| Literature DB >> 23046538 |
Lucy W Kivuti-Bitok1, Geoff McDonnell, Ganesh P Pokhariyal, Abdul V Roudsari.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Cervical cancer remains a devastating disease in Kenya accounting for more than 2000 deaths each year. Lack of information on cervical cancer prevention and management has been attributed to the apathy among women in seeking health interventions. Use of internet-based and mobile e-health tools could increase information access among cervical cancer patients. The objective of the study was; to establish the extent of use of mobile phones and internet by cervical cancer patients in accessing information related to cancer treatment and management.; find out the characteristics of patients associated with internet use and identify barriers faced by the patients in internet use. A cross sectional descriptive survey of 199 cervical patients visiting the two main referral hospitals in Kenya was done. A structured questionnaire was used to collect data.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2012 PMID: 23046538 PMCID: PMC3576333 DOI: 10.1186/1756-0500-5-559
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Res Notes ISSN: 1756-0500
Socio-demographic characteristics of clients with cancer of the cervix
| | | |
| 20-29 years | 9 | 4.5 |
| 30-39 years | 28 | 14.1 |
| 40-49 years | 84 | 42.2 |
| 50-59 years | 43 | 21.6 |
| 60-69 years | 19 | 9.6 |
| 70 + years | 10 | 5.0 |
| Not stated | 6 | 3.0 |
| | | |
| No formal education | 27 | 13.6 |
| Pre-primary | 16 | 8.0 |
| Lower primary | 25 | 12.6 |
| Upper primary | 81 | 40.7 |
| O-level | 36 | 18.1 |
| A-level | 5 | 2.5 |
| Diploma | 6 | 2.5 |
| Degree | 3 | 1.5 |
| Masters degree | 1 | 0.5 |
| | | |
| Single | 25 | 12.6 |
| Married | 152 | 76.4 |
| Separated | 9 | 4.5 |
| Divorced | 1 | .5 |
| Other | 12 | 6.0 |
| | | |
| House wife | 63 | 31.7 |
| Farmer | 61 | 30.7 |
| Business | 22 | 11.1 |
| Formal employment | 11 | 5.5 |
| Casual labor | 6 | 3.0 |
| Retired | 6 | 3.0 |
| Others | 30 | 15.1 |
Figure 1Level of Education of Cervical Cancer Clients.
Cited sources of information on Cervical Cancer
| Doctor | 185 | 93.0 |
| Nurse | 72 | 36.2 |
| Friend | 36 | 18.1 |
| Relatives | 24 | 12.1 |
| Radio | 63 | 31.7 |
| Television | 47 | 23.6 |
| Mobile phone | 5 | 2.5 |
| Billboard | 7 | 3.5 |
| Other source | 5 | 2.5 |
Use of mobile phones by cervical cancer clients
| | | |
| Participant did not state any use | 86 | 43.2 |
| Single use | 72 | 36.2 |
| At least 2 uses | 41 | 20.6 |
| | | |
| Booking appointment | 43 | 21.6 |
| Reminder alerts for medication | 59 | 29.7 |
| Health education messages | 63 | 31.7 |
| Other use | 4 | 2.0 |
Use of Internet by Cervical Cancer Clients and Reasons Given for Not Using Internet
| Use internet to get information on cancer | |
| Yes | 15 (7.5) |
| No | 184 (92.5) |
| Reasons for not using internet | |
| Don’t know how to use computers | 141 (70.9) |
| Lack access to a computer | 58 (29.2) |
| Lack money to use a computer | 29 (14.6) |
| Any other reason | 22 (11.1) |
Figure 2Use of mobile phone Technology as suggested by Cervical Cancer Clients.
Level of Income of Cervical Cancer Clients
| <10,000 | 9 (6.92) | 121 (93.08) | 130 (100) | 0.026 |
| 10,000 to 50,000 | 3 (13.64) | 19 (86.36) | 22 (100) | |
| 50,000 to 100000 | 1 (100) | 0 (0) | 1 (100) | |
| missing | 2 (4.35) | 44 (95.65) | 46 (100) | |