Literature DB >> 23051686

Bladder dose accumulation based on a biomechanical deformable image registration algorithm in volumetric modulated arc therapy for prostate cancer.

E S Andersen1, L P Muren, T S Sørensen, K O Noe, M Thor, J B Petersen, M Høyer, L Bentzen, K Tanderup.   

Abstract

Variations in bladder position, shape and volume cause uncertainties in the doses delivered to this organ during a course of radiotherapy for pelvic tumors. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the potential of dose accumulation based on repeat imaging and deformable image registration (DIR) to improve the accuracy of bladder dose assessment. For each of nine prostate cancer patients, the initial treatment plan was re-calculated on eight to nine repeat computed tomography (CT) scans. The planned bladder dose-volume histogram (DVH) parameters were compared to corresponding parameters derived from DIR-based accumulations as well as DVH summation based on dose re-calculations. It was found that the deviations between the DIR-based accumulations and the planned treatment were substantial and ranged (-0.5-2.3) Gy and (-9.4-13.5) Gy for D(2%) and D(mean), respectively, whereas the deviations between DIR-based accumulations and DVH summation were small and well within 1 Gy. For the investigated treatment scenario, DIR-based bladder dose accumulation did not result in substantial improvement of dose estimation as compared to the straightforward DVH summation. Large variations were found in individual patients between the doses from the initial treatment plan and the accumulated bladder doses. Hence, the use of repeat imaging has a potential for improved accuracy in treatment dose reporting.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23051686     DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/57/21/7089

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Med Biol        ISSN: 0031-9155            Impact factor:   3.609


  14 in total

1.  On voxel-by-voxel accumulated dose for prostate radiation therapy using deformable image registration.

Authors:  Jialu Yu; Nicholas Hardcastle; Kyoungkeun Jeong; Edward T Bender; Mark A Ritter; Wolfgang A Tomé
Journal:  Technol Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2014-11-11

2.  [Rectal toxicity prediction based on accurate rectal surface dose summation for cervical cancer radiotherapy].

Authors:  Jia-Wei Chen; Hai-Bin Chen; Qiang He; Yu-Liang Liao; Xin Zhen
Journal:  Nan Fang Yi Ke Da Xue Xue Bao       Date:  2017-12-20

3.  Machine Learning on a Genome-wide Association Study to Predict Late Genitourinary Toxicity After Prostate Radiation Therapy.

Authors:  Sangkyu Lee; Sarah Kerns; Harry Ostrer; Barry Rosenstein; Joseph O Deasy; Jung Hun Oh
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2018-01-31       Impact factor: 7.038

4.  Performance validation of deformable image registration in the pelvic region.

Authors:  V Zambrano; H Furtado; D Fabri; C Lütgendorf-Caucig; J Góra; M Stock; R Mayer; W Birkfellner; D Georg
Journal:  J Radiat Res       Date:  2013-07       Impact factor: 2.724

5.  Bladder surface dose modeling in prostate cancer radiotherapy: An analysis of motion-induced variations and the cumulative dose across the treatment.

Authors:  Yi Lao; Minsong Cao; Yingli Yang; Amar U Kishan; Wensha Yang; Yalin Wang; Ke Sheng
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2021-11-16       Impact factor: 4.071

6.  Dose/volume-response relations for rectal morbidity using planned and simulated motion-inclusive dose distributions.

Authors:  Maria Thor; Aditya Apte; Joseph O Deasy; Àsa Karlsdóttir; Vitali Moiseenko; Mitchell Liu; Ludvig Paul Muren
Journal:  Radiother Oncol       Date:  2013-11-11       Impact factor: 6.280

7.  Dosimetric impact of organ at risk daily variation during prostate stereotactic ablative radiotherapy.

Authors:  Lynsey Devlin; David Dodds; Azmat Sadozye; Philip McLoone; Nicholas MacLeod; Carolynn Lamb; Suzanne Currie; Stefanie Thomson; Aileen Duffton
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2020-01-30       Impact factor: 3.039

8.  A multicentre comparison of the dosimetric impact of inter- and intra-fractional anatomical variations in fractionated cervix cancer brachytherapy.

Authors:  Nicole Nesvacil; Kari Tanderup; Taran P Hellebust; Astrid De Leeuw; Stefan Lang; Sandy Mohamed; Swamidas V Jamema; Clare Anderson; Richard Pötter; Christian Kirisits
Journal:  Radiother Oncol       Date:  2013-04-18       Impact factor: 6.280

9.  Equivalence of Gyn GEC-ESTRO guidelines for image guided cervical brachytherapy with EUD-based dose prescription.

Authors:  William Shaw; William I D Rae; Markus L Alber
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2013-11-13       Impact factor: 3.481

10.  A quantitative comparison of the performance of three deformable registration algorithms in radiotherapy.

Authors:  Daniella Fabri; Valentina Zambrano; Amon Bhatia; Hugo Furtado; Helmar Bergmann; Markus Stock; Christoph Bloch; Carola Lütgendorf-Caucig; Supriyanto Pawiro; Dietmar Georg; Wolfgang Birkfellner; Michael Figl
Journal:  Z Med Phys       Date:  2013-08-19       Impact factor: 4.820

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.