Literature DB >> 23044008

Outcomes and feasibility of laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy among obese versus non-obese women.

Thibault Thubert1, Alix Naveau, Arnaud Letohic, Vincent Villefranque, Jean Louis Benifla, Xavier Deffieux.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To compare complication rates and short-term outcomes of laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy among obese and non-obese women.
METHODS: A retrospective multicenter study of 39 obese women and 111 non-obese women was conducted. Obesity was defined as a body mass index (BMI, calculated as weight in kilograms divided by the square of height in meters) above 30. Operative parameters (length of operation, associated procedures, complication rate, and length of hospitalization) and short-term (2 months) objective and subjective results were evaluated.
RESULTS: The median BMI in the obese group was 30.5 (interquartile range [IQR] 30-32) versus 23 (IQR 21-25) in the non-obese group (P<0.0001). Short-term anatomic results (postoperative stage of prolapse) were comparable in the obese and non-obese groups: stage 0-1, 87.1% versus 91.6% (P=0.60); stage 2, 10.2% versus 5.5% (P=0.60); stage 3-4, 2.5% versus 2.5% (P=0.60). Complication rates were also similar in the obese and non-obese groups: bladder injury, 2.5% versus 5.4% (P=0.77); laparoconversion, 5.1% versus 4.5% (P=0.77). Rates of reoperation (excluding women with de novo urinary stress incontinence) were 12.8% in the obese group and 8.1% in the non-obese group (P=0.58).
CONCLUSION: Laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy has similar complication rates and short-term outcomes among both obese and non-obese women.
Copyright © 2012 International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics. Published by Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23044008     DOI: 10.1016/j.ijgo.2012.07.020

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Gynaecol Obstet        ISSN: 0020-7292            Impact factor:   3.561


  5 in total

1.  Effect of BMI on clinical outcomes following minimally invasive sacrocolpopexy.

Authors:  Radhika Patnam; Katherine Husk; Abhishek Sripad; Kathryn Barletta; Alexis Dieter; Elizabeth J Geller
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2020-04-16

2.  Factors associated with intraoperative conversion during robotic sacrocolpopexy.

Authors:  Brian J Linder; George K Chow; Lindsay L Hertzig; Marisa Clifton; Daniel S Elliott
Journal:  Int Braz J Urol       Date:  2015 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 1.541

3.  Nerve preserving vs standard laparoscopic sacropexy: Postoperative bowel function.

Authors:  Stefano Cosma; Paolo Petruzzelli; Saverio Danese; Chiara Benedetto
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2017-05-16

4.  Laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy posthysterectomy: intraoperative feasibility and safety in obese women compared with women of normal weight.

Authors:  Charlotte Mahoney; Georgina Scott; Lucy Dwyer; Fiona Reid; Karen Ward; Anthony Smith; Rohna Kearney
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2019-02-27       Impact factor: 2.894

Review 5.  Obesity and Pelvic Floor Disorders: A Review of the Literature.

Authors:  Andrzej Pomian; Wojciech Lisik; Maciej Kosieradzki; Ewa Barcz
Journal:  Med Sci Monit       Date:  2016-06-03
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.