Literature DB >> 23043676

Evaluation of maxillary sinus width on cone-beam computed tomography for sinus augmentation and new sinus classification based on sinus width.

Hsun-Liang Chan1, Fernando Suarez, Alberto Monje, Erika Benavides, Hom-Lay Wang.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The degree of difficulty in performing lateral window sinus augmentation may depend on the morphology of the maxillary sinus. The aim of this was to measure the distances between the medial and lateral sinus wall (sinus width [SW]) at different levels and apply those SW values to formulate a new sinus classification.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Edentulous sites adjacent to maxillary sinuses with inadequate ridge height (RH; <10 mm) were included from cone-beam computed tomography database in the University of Michigan. SW was measured at the heights of 5, 7, 10, 13, and 15 mm from alveolar crest at the edentulous sites. Mean SW was stratified by residual RH into three different groups (group 1: <4 mm, group 2: ≥4 and <7, and group 3: ≥7 and <10), study sites (first and second premolars and molars), and measurement levels.
RESULTS: Three hundred and twenty subjects (mean 50.1 years old) with 422 edentulous sites were included. Mean SW was wider at molar sites, higher measurement levels, and sites with shorter residual RH. Mean SW at the lower (average 2.3 mm from sinus floor) and higher boundary (15 mm from the alveolar crest) of lateral window osteotomy was 9.0 (2.8) and 16.0 (4.4) mm, respectively. Narrow, average, or wide sinuses were classified when the SW was <8, 8-10 and >10 mm at the lower boundary or <14, 14-17 and >17 mm at the upper boundary, respectively.
CONCLUSION: SW at levels that were relevant to lateral window sinus augmentation was measured. The proposed sinus classification could facilitate communication between health providers and determine the degree of easiness of sinus augmentation. It might be particularly useful for the selection of grafting materials and surgical approaches. Further studies are required to test its clinical implications.
© 2012 John Wiley & Sons A/S.

Entities:  

Keywords:  alveolar ridge augmentation; maxillary sinus size and dental implants; maxillary sinus/surgery; surgical complications

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23043676     DOI: 10.1111/clr.12055

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Oral Implants Res        ISSN: 0905-7161            Impact factor:   5.977


  14 in total

1.  The effect of anatomy on osteogenesis after maxillary sinus floor augmentation: a radiographic and histological analysis.

Authors:  Wenjie Zhou; Feng Wang; Marko Magic; Minjie Zhuang; Jian Sun; Yiqun Wu
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2021-02-11       Impact factor: 3.573

2.  Histomorphometric evaluation of different graft associations for maxillary sinus elevation in wide antral cavities: a randomized controlled clinical trial.

Authors:  Mauricio Marcelo Harlos; Thiago Bezerra da Silva; Pedro Giorgetti Montagner; Lucas Novaes Teixeira; Adriana Vanderley Gomes; Elizabeth Ferreira Martinez
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2022-05-05       Impact factor: 3.606

3.  Comparison of the performances of low-crystalline carbonate apatite and Bio-Oss in sinus augmentation using three-dimensional image analysis.

Authors:  Koudai Nagata; Kei Fuchigami; Ryoji Kitami; Yurie Okuhama; Kana Wakamori; Hirokazu Sumitomo; Hyunjin Kim; Manabu Okubo; Hiromasa Kawana
Journal:  Int J Implant Dent       Date:  2021-03-23

Review 4.  Open Sinus Lift Surgery and the Importance of Preoperative Cone-Beam Computed Tomography Scan: A Review.

Authors:  Amin Rahpeyma; Saeedeh Khajehahmadi
Journal:  J Int Oral Health       Date:  2015-09

5.  Morphometric analysis of sinus depth in the posterior maxilla and proposal of a novel classification.

Authors:  Florian Wagner; Gabriella Dvorak; Stefan Nemec; Peter Pietschmann; Hannes Traxler; Kurt Schicho; Rudolf Seemann
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-03-24       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  Study of factors influencing preoperative detection of alveolar antral artery by CBCT in sinus floor elevation.

Authors:  Pablo Varela-Centelles; María Loira; Antonio González-Mosquera; Amparo Romero-Mendez; Juan Seoane; María José García-Pola; Juan M Seoane-Romero
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-07-02       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  A radiographic evaluation of graft height changes after maxillary sinus augmentation.

Authors:  Do-Hyung Kim; Min-Jeong Ko; Jae-Hong Lee; Seoung-Nyum Jeong
Journal:  J Periodontal Implant Sci       Date:  2018-06-28       Impact factor: 2.614

8.  Morphological Analysis of the Human Maxillary Sinus Using Three-Dimensional Printing.

Authors:  Nadia Araneda; Marcelo Parra; Wilfredo A González-Arriagada; Mariano Del Sol; Ziyad S Haidar; Sergio Olate
Journal:  Contemp Clin Dent       Date:  2019 Apr-Jun

Review 9.  The maxillary sinus: physiology, development and imaging anatomy.

Authors:  Andrew Whyte; Rudolf Boeddinghaus
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2019-08-13       Impact factor: 2.419

Review 10.  What is the frequency of anatomical variations and pathological findings in maxillary sinuses among patients subjected to maxillofacial cone beam computed tomography? A systematic review.

Authors:  J Ata-Ali; J-V Diago-Vilalta; M Melo; L Bagán; M-C Soldini; C Di-Nardo; F Ata-Ali; J-F Mañes-Ferrer
Journal:  Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal       Date:  2017-07-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.