Literature DB >> 2305208

The benefit of colonoscopy.

E Brenna1, K Skreden, H L Waldum, R Mårvik, J H Dybdahl, P M Kleveland, A K Sandvik, T Halvorsen, H E Myrvold, H Petersen.   

Abstract

In a prospective study involving 833 consecutive outpatient and open-access colonoscopies, attempts were made to characterize the benefit of colonoscopy in terms of both predicted and unpredicted findings and therapeutic procedures. The endoscopist therefore predicted the endoscopic findings before the endoscopy. The results were compared for the different indications for colonoscopy. The overall agreement between the predictions and the colonoscopic findings was 61%. Clinically significant abnormalities were found in about half the examinations. The most frequent abnormal findings were benign polyps (24%), inflammatory bowel disease (17%), and malignancy (5%). In about half the patients with a malignancy the indication for colonoscopy was rectal bleeding, and half of the malignancies were not predicted. The greatest benefit of colonoscopy was found in patients referred because of overt rectal bleeding or occult faecal blood, and abnormal barium enema or endoscopy findings. The importance of complete colonoscopy in connection with operation for colorectal carcinoma is emphasized.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2305208     DOI: 10.3109/00365529008999213

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Scand J Gastroenterol        ISSN: 0036-5521            Impact factor:   2.423


  9 in total

1.  Appropriateness of outpatient gastrointestinal endoscopy in a non-academic hospital.

Authors:  João Mangualde; Marie I Cremers; Ana M Vieira; Ricardo Freire; Elia Gamito; Cristina Lobato; Ana L Alves; Fátima Augusto; Ana P Oliveira
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2011-10-16

2.  Colonoscopic evaluation of hematochezia in low and average risk patients for colorectal cancer: a prospective study.

Authors:  Puglisi Carlo; Russo-Francesco Paolo; Barbera Carmelo; Incarbone Salvatore; Aprile Giuseppe; Bonanno Giacomo; Russo Antonio
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2006-12-07       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 3.  Most bowel cancer symptoms do not indicate colorectal cancer and polyps: a systematic review.

Authors:  Barbara-Ann Adelstein; Petra Macaskill; Siew F Chan; Peter H Katelaris; Les Irwig
Journal:  BMC Gastroenterol       Date:  2011-05-30       Impact factor: 3.067

4.  Risk related surveillance following colorectal polypectomy.

Authors:  G Nusko; U Mansmann; Th Kirchner; E G Hahn
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 23.059

5.  A survey of abnormalities in the colon and rectum in patients with haemorrhoids.

Authors:  Mark V Koning; Ruud J L F Loffeld
Journal:  BMC Gastroenterol       Date:  2010-07-07       Impact factor: 3.067

6.  Risk of advanced metachronous colorectal adenoma during long-term follow-up.

Authors:  G Nusko; E G Hahn; U Mansmann
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2008-07-03       Impact factor: 2.571

Review 7.  Occurrence and clinical significance of overt blood loss per rectum in the general population and in medical practice.

Authors:  G H Fijten; G H Blijham; J A Knottnerus
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  1994-07       Impact factor: 5.386

8.  Triage of colonoscopies: open access endoscopy versus outpatient consultation with a gastroenterologist.

Authors:  C D Wichers; N C M van Heel; F Ter Borg; M A van Herwaarden
Journal:  Endosc Int Open       Date:  2014-09-17

9.  Comparative analysis of diagnostic colonoscopy in symptomatic young adults from South Korea and the United States.

Authors:  Min Seob Kwak; Jae Myung Cha; Jeong-Sik Byeon; Otto S Lin; Richard A Kozarek
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2017-09       Impact factor: 1.889

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.