Literature DB >> 2305038

Asymmetric field inversion gel electrophoresis: a new method for detecting DNA double-strand breaks in mammalian cells.

T D Stamato1, N Denko.   

Abstract

A new method is described for detecting DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) that utilizes asymmetric field inversion gel electrophoresis (AFIGE). DNA purified from cells in agarose plugs is subjected to AFIGE and DNA breakage quantitated by the fraction of DNA released from the plug. To test the specificity of the method for DNA DSBs, purified DNA in agarose plugs was treated for increasing times with restriction endonuclease, XhoI. After an initial time period, the fraction of DNA released increased in direct proportion to time. This correlates with the expected response for a randomly broken DNA molecule. In contrast, treatment with the single-strand breaking agent, hydrogen peroxide, over a 1000-fold range produced no release of DNA from the plug. Thus the assay appears to be specific for DNA DSBs and was used to measure DNA breaks induced by gamma radiation. Purified DNA, irradiated in agarose plugs, exhibited a log-linear dose response up to doses that release greater than 90% DNA from the plug. When live cells were irradiated in agarose, a similar linear dose response was observed up to 40 Gy and a significant signal as low as 2.5 Gy. Also in live cells, a threefold lower percentage of DNA was released from the plug over the same dose range. However, less DNA per gray is released at doses above 40 Gy and may reflect a crosslinking effect produced by the irradiation of DNA in live cells. DNA which was "pulse-labeled" was used to test the effect of DNA replication on the ability of AFIGE to detect DNA DSBs. Replicating DNA irradiated in the cell or after purification exhibited a reduced rate of release from the plug per dose of irradiation. Overall, the above results indicate that AFIGE is a sensitive method for detecting DSBs in DNA.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2305038

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiat Res        ISSN: 0033-7587            Impact factor:   2.841


  18 in total

1.  Gross chromosomal rearrangements and genetic exchange between nonhomologous chromosomes following BRCA2 inactivation.

Authors:  V P Yu; M Koehler; C Steinlein; M Schmid; L A Hanakahi; A J van Gool; S C West; A R Venkitaraman
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  2000-06-01       Impact factor: 11.361

2.  Clusters of S1 nuclease-hypersensitive sites induced in vivo by DNA damage.

Authors:  J Legault; A Tremblay; D Ramotar; M E Mirault
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  1997-09       Impact factor: 4.272

3.  Evidence for DNA-PK-dependent and -independent DNA double-strand break repair pathways in mammalian cells as a function of the cell cycle.

Authors:  S E Lee; R A Mitchell; A Cheng; E A Hendrickson
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  1997-03       Impact factor: 4.272

4.  Alkylation DNA damage in combination with PARP inhibition results in formation of S-phase-dependent double-strand breaks.

Authors:  Michelle L Heacock; Donna F Stefanick; Julie K Horton; Samuel H Wilson
Journal:  DNA Repair (Amst)       Date:  2010-06-22

5.  Evidence for a G2 checkpoint in p53-independent apoptosis induction by X-irradiation.

Authors:  Z Han; D Chatterjee; D M He; J Early; P Pantazis; J H Wyche; E A Hendrickson
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  1995-11       Impact factor: 4.272

6.  Detection of heavy-ion-induced DNA double-strand breaks using static-field gel electrophoresis.

Authors:  G Taucher-Scholz; J Heilmann; M Schneider; G Kraft
Journal:  Radiat Environ Biophys       Date:  1995-06       Impact factor: 1.925

7.  Combination of static-field gel electrophoresis and densitometric scanning for the determination of radiation-induced DNA double-strand breaks in CHO cells.

Authors:  M Schneider; G Taucher-Scholz; J Heilmann; G Kraft
Journal:  Radiat Environ Biophys       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 1.925

8.  Randomly distributed DNA double-strand breaks as measured by pulsed field gel electrophoresis: a series of explanatory calculations.

Authors:  B Cedervall; P Källman
Journal:  Radiat Environ Biophys       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 1.925

9.  Loratadine dysregulates cell cycle progression and enhances the effect of radiation in human tumor cell lines.

Authors:  Benjamin P Soule; Nicole L Simone; William G DeGraff; Rajani Choudhuri; John A Cook; James B Mitchell
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2010-02-03       Impact factor: 3.481

10.  Camptothecin cytotoxicity in mammalian cells is associated with the induction of persistent double strand breaks in replicating DNA.

Authors:  A J Ryan; S Squires; H L Strutt; R T Johnson
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  1991-06-25       Impact factor: 16.971

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.