Literature DB >> 2304405

Differential responses to proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation (PNF) stretch techniques.

L R Osternig1, R N Robertson, R K Troxel, P Hansen.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to investigate the effects of sustained stretch and two common proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation (PNF) stretch techniques on hamstring muscle activation and knee extension range of motion (ROM) in different athletic populations. Three stretch techniques: stretch-relax (SR), contract-relax (CR), and agonist contract-relax (ACR) were applied to 10 endurance athletes (EN), 10 high intensity athletes (HI), and 10 control subjects (C). The results revealed that ACR produced 89-110% greater hamstring EMG activity (P less than 0.05) and 9-13% more knee joint ROM than CR and SR, respectively. This same pattern was evident for the individual subject groups. Comparisons of mean data among the three subject groups revealed that the EN athletes generated 58-113% more hamstring EMG activity (P less than 0.05) than the HI and C groups, respectively, across all stretch conditions, whereas the EN group attained significantly less ROM than the HI and C groups for CR and ACR conditions. It was postulated that high intensity-short term activity training necessitates less hamstring resistance to knee extension than long term endurance training. The findings suggest that decreases in muscle activity may not be strongly related to increases in joint range of motion and that factors other than muscle relaxation are important in achieving increased ROM. Also, the differential effects of various stretch techniques between dissimilar athletic populations should be considered if stretch-induced injury is to be avoided.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2304405

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc        ISSN: 0195-9131            Impact factor:   5.411


  13 in total

1.  Duration of Maintained Hamstring Flexibility After a One-Time, Modified Hold-Relax Stretching Protocol.

Authors:  Scott G. Spernoga; Timothy L. Uhl; Brent L. Arnold; Bruce M. Gansneder
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 2.860

2.  Current concepts in muscle stretching for exercise and rehabilitation.

Authors:  Phil Page
Journal:  Int J Sports Phys Ther       Date:  2012-02

Review 3.  Proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation stretching : mechanisms and clinical implications.

Authors:  Melanie J Sharman; Andrew G Cresswell; Stephan Riek
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 11.136

4.  Influence of a low-level contractile response from the soleus, gastrocnemius and tibialis anterior muscles on viscoelastic stress-relaxation of aged human calf muscle-tendon units.

Authors:  Richard L Gajdosik
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2005-11-22       Impact factor: 3.078

5.  Proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation techniques in sports medicine: a reassessment.

Authors:  P R Surburg; J W Schrader
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  1997-01       Impact factor: 2.860

Review 6.  The effects of strength training and disuse on the mechanisms of fatigue.

Authors:  D G Behm; D M St-Pierre
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  1998-03       Impact factor: 11.136

Review 7.  Velocity specificity of resistance training.

Authors:  D G Behm; D G Sale
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  1993-06       Impact factor: 11.136

8.  Acute effects of contract-relax (CR) stretch versus a modified CR technique.

Authors:  Anthony D Kay; Steven Dods; Anthony J Blazevich
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2016-01-04       Impact factor: 3.078

9.  Effects of prior concentric training on eccentric exercise induced muscle damage.

Authors:  N Gleeson; R Eston; V Marginson; M McHugh
Journal:  Br J Sports Med       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 13.800

10.  Hypertrophy without increased isometric strength after weight training.

Authors:  D G Sale; J E Martin; D E Moroz
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol       Date:  1992
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.