Literature DB >> 23046141

Set size and mask duration do not interact in object-substitution masking.

Ioannis Argyropoulos1, Angus Gellatly, Michael Pilling, Wakefield Carter.   

Abstract

Object-substitution masking (OSM) occurs when a mask, such as four dots that surround a brief target item, onsets simultaneously with the target and offsets a short time after the target, rather than simultaneously with it. OSM is a reduction in accuracy of reporting the target with the temporally trailing mask, compared with the simultaneously offsetting mask. It has been thought that OSM occurs only if attention cannot be rapidly focused, or prefocused, on the target location. One line of evidence for this is a reported interaction between target display set size and the duration of the trailing mask. We analyze the evidence for this interaction and suggest it occurs only as an artifact of data being compressed by a ceiling effect. We report six experiments that support this interpretation by showing that the interaction is always absent unless a ceiling effect is induced. We go on to analyze other evidence to support the notion that attention modulates OSM, and argue that in each case, the data either reflect a ceiling effect or can be explained in another way. Our data and our analyses of the existing literature have strong implications for how OSM should be conceptualized. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2013 APA, all rights reserved).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23046141     DOI: 10.1037/a0030240

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform        ISSN: 0096-1523            Impact factor:   3.332


  11 in total

1.  Contributions of parvocellular and magnocellular pathways to visual perception near the hands are not fixed, but can be dynamically altered.

Authors:  Stephanie C Goodhew; Ruby Clarke
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2016-02

2.  Object-substitution masking degrades the quality of conscious object representations.

Authors:  Geoffrey W Harrison; Jason Rajsic; Daryl E Wilson
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2016-02

3.  What was that object? On the role of identity information in the formation of object files and conscious object perception.

Authors:  Stephanie C Goodhew
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2019-05-25

Review 4.  Substituting objects from consciousness: a review of object substitution masking.

Authors:  Stephanie C Goodhew; Jay Pratt; Paul E Dux; Susanne Ferber
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2013-10

5.  No effect of spatial attention on the processing of a motion ensemble: Evidence from Posner cueing.

Authors:  Louisa A Talipski; Stephanie C Goodhew; Mark Edwards
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2021-11-22       Impact factor: 2.157

6.  The fastest saccadic responses escape visual masking.

Authors:  Sébastien M Crouzet; Morten Overgaard; Niko A Busch
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-02-05       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Reentrant processing mediates object substitution masking: comment on Põder (2013).

Authors:  Vincent Di Lollo
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2014-08-04

8.  The changing picture of object substitution masking: reply to Di Lollo (2014).

Authors:  Endel Põder
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2014-09-09

9.  Reconsidering Visual Search.

Authors:  Árni Kristjánsson
Journal:  Iperception       Date:  2015-11-08

10.  A closer look at four-dot masking of a foveated target.

Authors:  Marwan Daar; Hugh R Wilson
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2016-06-02       Impact factor: 2.984

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.