Literature DB >> 2305059

Normal left ventricular dimensions and function: interstudy reproducibility of measurements with cine MR imaging.

R C Semelka1, E Tomei, S Wagner, J Mayo, C Kondo, J Suzuki, G R Caputo, C B Higgins.   

Abstract

The authors evaluated the reproducibility of measurements of ventricular dimensions obtained with cine magnetic resonance (MR) imaging performed on two occasions in 11 healthy subjects. Two reviewers analyzed the studies in a blinded fashion to determine interobserver and interstudy variability of measurements of left ventricular (LV) mass, volume, ejection fraction, and systolic wall stress. LV mass showed good reproducibility between studies, with 3.6% and 3.8% variability for LV end-systolic mass for the two observers. LV end-diastolic volume varied by 5.2% and 3.9%, and LV end-systolic volume, by 9.7% and 0.9%. Variability for LV ejection fraction was 5.0% and 4.9%. The largest interstudy variability was end-systolic wall stress, 11.1% and 13.5%, which was due mostly to changes in arterial pressure between the two studies. It is concluded that anatomic and functional measurements from cine MR images are reproducible between studies. The small interstudy variability is likely related to the fact the measurements are derived directly from cine MR images that encompass the entire heart rather than depend on measurements of only sample images and the use of geometric models.

Mesh:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2305059     DOI: 10.1148/radiology.174.3.2305059

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiology        ISSN: 0033-8419            Impact factor:   11.105


  73 in total

1.  Evaluation of left ventricular wall motion, volumes, and ejection fraction by gated myocardial tomography with technetium 99m-labeled tetrofosmin: a comparison with cine magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  P Vaduganathan; Z X He; G W Vick; J J Mahmarian; M S Verani
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  1999 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 5.952

2.  In vitro determination of cardiac ventricular volumes using MRI at 1.0 T in a porcine heart model.

Authors:  J A Koch; L W Poll; E Godehardt; B Korbmacher; G Jung; U Mödder
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 2.357

3.  Comparison between ECTb and QGS for assessment of left ventricular function from gated myocardial perfusion SPECT.

Authors:  Kenneth Nichols; Cesar A Santana; Russell Folks; Elizabeth Krawczynska; C David Cooke; Tracy L Faber; Steven R Bergmann; Ernest V Garcia
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2002 May-Jun       Impact factor: 5.952

Review 4.  Magnetic resonance imaging in valvular heart disease.

Authors:  M Schmidt; J Crnac; B Dederichs; P Theissen; H Schicha; U Sechtem
Journal:  Int J Card Imaging       Date:  1997-06

5.  Dual breath-hold magnetic resonance cine evaluation of global and regional cardiac function.

Authors:  Bernd J Wintersperger; Spencer Sincleair; Val M Runge; Olaf Dietrich; Armin Huber; Maximilian F Reiser; Stefan O Schoenberg
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2006-04-22       Impact factor: 5.315

6.  Improved functional cardiac MR imaging using the intravascular contrast agent CLARISCAN.

Authors:  I Paetsch; H Thiele; B Schnackenburg; A Bornstedt; A Müller-York; J Schwab; E Fleck; E Nagel
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 2.357

7.  ACCF/ACR/AHA/NASCI/SCMR 2010 expert consensus document on cardiovascular magnetic resonance: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation Task Force on Expert Consensus Documents.

Authors:  W Gregory Hundley; David A Bluemke; J Paul Finn; Scott D Flamm; Mark A Fogel; Matthias G Friedrich; Vincent B Ho; Michael Jerosch-Herold; Christopher M Kramer; Warren J Manning; Manesh Patel; Gerald M Pohost; Arthur E Stillman; Richard D White; Pamela K Woodard
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2010-05-17       Impact factor: 29.690

Review 8.  ACCF/ACR/AHA/NASCI/SCMR 2010 expert consensus document on cardiovascular magnetic resonance: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation Task Force on Expert Consensus Documents.

Authors:  W Gregory Hundley; David A Bluemke; J Paul Finn; Scott D Flamm; Mark A Fogel; Matthias G Friedrich; Vincent B Ho; Michael Jerosch-Herold; Christopher M Kramer; Warren J Manning; Manesh Patel; Gerald M Pohost; Arthur E Stillman; Richard D White; Pamela K Woodard
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2010-06-08       Impact factor: 24.094

9.  Non-invasive cardiac evaluation in heart failure patients using magnetic resonance imaging: a feasibility study.

Authors:  Stephanie M Shors; William G Cotts; Biljana Pavlovic-Surjancev; Mihai Gheorghiade; James C Carr; Richard M McCarthy; Scott F Pereles; Paul J Finn
Journal:  Heart Fail Rev       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 4.214

10.  Compressed sensing real-time cine imaging for assessment of ventricular function, volumes and mass in clinical practice.

Authors:  Mathilde Vermersch; Benjamin Longère; Augustin Coisne; Michaela Schmidt; Christoph Forman; Aurélien Monnet; Julien Pagniez; Valentina Silvestri; Arianna Simeone; Emma Cheasty; David Montaigne; François Pontana
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2019-08-01       Impact factor: 5.315

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.