Literature DB >> 23041298

Broad ranges of affinity and specificity of anti-histone antibodies revealed by a quantitative peptide immunoprecipitation assay.

Shingo Nishikori1, Takamitsu Hattori, Stephen M Fuchs, Norihisa Yasui, John Wojcik, Akiko Koide, Brian D Strahl, Shohei Koide.   

Abstract

Antibodies directed against histone posttranslational modifications (PTMs) are critical tools in epigenetics research, particularly in the widely used chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP) experiments. However, a lack of quantitative methods for characterizing such antibodies has been a major bottleneck in accurate and reproducible analysis of histone modifications. Here, we report a simple and sensitive method for quantitatively characterizing polyclonal and monoclonal antibodies for histone PTMs in a ChIP-like format. Importantly, it determines the apparent dissociation constants for the interactions of an antibody with peptides harboring cognate or off-target PTMs. Analyses of commercial antibodies revealed large ranges of affinity, specificity and binding capacity as well as substantial lot-to-lot variations, suggesting the importance of quantitatively characterizing each antibody intended to be used in ChIP experiments and optimizing experimental conditions accordingly. Furthermore, using this method, we identified additional factors potentially affecting the interpretation of ChIP experiments.
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23041298      PMCID: PMC3502729          DOI: 10.1016/j.jmb.2012.09.022

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Mol Biol        ISSN: 0022-2836            Impact factor:   5.469


  11 in total

1.  Antibody recognition of histone post-translational modifications: emerging issues and future prospects.

Authors:  Stephen M Fuchs; Brian D Strahl
Journal:  Epigenomics       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 4.778

2.  Quantitative assessment of chromatin immunoprecipitation grade antibodies directed against histone modifications reveals patterns of co-occurring marks on histone protein molecules.

Authors:  Sally E Peach; Emily L Rudomin; Namrata D Udeshi; Steven A Carr; Jacob D Jaffe
Journal:  Mol Cell Proteomics       Date:  2012-03-21       Impact factor: 5.911

Review 3.  Chromatin modifications and their function.

Authors:  Tony Kouzarides
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2007-02-23       Impact factor: 41.582

4.  Isolating and engineering human antibodies using yeast surface display.

Authors:  Ginger Chao; Wai L Lau; Benjamin J Hackel; Stephen L Sazinsky; Shaun M Lippow; K Dane Wittrup
Journal:  Nat Protoc       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 13.491

Review 5.  The complex language of chromatin regulation during transcription.

Authors:  Shelley L Berger
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2007-05-24       Impact factor: 49.962

6.  Analysis of epigenetic modifications of chromatin at specific gene loci by native chromatin immunoprecipitation of nucleosomes isolated using hydroxyapatite chromatography.

Authors:  Marjorie Brand; Shravanti Rampalli; Chandra-Prakash Chaturvedi; F Jeffrey Dilworth
Journal:  Nat Protoc       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 13.491

7.  A SPOT on the chromatin landscape? Histone peptide arrays as a tool for epigenetic research.

Authors:  Nataliya Nady; Jinrong Min; Michael S Kareta; Frédéric Chédin; Cheryl H Arrowsmith
Journal:  Trends Biochem Sci       Date:  2008-06-04       Impact factor: 13.807

8.  Influence of combinatorial histone modifications on antibody and effector protein recognition.

Authors:  Stephen M Fuchs; Krzysztof Krajewski; Richard W Baker; Victoria L Miller; Brian D Strahl
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2010-12-17       Impact factor: 10.834

9.  Use of flow cytometric methods to quantify protein-protein interactions.

Authors:  Levi L Blazer; David L Roman; Molly R Muxlow; Richard R Neubig
Journal:  Curr Protoc Cytom       Date:  2010-01

10.  An assessment of histone-modification antibody quality.

Authors:  Thea A Egelhofer; Aki Minoda; Sarit Klugman; Kyungjoon Lee; Paulina Kolasinska-Zwierz; Artyom A Alekseyenko; Ming-Sin Cheung; Daniel S Day; Sarah Gadel; Andrey A Gorchakov; Tingting Gu; Peter V Kharchenko; Samantha Kuan; Isabel Latorre; Daniela Linder-Basso; Ying Luu; Queminh Ngo; Marc Perry; Andreas Rechtsteiner; Nicole C Riddle; Yuri B Schwartz; Gregory A Shanower; Anne Vielle; Julie Ahringer; Sarah C R Elgin; Mitzi I Kuroda; Vincenzo Pirrotta; Bing Ren; Susan Strome; Peter J Park; Gary H Karpen; R David Hawkins; Jason D Lieb
Journal:  Nat Struct Mol Biol       Date:  2010-12-05       Impact factor: 15.369

View more
  34 in total

1.  Antigen clasping by two antigen-binding sites of an exceptionally specific antibody for histone methylation.

Authors:  Takamitsu Hattori; Darson Lai; Irina S Dementieva; Sherwin P Montaño; Kohei Kurosawa; Yupeng Zheng; Louesa R Akin; Kalina M Świst-Rosowska; Adrian T Grzybowski; Akiko Koide; Krzysztof Krajewski; Brian D Strahl; Neil L Kelleher; Alexander J Ruthenburg; Shohei Koide
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2016-02-09       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Emerging Chemistry Strategies for Engineering Native Chromatin.

Authors:  Yael David; Tom W Muir
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2017-06-27       Impact factor: 15.419

3.  Calibrating ChIP-Seq with Nucleosomal Internal Standards to Measure Histone Modification Density Genome Wide.

Authors:  Adrian T Grzybowski; Zhonglei Chen; Alexander J Ruthenburg
Journal:  Mol Cell       Date:  2015-05-21       Impact factor: 17.970

4.  Engineered Reader Proteins for Enhanced Detection of Methylated Lysine on Histones.

Authors:  Katherine I Albanese; Mackenzie W Krone; Christopher J Petell; Madison M Parker; Brian D Strahl; Eric M Brustad; Marcey L Waters
Journal:  ACS Chem Biol       Date:  2019-11-01       Impact factor: 5.100

5.  MARCC (Matrix-Assisted Reader Chromatin Capture): An Antibody-Free Method to Enrich and Analyze Combinatorial Nucleosome Modifications.

Authors:  Zhangli Su; John M Denu
Journal:  Curr Protoc Mol Biol       Date:  2015-07-01

6.  Quantification of SAHA-Dependent Changes in Histone Modifications Using Data-Independent Acquisition Mass Spectrometry.

Authors:  Kimberly A Krautkramer; Lukas Reiter; John M Denu; James A Dowell
Journal:  J Proteome Res       Date:  2015-07-13       Impact factor: 4.466

7.  Monobody-mediated alteration of enzyme specificity.

Authors:  Shun-Ichi Tanaka; Tetsuya Takahashi; Akiko Koide; Satoru Ishihara; Satoshi Koikeda; Shohei Koide
Journal:  Nat Chem Biol       Date:  2015-08-31       Impact factor: 15.040

8.  The bromodomain of Gcn5 regulates site specificity of lysine acetylation on histone H3.

Authors:  Anne M Cieniewicz; Linley Moreland; Alison E Ringel; Samuel G Mackintosh; Ana Raman; Tonya M Gilbert; Cynthia Wolberger; Alan J Tackett; Sean D Taverna
Journal:  Mol Cell Proteomics       Date:  2014-08-08       Impact factor: 5.911

9.  A synthetic mimic of phosphodiesterase type 5 based on corona phase molecular recognition of single-walled carbon nanotubes.

Authors:  Juyao Dong; Michael A Lee; Ananth Govind Rajan; Imon Rahaman; Jessica H Sun; Minkyung Park; Daniel P Salem; Michael S Strano
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2020-10-14       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  Epigenetic dysregulation by nickel through repressive chromatin domain disruption.

Authors:  Cynthia C Jose; Beisi Xu; Lakshmanan Jagannathan; Candi Trac; Ramya K Mallela; Takamitsu Hattori; Darson Lai; Shohei Koide; Dustin E Schones; Suresh Cuddapah
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2014-09-22       Impact factor: 11.205

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.