities (CTCAE 3.0) were observed in 11 patients. Myelopathy did not occur in any patient. Radiologically controlled freedom from local progression was 92 and 84% after 12 and 24 months, respectively. Median overall survival (OS) was 19.6 months. CONCLUSION:Patient selection resulted in long OS despite metastatic disease, and dose-intensified fractionated SBRT for spinal metastases was safe and achieved long-term local tumor control and palliation of pain.
Authors: Xin Shelley Wang; Laurence D Rhines; Almon S Shiu; James N Yang; Ugur Selek; Ibrahima Gning; Ping Liu; Pamela K Allen; Syed S Azeem; Paul D Brown; Hadley J Sharp; David C Weksberg; Charles S Cleeland; Eric L Chang Journal: Lancet Oncol Date: 2012-01-27 Impact factor: 41.316
Authors: Mark H Bilsky; Ilya Laufer; Daryl R Fourney; Michael Groff; Meic H Schmidt; Peter Paul Varga; Frank D Vrionis; Yoshiya Yamada; Peter C Gerszten; Timothy R Kuklo Journal: J Neurosurg Spine Date: 2010-09
Authors: Yoshiya Yamada; Mark H Bilsky; D Michael Lovelock; Ennapadam S Venkatraman; Sean Toner; Jared Johnson; Joan Zatcky; Michael J Zelefsky; Zvi Fuks Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 2008-01-30 Impact factor: 7.038
Authors: Amit K Garg; Almon S Shiu; James Yang; Xin-Shelley Wang; Pamela Allen; Barry W Brown; Patricia Grossman; Erik K Frija; Mary Frances McAleer; Syed Azeem; Paul D Brown; Laurence D Rhines; Eric L Chang Journal: Cancer Date: 2012-04-17 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: Marcelo V R Cunha; Ameen Al-Omair; Eshetu G Atenafu; Giuseppina Laura Masucci; Daniel Letourneau; Renee Korol; Eugene Yu; Peter Howard; Fiona Lochray; Leodante B da Costa; Michael G Fehlings; Arjun Sahgal Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 2012-06-01 Impact factor: 7.038
Authors: Peter S Rose; Ilya Laufer; Patrick J Boland; Andrew Hanover; Mark H Bilsky; Josh Yamada; Eric Lis Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2009-09-08 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Roman O Kowalchuk; Michael R Waters; K Martin Richardson; Kelly Spencer; James M Larner; Jason P Sheehan; William H McAllister; Charles R Kersh Journal: J Radiosurg SBRT Date: 2020
Authors: Garrett Jensen; Chad Tang; Kenneth R Hess; Andrew J Bishop; Hubert Y Pan; Jing Li; James N Yang; Nizar M Tannir; Behrang Amini; Claudio Tatsui; Laurence Rhines; Paul D Brown; Amol J Ghia Journal: J Radiosurg SBRT Date: 2017
Authors: André Toussaint; Anne Richter; Frederick Mantel; John C Flickinger; Inga Siiner Grills; Neelam Tyagi; Arjun Sahgal; Daniel Letourneau; Jason P Sheehan; David J Schlesinger; Peter Carlos Gerszten; Matthias Guckenberger Journal: Radiat Oncol Date: 2016-04-18 Impact factor: 3.481