Literature DB >> 2305030

Studies of the mortality of A-bomb survivors. 9. Mortality, 1950-1985: Part 2. Cancer mortality based on the recently revised doses (DS86).

Y Shimizu1, H Kato, W J Schull.   

Abstract

The present study, the ninth in a series that began in 1961, extends the time of surveillance 3 more years and covers the period 1950-1985. It is based on the recently revised doses, termed the DS86. The impact of the change from the T65D to the DS86 on the dose-response relationships for cancer mortality was described in the first of this series of reports. Here, the focus is on cancer mortality among the 76,000 A-bomb survivors within the LSS sample for whom DS86 doses have been estimated, with the emphasis on biological issues associated with radiation carcinogenesis. Briefly, the following is found: The excess in leukemia mortality has continued to decline with time, but remains slightly but significantly elevated in 1981-1985 in Hiroshima. For cancers other than leukemia, as a group, excess deaths continue to increase over time in direct proportion to the normal increase in natural cancer mortality with increasing age, and the relative risk seems unchanged over time within age ATB cohorts. The single exception is the cohort under 10 years of age ATB. Within this group of survivors, where the relative risk, although based on relatively few deaths, has been quite high at the higher doses, as judged by deaths before the age of 30, the risk has fallen and has remained fairly constant at a lower level thereafter. Thus the present analysis still supports, in the main, estimation of lifetime risk based on the assumption of a constant relative risk. For the same age ATD, both the relative and absolute risks are higher for younger age ATB cohorts than older ones for cancers other than leukemia. There is no statistically significant difference in excess deaths between males and females except for leukemia, though the relative risk is higher for females than for males, significantly so for cancers of the esophagus and lung, reflecting the higher background cancer rate for males. Significant dose responses are observed for leukemia, cancers of the esophagus, stomach, colon, lung, breast, ovary, and urinary bladder and multiple myeloma, as previously observed. No significant increase is demonstrable as yet for cancers of the rectum, gallbladder, pancreas, uterus, and prostate and malignant lymphoma. In the present report, cancers of the bone, pharynx, nose, and larynx, and skin except melanoma are also examined, but none of these sites show a significant increase with dose.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2305030

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiat Res        ISSN: 0033-7587            Impact factor:   2.841


  41 in total

1.  The statistical power of epidemiological studies analyzing the relationship between exposure to ionizing radiation and cancer, with special reference to childhood leukemia and natural background radiation.

Authors:  M P Little; R Wakeford; J H Lubin; G M Kendall
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 2.841

2.  Solid tumor risks after high doses of ionizing radiation.

Authors:  Rainer K Sachs; David J Brenner
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2005-09-06       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Epidemiological designs in radioepidemiological research.

Authors:  E Cardis; J Estève
Journal:  Soz Praventivmed       Date:  1991

4.  Lessons of Chernobyl.

Authors:  S C Darby; G K Reeves
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1991-11-30

5.  Atomic bomb health benefits.

Authors:  T D Luckey
Journal:  Dose Response       Date:  2008-08-11       Impact factor: 2.658

6.  Factors affecting recognition of cancer risks of nuclear workers.

Authors:  M Little; C Sharp
Journal:  Occup Environ Med       Date:  1996-07       Impact factor: 4.402

7.  Trends in childhood leukaemia in the Nordic countries in relation to fallout from atmospheric nuclear weapons testing.

Authors:  S C Darby; J H Olsen; R Doll; B Thakrar; P D Brown; H H Storm; L Barlow; F Langmark; L Teppo; H Tulinius
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1992-04-18

8.  Cancer mortality risk among military participants of a 1958 atmospheric nuclear weapons test.

Authors:  K K Watanabe; H K Kang; N A Dalager
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1995-04       Impact factor: 9.308

9.  Positive associations between ionizing radiation and lymphoma mortality among men.

Authors:  David B Richardson; Hiromi Sugiyama; Steve Wing; Ritsu Sakata; Eric Grant; Yukiko Shimizu; Nobuo Nishi; Susan Geyer; Midori Soda; Akihiko Suyama; Fumiyoshi Kasagi; Kazunori Kodama
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2009-03-06       Impact factor: 4.897

Review 10.  Cancer risk at low doses of ionizing radiation: artificial neural networks inference from atomic bomb survivors.

Authors:  Masao S Sasaki; Akira Tachibana; Shunichi Takeda
Journal:  J Radiat Res       Date:  2013-12-22       Impact factor: 2.724

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.