Literature DB >> 23044802

A novel class of tRNA-derived small RNAs extremely enriched in mature mouse sperm.

Hongying Peng, Junchao Shi, Ying Zhang, He Zhang, Shangying Liao, Wei Li, Li Lei, Chunsheng Han, Lina Ning, Yujing Cao, Qi Zhou, Qi Chen, Enkui Duan.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23044802      PMCID: PMC3494397          DOI: 10.1038/cr.2012.141

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cell Res        ISSN: 1001-0602            Impact factor:   25.617


× No keyword cloud information.

Dear editor,

The discovery of sperm-borne RNAs (mRNAs and small non-coding RNAs) has opened the possibility of additional paternal contributions aside from providing the DNA[1]. It has been reported that the incoming sperm can provide information for its host egg cytoplasm, which functionally influences the order of cell division[2], possibly via delivering RNAs. Indeed, the sperm-borne miRNA and mRNA have been demonstrated as active players in early embryo development[3] and transgenerational epigenetic inheritance[4]. However, given the diversity of small RNA classes (miRNA, endo-siRNA, piRNA, etc.) generated during spermatogenesis, the contents and profiles of the small RNA population carried by mature sperm remain undefined. In the present study, we isolated mature sperm from the cauda epididymis of adult male mice (Supplementary information, Data S1). The purity of sperm was > 99% as evaluated by microscopy and was confirmed by RT-PCR analyses of different biomarkers (Supplementary information, Figure S1A and S1B). The RNA extracted from mature sperm, adult testis, and uterus were processed for small RNA (< 40 nt) deep sequencing (Supplementary information, Figure S1C, S1D, S1E and Data S1). The total small RNA reads and genome-mapping statistic data (Supplementary information, Table S1) showed an abundance of small RNAs carried by mature sperm. The overall length distribution of small RNAs (Figure 1A) revealed that the dominant reads from mature sperm were at 29-34 nt, slightly different from adult testis (26-32 nt), and distinct from uterus (21-23 nt). The majority of the 26-32 nt small RNAs in mouse testis are piwi-interacting RNAs (piRNAs), which are actively involved in retrotransposon silencing that protects the integrity of the genome[5]. As it was initially suggested that piRNAs are absent in the cauda epididymis[6] and that mammalian PIWI proteins (MILI, MIWI, MIWI2) are not expressed in mature sperm[5], the abundant existence of 29-34 nt small RNAs in the mature sperm is somewhat surprising to us and suggests that they might be different from the well-known piRNA population from testis. Further analysis has revealed a distinct signature for these mature-sperm-enriched small RNAs, which represent a novel class of abundantly expressed small RNAs that can be grouped into distinct families. The small RNAs within each family showed identical 5′ sequences and only differed at their distal 3′ ends (Figure 1B and Supplementary information, Figure S2), suggesting that they are derived from the same precursor sequence. Particularly, two of these small RNA families were extremely enriched, which comprised 38.19% (family-1) and 19.14% (family-2) of all small RNA reads, respectively (Figure 1B), and together they accounted for the majority of the 30-34 nt small RNA population (Figure 1C).
Figure 1

Identification and characterization of tRNA-derived small RNAs in mature mouse sperm. (A) Length distributions of small RNAs in uterus, testis and mature sperm. (B) Alignments and statistics of small RNA family-1 and -2 in mature sperm, testis and uterus; the top three enriched RNAs for each family were highlighted. (C) Small RNA family-1 and -2 comprised the majority of 30-34 nt small RNA population. (D) Chromosome locations of small RNA family-1 and -2. (E, F) Illustrations showing that mse-tsRNA family-1 (E) and mse-tsRNA family-2 (F) are derived from 5′ halves of tRNAGlu and tRNAGly respectively; top three cleavage sites for each tRNA were marked by arrow heads. (G) Catalogue of small RNA populations in mature mouse sperm. (H) RT-PCR analyses of mse-tsRNA family-1, -2 and miR-34c in purified spermatogenic cells and mature sperm, followed by product sequencing. The variable nucleotides were marked by shade. Samples for RT-PCR were equally loaded by calibration of RNA concentration. Similar results were obtained in 3 independent experiments. (I, J) Percentages of mse-tsRNA family-1 (I) and -2 (J) reads from deep-sequencing datasets of purified spermatogenic cells and mature sperm. (K) Representative photos of intact sperm and purified sperm heads. (L) RT-PCR analyses of mse-tsRNA family-1, -2 and miR-34c in intact sperm and purified sperm heads. (M) Evolutionary tree showing that the tRNA precursors of mse-tsRNA family-1 and -2 are highly conserved in vertebrate species. (N) RT-PCR analyses of mse-tsRNA family-1 and -2 in mature sperm from mouse, rat and human.

To further characterize these mature-sperm-enriched small RNAs, we performed BLAT searches for the top two abundant families against the mouse genomic databases (mm9). As shown in Figure 1D, these small RNAs are located at multiple sites on the genome, with several clusters on chromosomes 1, 8 and 13. Most strikingly, each of these genomic locations corresponds to a tRNA locus (Figure 1D). By further comparing with the genomic tRNA database, we found that each of these small RNA families unanimously matches to the 5′ half of a specific tRNA, with cleavage sites located preferentially at the anticodon loop (30-34 nt from the 5′ end), as illustrated for families 1-2 (Figure 1E and 1F) and for families 3-7 (Supplementary information, Figure S2). Their ultra-high enrichment (Figure 1G) and the preferential cleavage sites and length distributions strongly suggested that these small RNAs are not generated randomly by tRNA degradation, but under strict cleavage regulations. As these small RNAs are highly enriched in mature sperm and are derived from tRNAs, we termed them “mature-sperm-enriched tRNA-derived small RNAs” (mse-tsRNAs). Indeed, recent evidence has demonstrated that tRNA-derived RNA fragments are biologically functional[7], and their production could be induced under various stress conditions (physical or chemical stress) by specific RNase[8]. The mature sperm is produced from testicular spermatogenesis followed by maturation during passage through the epididymis. The physiological condition and specific enzyme governing mse-tsRNAs production and accumulation in mature sperm are currently unknown. To monitor the biogenesis of mse-tsRNAs during sperm formation, we next analyzed purified mouse testicular spermatogenic cells (type A spermatogonia, pachytene spermatocytes, round spermatids and elongated spermatids) and mature sperm. We found that the levels of mse-tsRNA family-1 and -2 were relatively constant during the early stages of spermatogenesis, and were substantially increased at late- (family-1) or post-spermatogenesis (family-2) (Figure 1H). The RT-PCR results were further confirmed by analyzing small RNA deep-sequencing data obtained from purified mouse testicular spermatogenic cells[9] and mature sperm (Figure 1I and 1J). By analyzing the PCR product size followed by product sequencing, we could find both mse-tsRNAs and their tRNA precursors, supporting the hypothesis that the mse-tsRNAs are derived from tRNA cleavage (Figure 1H). Interestingly, we consistently observed a sequence (52 nt) in mse-tsRNA family-2 PCR products, which is shorter than the expected length of intact tRNA and mapped to its 5′ portion (Figure 1H), suggesting the involvement of a two-step cleavage of tRNA in generating mse-tsRNA family-2. The increase of mse-tsRNA family-1 and -2 seems not to correlate with the expression of mammalian PIWI proteins (MILI, MIWI, MIWI2)[5], suggesting that they might not be closely related to the piRNAs, and their ultra-high enrichment in mature sperm might be due to specific tRNA cleavage and/or selective accumulation of cleavage products at late- or post-spermatogenesis (such as during epididymal transition). The underlying mechanisms are currently unknown. We also analyzed the relative expression of miR-34c by RT-PCR as a quality control, as its expression in spermatogenic cells and mature sperm have been previously reported[3,10]. As shown in Figure 1H, our results were consistent with previous reports that miR-34c was almost absent in spermatogonia, but was highly expressed from pachytene spermatocytes and continued to be highly expressed in spermatids[10] and mature sperm[3]. Note that miR-34c expression in mature sperm is much less than that of mse-tsRNA family-1 and -2, as shown by the RT-PCR results and by the reads number from our miRNA profiling database (Supplementary information, Figure S3). It is important to determine whether the sperm-borne mse-tsRNAs are located in sperm head, which could indicate their potential delivery into oocytes at fertilization. Using established methods to isolate purified sperm heads, we demonstrated that mse-tsRNAs are abundantly localized in the purified sperm head (Figure 1K and 1L), suggesting that they could be delivered into oocytes at fertilization. We next analyzed the expression levels of mse-tsRNA family-1 in oocytes, zygotes and parthenogenetically activated oocytes. Surprisingly, quantitative RT-PCR analysis revealed that the level of mse-tsRNA family-1 in zygotes is significantly lower than that in the oocytes and parthenogenetically activated oocytes (Supplementary information, Figure S4). These results might suggest a fertilization-triggered usage/consumption of mse-tsRNAs, which may reflect a functional role for mse-tsRNAs in early embryo events. As the mse-tsRNAs are derived from their tRNA templates, their sequence conservation could simply reflect the evolutionary conservation of their tRNA precursors. As shown in the evolutionary conservation analysis (Figure 1M and Supplementary information, Table S2), the tRNAs generating mse-tsRNA families 1-7 are highly conserved in vertebrate species, from fish to mammals, but absent from the worms, flies and plants. Indeed, besides our reported data for mouse sperm, existing small RNA datasets have shown that the mse-tsRNA family-1 is among the most highly expressed small RNA sequences in zebra fish testis (NCBI GEO Datasets: GSM830247)[11] and human sperm (NCBI GEO Datasets: GSM530235)[12], supporting the spermatozoal expression of mse-tsRNAs in a wide range of species. The expression of mse-tsRNA family-1 and -2 in mature sperm from mouse, rat and human were further analyzed using RT-PCR and confirmed by product sequencing (Figure 1N). These results suggest that mse-tsRNAs might serve as an ancient paternal element with evolutionarily conserved functions. Taken together, the present study revealed a previously hidden layer of sperm-borne small RNAs, identifying a novel class of tRNA-derived mse-tsRNAs with ultra-high accumulation in mature sperm. The biogenesis and function of these mse-tsRNAs are interesting topics that warrant future investigations.
  12 in total

Review 1.  Paternal contribution: new insights and future challenges.

Authors:  Stephen A Krawetz
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 53.242

2.  A novel class of small RNAs in mouse spermatogenic cells.

Authors:  Shane T Grivna; Ergin Beyret; Zhong Wang; Haifan Lin
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  2006-06-09       Impact factor: 11.361

3.  RNA-mediated non-mendelian inheritance of an epigenetic change in the mouse.

Authors:  Minoo Rassoulzadegan; Valérie Grandjean; Pierre Gounon; Stéphane Vincent; Isabelle Gillot; François Cuzin
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2006-05-25       Impact factor: 49.962

4.  A novel class of small RNAs: tRNA-derived RNA fragments (tRFs).

Authors:  Yong Sun Lee; Yoshiyuki Shibata; Ankit Malhotra; Anindya Dutta
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  2009-11-15       Impact factor: 11.361

5.  piRNA profiling during specific stages of mouse spermatogenesis.

Authors:  Haiyun Gan; Xiwen Lin; Zhuqiang Zhang; Wei Zhang; Shangying Liao; Lixian Wang; Chunsheng Han
Journal:  RNA       Date:  2011-05-20       Impact factor: 4.942

6.  A survey of small RNAs in human sperm.

Authors:  Stephen A Krawetz; Adele Kruger; Claudia Lalancette; Rebecca Tagett; Ester Anton; Sorin Draghici; Michael P Diamond
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2011-10-11       Impact factor: 6.918

7.  Role for sperm in spatial patterning of the early mouse embryo.

Authors:  K Piotrowska; M Zernicka-Goetz
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2001-01-25       Impact factor: 49.962

8.  Hen1 is required for oocyte development and piRNA stability in zebrafish.

Authors:  Leonie M Kamminga; Maartje J Luteijn; Marjo J den Broeder; Stefan Redl; Lucas J T Kaaij; Elke F Roovers; Peter Ladurner; Eugene Berezikov; René F Ketting
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  2010-09-21       Impact factor: 11.598

Review 9.  The biogenesis and function of PIWI proteins and piRNAs: progress and prospect.

Authors:  Travis Thomson; Haifan Lin
Journal:  Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 13.827

10.  MicroRNA-34c enhances murine male germ cell apoptosis through targeting ATF1.

Authors:  Xiaoxuan Liang; Doudou Zhou; Chao Wei; Haoshu Luo; Jiali Liu; Rui Fu; Sheng Cui
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-03-30       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  131 in total

1.  Sperm-borne miRNAs and endo-siRNAs are important for fertilization and preimplantation embryonic development.

Authors:  Shuiqiao Yuan; Andrew Schuster; Chong Tang; Tian Yu; Nicole Ortogero; Jianqiang Bao; Huili Zheng; Wei Yan
Journal:  Development       Date:  2015-12-30       Impact factor: 6.868

2.  Experimental evidence needed to demonstrate inter- and trans-generational effects of ancestral experiences in mammals.

Authors:  Brian G Dias; Kerry J Ressler
Journal:  Bioessays       Date:  2014-08-25       Impact factor: 4.345

3.  Human tRNA-Derived Small RNAs Modulate Host-Oral Microbial Interactions.

Authors:  X He; F Li; B Bor; K Koyano; L Cen; X Xiao; W Shi; D T W Wong
Journal:  J Dent Res       Date:  2018-04-27       Impact factor: 6.116

4.  microRNA profiling in three main stages during porcine spermatogenesis.

Authors:  Zonggang Luo; Yingkai Liu; Lei Chen; Michael Ellis; Mingzhou Li; Jinyong Wang; Yi Zhang; Penghui Fu; Ketian Wang; Xuewei Li; Ling Wang
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2015-01-07       Impact factor: 3.412

Review 5.  The sperm factor: paternal impact beyond genes.

Authors:  Simone Immler
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2018-06-29       Impact factor: 3.821

Review 6.  Mechanisms and consequences of subcellular RNA localization across diverse cell types.

Authors:  Krysta L Engel; Ankita Arora; Raeann Goering; Hei-Yong G Lo; J Matthew Taliaferro
Journal:  Traffic       Date:  2020-04-29       Impact factor: 6.215

7.  Transfer RNA as a source of small functional RNA.

Authors:  Megumi Shigematsu; Shozo Honda; Yohei Kirino
Journal:  J Mol Biol Mol Imaging       Date:  2014

8.  Alterations in sperm-inherited noncoding RNAs associate with late-term fetal growth restriction induced by preconception paternal alcohol use.

Authors:  Yudhishtar Bedi; Richard C Chang; Rachel Gibbs; Tracy M Clement; Michael C Golding
Journal:  Reprod Toxicol       Date:  2019-04-30       Impact factor: 3.143

Review 9.  Epigenetic inheritance of acquired traits through sperm RNAs and sperm RNA modifications.

Authors:  Qi Chen; Wei Yan; Enkui Duan
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2016-10-03       Impact factor: 53.242

10.  Respiratory Syncytial Virus Utilizes a tRNA Fragment to Suppress Antiviral Responses Through a Novel Targeting Mechanism.

Authors:  Junfang Deng; Ryan N Ptashkin; Yu Chen; Zhi Cheng; Guangliang Liu; Thien Phan; Xiaoling Deng; Jiehua Zhou; Inhan Lee; Yong Sun Lee; Xiaoyong Bao
Journal:  Mol Ther       Date:  2015-07-09       Impact factor: 11.454

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.