Literature DB >> 20573551

Alkylation DNA damage in combination with PARP inhibition results in formation of S-phase-dependent double-strand breaks.

Michelle L Heacock1, Donna F Stefanick, Julie K Horton, Samuel H Wilson.   

Abstract

The combination of poly(ADP-ribose)polymerase (PARP) inhibitors and alkylating agents is currently being investigated in cancer therapy clinical trials. However, the DNA lesions producing the synergistic cell killing effect in tumors are not fully understood. Treatment of human and mouse fibroblasts with the monofunctional DNA methylating agent methyl methanesulfonate (MMS) in the presence of a PARP inhibitor has been shown to trigger a cell cycle checkpoint response. Among other changes, this DNA damage response to combination treatment includes activation of ATM/Chk2 and phosphorylation of histone H2A.X. These changes are consistent with DNA double-strand break (DSB) formation during the response, but the measurement of DSBs has not been addressed. Such DSB evaluation is important in understanding this DNA damage response because events other than DSB formation are known to lead to ATM/Chk2 activation and H2A.X phosphorylation. Here, we examined the structural integrity of genomic DNA after the combined treatment of cells with MMS and a PARP inhibitor, i.e., exposure to a sub-lethal dose of MMS in the presence of the PARP inhibitor 4-amino-1,8-napthalimide (4-AN). We used pulsed field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) for measurement of DSBs in both human and mouse embryonic fibroblasts, and flow cytometry to follow the phosphorylated form of H2A.X (gamma-H2A.X). The results indicate that DSBs are formed with the combination treatment, but not following treatment with either agent alone. Our data also show that formation of gamma-H2A.X correlates with PARP-1-expressing cells in S-phase of the cell cycle. The observations support the model that persistence of PARP-1 at base excision repair intermediates, as cells move into S-phase, leads to DSBs and the attendant checkpoint responses. Published by Elsevier B.V.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20573551      PMCID: PMC2914189          DOI: 10.1016/j.dnarep.2010.05.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  DNA Repair (Amst)        ISSN: 1568-7856


  48 in total

1.  Methods for the quantification of DNA double-strand breaks determined from the distribution of DNA fragment sizes measured by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis.

Authors:  B Cedervall; R Wong; N Albright; J Dynlacht; P Lambin; W C Dewey
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  1995-07       Impact factor: 2.841

2.  A non-radioactive, PFGE-based assay for low levels of DNA double-strand breaks in mammalian cells.

Authors:  Iwona Gradzka; Teresa Iwaneńko
Journal:  DNA Repair (Amst)       Date:  2005-09-28

3.  DNA repair defect in poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase-deficient cell lines.

Authors:  C Trucco; F J Oliver; G de Murcia; J Ménissier-de Murcia
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  1998-06-01       Impact factor: 16.971

4.  Requirement of mammalian DNA polymerase-beta in base-excision repair.

Authors:  R W Sobol; J K Horton; R Kühn; H Gu; R K Singhal; R Prasad; K Rajewsky; S H Wilson
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1996-01-11       Impact factor: 49.962

5.  PARP-2, A novel mammalian DNA damage-dependent poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase.

Authors:  J C Amé; V Rolli; V Schreiber; C Niedergang; F Apiou; P Decker; S Muller; T Höger; J Ménissier-de Murcia; G de Murcia
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  1999-06-18       Impact factor: 5.157

6.  Immortalization and characterization of Nijmegen Breakage syndrome fibroblasts.

Authors:  M Kraakman-van der Zwet; W J Overkamp; A A Friedl; B Klein; G W Verhaegh; N G Jaspers; A T Midro; F Eckardt-Schupp; P H Lohman; M Z Zdzienicka
Journal:  Mutat Res       Date:  1999-05-14       Impact factor: 2.433

7.  Poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase activity prevents signaling pathways for cell cycle arrest after DNA methylating agent exposure.

Authors:  Julie K Horton; Donna F Stefanick; Jana M Naron; Padmini S Kedar; Samuel H Wilson
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2005-02-07       Impact factor: 5.157

8.  ATM is required for the cellular response to thymidine induced replication fork stress.

Authors:  Emma Bolderson; Jennifer Scorah; Thomas Helleday; Carl Smythe; Mark Meuth
Journal:  Hum Mol Genet       Date:  2004-09-30       Impact factor: 6.150

9.  Specific killing of BRCA2-deficient tumours with inhibitors of poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase.

Authors:  Helen E Bryant; Niklas Schultz; Huw D Thomas; Kayan M Parker; Dan Flower; Elena Lopez; Suzanne Kyle; Mark Meuth; Nicola J Curtin; Thomas Helleday
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2005-04-14       Impact factor: 69.504

10.  Targeting the DNA repair defect in BRCA mutant cells as a therapeutic strategy.

Authors:  Hannah Farmer; Nuala McCabe; Christopher J Lord; Andrew N J Tutt; Damian A Johnson; Tobias B Richardson; Manuela Santarosa; Krystyna J Dillon; Ian Hickson; Charlotte Knights; Niall M B Martin; Stephen P Jackson; Graeme C M Smith; Alan Ashworth
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2005-04-14       Impact factor: 69.504

View more
  28 in total

1.  The ups and downs of DNA repair biomarkers for PARP inhibitor therapies.

Authors:  Xiaozhe Wang; David T Weaver
Journal:  Am J Cancer Res       Date:  2010-01-03       Impact factor: 6.166

2.  Metabolic responses induced by DNA damage and poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibition in MCF-7 cells.

Authors:  Vijesh J Bhute; Sean P Palecek
Journal:  Metabolomics       Date:  2015-07-30       Impact factor: 4.290

3.  Inter-individual variation in DNA repair capacity: a need for multi-pathway functional assays to promote translational DNA repair research.

Authors:  Zachary D Nagel; Isaac A Chaim; Leona D Samson
Journal:  DNA Repair (Amst)       Date:  2014-04-26

4.  Increased PARP-1 association with DNA in alkylation damaged, PARP-inhibited mouse fibroblasts.

Authors:  Padmini S Kedar; Donna F Stefanick; Julie K Horton; Samuel H Wilson
Journal:  Mol Cancer Res       Date:  2012-01-13       Impact factor: 5.852

5.  The PARP inhibitor ABT-888 synergizes irinotecan treatment of colon cancer cell lines.

Authors:  David Davidson; Yunzhe Wang; Raquel Aloyz; Lawrence Panasci
Journal:  Invest New Drugs       Date:  2012-10-09       Impact factor: 3.850

6.  A PET imaging agent for evaluating PARP-1 expression in ovarian cancer.

Authors:  Mehran Makvandi; Austin Pantel; Lauren Schwartz; Erin Schubert; Kuiying Xu; Chia-Ju Hsieh; Catherine Hou; Hyoung Kim; Chi-Chang Weng; Harrison Winters; Robert Doot; Michael D Farwell; Daniel A Pryma; Roger A Greenberg; David A Mankoff; Fiona Simpkins; Robert H Mach; Lilie L Lin
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  2018-04-16       Impact factor: 14.808

7.  Requirement for NBS1 in the S phase checkpoint response to DNA methylation combined with PARP inhibition.

Authors:  Julie K Horton; Donna F Stefanick; Jennifer Y Zeng; Michael J Carrozza; Samuel H Wilson
Journal:  DNA Repair (Amst)       Date:  2010-12-03

8.  DNA damage responsive miR-33b-3p promoted lung cancer cells survival and cisplatin resistance by targeting p21WAF1/CIP1.

Authors:  Shun Xu; Haijiao Huang; Yu-Ning Chen; Yun-Ting Deng; Bing Zhang; Xing-Dong Xiong; Yuan Yuan; Yanmei Zhu; Haiyong Huang; Luoyijun Xie; Xinguang Liu
Journal:  Cell Cycle       Date:  2016-08-25       Impact factor: 4.534

9.  Base excision repair defects invoke hypersensitivity to PARP inhibition.

Authors:  Julie K Horton; Donna F Stefanick; Rajendra Prasad; Natalie R Gassman; Padmini S Kedar; Samuel H Wilson
Journal:  Mol Cancer Res       Date:  2014-04-25       Impact factor: 5.852

10.  Preventing oxidation of cellular XRCC1 affects PARP-mediated DNA damage responses.

Authors:  Julie K Horton; Donna F Stefanick; Natalie R Gassman; Jason G Williams; Scott A Gabel; Matthew J Cuneo; Rajendra Prasad; Padmini S Kedar; Eugene F Derose; Esther W Hou; Robert E London; Samuel H Wilson
Journal:  DNA Repair (Amst)       Date:  2013-07-18
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.