Simon Clematide1, Fabio Rinaldi. 1. Institute of Computational Linguistics, University of Zurich, Binzmühlestrasse 14, 8050 Zurich, Switzerland. simon.clematide@uzh.ch.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: One of the key pieces of information which biomedical text mining systems are expected to extract from the literature are interactions among different types of biomedical entities (proteins, genes, diseases, drugs, etc.). Several large resources of curated relations between biomedical entities are currently available, such as the Pharmacogenomics Knowledge Base (PharmGKB) or the Comparative Toxicogenomics Database (CTD).Biomedical text mining systems, and in particular those which deal with the extraction of relationships among entities, could make better use of the wealth of already curated material. RESULTS: We propose a simple and effective method based on logistic regression (also known as maximum entropy modeling) for an optimized ranking of relation candidates utilizing curated abstracts. Furthermore, we examine the effects and difficulties of using widely available metadata (i.e. MeSH terms and chemical substance index terms) for relation extraction. Cross-validation experiments result in an improvement of the ranking quality in terms of AUCiP/R by 39% (PharmGKB) and 116% (CTD) against a frequency-based baseline of 0.39 (PharmGKB) and 0.21 (CTD). For the TAP-10 metrics, we achieve an improvement of 53% (PharmGKB) and 134% (CTD) against the same baseline system (0.21 PharmGKB and 0.15 CTD). CONCLUSIONS: Our experiments with the PharmGKB and the CTD database show a strong positive effect for the ranking of relation candidates utilizing the vast amount of curated relations covered by currently available knowledge databases. The tasks of concept identification and candidate relation generation profit from the adaptation to previously curated material. This presents an effective and practical method suitable for conservative extension and re-validation of biomedical relations from texts that has been successfully used for curation experiments with the PharmGKB and CTD database.
BACKGROUND: One of the key pieces of information which biomedical text mining systems are expected to extract from the literature are interactions among different types of biomedical entities (proteins, genes, diseases, drugs, etc.). Several large resources of curated relations between biomedical entities are currently available, such as the Pharmacogenomics Knowledge Base (PharmGKB) or the Comparative Toxicogenomics Database (CTD).Biomedical text mining systems, and in particular those which deal with the extraction of relationships among entities, could make better use of the wealth of already curated material. RESULTS: We propose a simple and effective method based on logistic regression (also known as maximum entropy modeling) for an optimized ranking of relation candidates utilizing curated abstracts. Furthermore, we examine the effects and difficulties of using widely available metadata (i.e. MeSH terms and chemical substance index terms) for relation extraction. Cross-validation experiments result in an improvement of the ranking quality in terms of AUCiP/R by 39% (PharmGKB) and 116% (CTD) against a frequency-based baseline of 0.39 (PharmGKB) and 0.21 (CTD). For the TAP-10 metrics, we achieve an improvement of 53% (PharmGKB) and 134% (CTD) against the same baseline system (0.21 PharmGKB and 0.15 CTD). CONCLUSIONS: Our experiments with the PharmGKB and the CTD database show a strong positive effect for the ranking of relation candidates utilizing the vast amount of curated relations covered by currently available knowledge databases. The tasks of concept identification and candidate relation generation profit from the adaptation to previously curated material. This presents an effective and practical method suitable for conservative extension and re-validation of biomedical relations from texts that has been successfully used for curation experiments with the PharmGKB and CTD database.
Authors: Florian Leitner; Scott A Mardis; Martin Krallinger; Gianni Cesareni; Lynette A Hirschman; Alfonso Valencia Journal: IEEE/ACM Trans Comput Biol Bioinform Date: 2010 Jul-Sep Impact factor: 3.710
Authors: William A Baumgartner; K Bretonnel Cohen; Lynne M Fox; George Acquaah-Mensah; Lawrence Hunter Journal: Bioinformatics Date: 2007-07-01 Impact factor: 6.937
Authors: Allan Peter Davis; Benjamin L King; Susan Mockus; Cynthia G Murphy; Cynthia Saraceni-Richards; Michael Rosenstein; Thomas Wiegers; Carolyn J Mattingly Journal: Nucleic Acids Res Date: 2010-09-22 Impact factor: 16.971
Authors: Fabio Rinaldi; Simon Clematide; Yael Garten; Michelle Whirl-Carrillo; Li Gong; Joan M Hebert; Katrin Sangkuhl; Caroline F Thorn; Teri E Klein; Russ B Altman Journal: Database (Oxford) Date: 2012-04-23 Impact factor: 3.451
Authors: Andres Cañada; Salvador Capella-Gutierrez; Obdulia Rabal; Julen Oyarzabal; Alfonso Valencia; Martin Krallinger Journal: Nucleic Acids Res Date: 2017-07-03 Impact factor: 16.971