Literature DB >> 23047363

Public reporting of PCI outcomes and quality of care: one step forward and new questions raised.

Mauro Moscucci.   

Abstract

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23047363     DOI: 10.1001/jama.2012.13389

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JAMA        ISSN: 0098-7484            Impact factor:   56.272


× No keyword cloud information.
  4 in total

Review 1.  Public reporting of PCI outcomes: for better or for worse.

Authors:  Brian J Potter; Robert W Yeh; Duane S Pinto
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 2.931

2.  Association between public reporting of outcomes with procedural management and mortality for patients with acute myocardial infarction.

Authors:  Stephen W Waldo; James M McCabe; Cashel O'Brien; Kevin F Kennedy; Karen E Joynt; Robert W Yeh
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2015-03-24       Impact factor: 24.094

3.  High-risk percutaneous coronary intervention in the era of public reporting: clinical and ethical considerations in the care of an elderly patient with critical left main disease and shock.

Authors:  Beau M Hawkins; Lisa M Fitzgerald-McKeon; Robert W Yeh
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2014-01-14       Impact factor: 29.690

4.  Collaborative quality improvement vs public reporting for percutaneous coronary intervention: A comparison of percutaneous coronary intervention in New York vs Michigan.

Authors:  Thomas F Boyden; Karen E Joynt; Lisa McCoy; Megan L Neely; Matthew A Cavender; Simon Dixon; Frederick A Masoudi; Eric Peterson; Sunil V Rao; Hitinder S Gurm
Journal:  Am Heart J       Date:  2015-09-16       Impact factor: 4.749

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.