Literature DB >> 23045993

Two-step differentiation of mast cells from induced pluripotent stem cells.

Tomoko Yamaguchi1, Katsuhisa Tashiro, Satoshi Tanaka, Sumie Katayama, Waka Ishida, Ken Fukuda, Atsuki Fukushima, Ryoko Araki, Masumi Abe, Hiroyuki Mizuguchi, Kenji Kawabata.   

Abstract

Mast cells play important roles in the pathogenesis of allergic diseases. They are generally classified into 2 phenotypically distinct populations: connective tissue-type mast cells (CTMCs) and mucosal-type mast cells (MMCs). The number of mast cells that can be obtained from tissues is limited, making it difficult to study the function of mast cells. Here, we report the generation and characterization of CTMC-like mast cells derived from mouse induced pluripotent stem (iPS) cells. iPS cell-derived mast cells (iPSMCs) were generated by the OP9 coculture method or embryoid body formation method. The number of Safranin O-positive cells, expression levels of CD81 protein and histidine decarboxylase mRNA, and protease activities were elevated in the iPSMCs differentiated by both methods as compared with those in bone marrow-derived mast cells (BMMCs). Electron microscopic analysis revealed that iPSMCs contained more granules than BMMCs. Degranulation was induced in iPSMCs after stimulation with cationic secretagogues or vancomycin. In addition, iPSMCs had the ability to respond to stimulation with the IgE/antigen complex in vitro and in vivo. Moreover, when iPSMCs generated on OP9 cells were cocultured with Swiss 3T3 fibroblasts, protease activities as maturation index were more elevated, demonstrating that mature mast cells were differentiated from iPS cells. iPSMCs can be used as an in vitro model of CTMCs to investigate their functions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23045993     DOI: 10.1089/scd.2012.0339

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stem Cells Dev        ISSN: 1547-3287            Impact factor:   3.272


  5 in total

Review 1.  Advances in cellular technology in the hematology field: What have we learned so far?

Authors:  Gustavo Torres de Souza; Claudinéia Pereira Maranduba; Camila Maurmann de Souza; Danielle Luciana Aurora Soares do Amaral; Francisco Carlos da Guia; Rafaella de Souza Salomão Zanette; João Vitor Paes Rettore; Natana Chaves Rabelo; Lucas Mendes Nascimento; Ícaro França Navarro Pinto; Júlia Boechat Farani; Abrahão Elias Hallack Neto; Fernando de Sá Silva; Carlos Magno da Costa Maranduba; Angelo Atalla
Journal:  World J Stem Cells       Date:  2015-01-26       Impact factor: 5.326

2.  MHC-matched induced pluripotent stem cells can attenuate cellular and humoral immune responses but are still susceptible to innate immunity in pigs.

Authors:  Yoshihisa Mizukami; Tomoyuki Abe; Hiroaki Shibata; Yukitoshi Makimura; Shuh-hei Fujishiro; Kimihide Yanase; Shuji Hishikawa; Eiji Kobayashi; Yutaka Hanazono
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-06-13       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Wnt-β-Catenin Signaling Promotes the Maturation of Mast Cells.

Authors:  Tomoko Yamaguchi; Misae Nishijima; Katsuhisa Tashiro; Kenji Kawabata
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2016-10-23       Impact factor: 3.411

4.  Rapid Mast Cell Generation from Gata2 Reporter Pluripotent Stem Cells.

Authors:  Mari-Liis Kauts; Bianca De Leo; Carmen Rodríguez-Seoane; Roger Ronn; Fokion Glykofrydis; Antonio Maglitto; Polynikis Kaimakis; Margarita Basi; Helen Taylor; Lesley Forrester; Adam C Wilkinson; Berthold Göttgens; Philippa Saunders; Elaine Dzierzak
Journal:  Stem Cell Reports       Date:  2018-09-06       Impact factor: 7.765

Review 5.  Recent Advances in Developmental Hematopoiesis: Diving Deeper With New Technologies.

Authors:  Bart Weijts; Laurent Yvernogeau; Catherine Robin
Journal:  Front Immunol       Date:  2021-11-24       Impact factor: 7.561

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.