Literature DB >> 23040723

Preoperative staging of invasive bladder cancer with dynamic gadolinium-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging: results from a prospective study.

Siamak Daneshmand1, Hamed Ahmadi, Ly N Huynh, Nora Dobos.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the accuracy of dynamic gadolinium-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DGE-MRI) to detect extravesical bladder cancer (BC) and lymph node-positive disease in patients with invasive BC.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: In a prospective single-center study from 2004 to 2009, patients with clinically invasive BC, who were candidates for curative surgery, underwent preoperative DGE-MRI. Radiologic T and N staging was determined by 2 MRI expert radiologists, and the interobserver agreement was calculated. The sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values, and accuracy of radiologic staging in differentiating lymph node-negative organ-confined vs nonorgan-confined BC and negative vs positive nodal disease was determined and compared with the postoperative pathologic staging as the reference standard method.
RESULTS: A total of 122 patients (72 men) with a mean age of 67.8 years were included. Pathologic examination revealed invasive BC in 80/122 (65.5%), including stage pT4 in 15/122 (12.3%), pT3 in 27/122 (22.1%), and pT2 in 38/122 (31.1%), and 27 patients (22.1%) had node-positive disease. The interobserver agreement for T and N staging according to the κ score was 0.44 and 0.49, respectively. The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of DGE-MRI in differentiating lymph node-negative organ-confined from nonorgan-confined BC was 87.5%, 47.6%, and 74% and for the detection of positive nodal disease was 40.7%, 91.5%, and 80.3%, respectively.
CONCLUSION: We have presented the results of the largest cohort of patients with invasive BC underwent preoperative DGE-MRI. Although DGE-MRI improved T and N staging of invasive BC, it is still not the ideal modality and needs a standardized protocol for interpretation of the imaging findings.
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23040723     DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2012.07.056

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urology        ISSN: 0090-4295            Impact factor:   2.649


  19 in total

Review 1.  Preoperative Imaging for Clinical Staging Prior to Radical Cystectomy.

Authors:  Cory M Hugen; Vinay Duddalwar; Siamak Daneshmand
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2016-09       Impact factor: 3.092

Review 2.  Preoperative imaging for staging bladder cancer.

Authors:  Maxim J McKibben; Michael E Woods
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 3.092

3.  Biomarkers for platinum sensitivity in bladder cancer: are we there yet?

Authors:  Nirmish Singla; Rashed A Ghandour; Ganesh V Raj
Journal:  Transl Androl Urol       Date:  2019-07

4.  Comparative sensitivity and specificity of imaging modalities in staging bladder cancer prior to radical cystectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Jack Crozier; Nathan Papa; Marlon Perera; Brian Ngo; Damien Bolton; Shomik Sengupta; Nathan Lawrentschuk
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2018-08-17       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 5.  Advances in medical imaging for the diagnosis and management of common genitourinary cancers.

Authors:  Mohammad H Bagheri; Mark A Ahlman; Liza Lindenberg; Baris Turkbey; Jeffrey Lin; Ali Cahid Civelek; Ashkan A Malayeri; Piyush K Agarwal; Peter L Choyke; Les R Folio; Andrea B Apolo
Journal:  Urol Oncol       Date:  2017-05-12       Impact factor: 3.498

6.  Surgical treatment for clinical node-positive bladder cancer patients treated with radical cystectomy without neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

Authors:  Marco Moschini; Agostino Mattei; Julian Cornelius; Shahrokh F Shariat; Paolo Dell'Oglio; Emanuele Zaffuto; Andrea Salonia; Francesco Montorsi; Alberto Briganti; Renzo Colombo; Andrea Gallina
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2018-01-24       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 7.  [The role of the vesical imaging-reporting and data system (VI-RADS) for bladder cancer diagnostics-status quo].

Authors:  V Hechler; M Rink; D Beyersdorff; M Beer; A J Beer; V Panebianco; M Pecoraro; C Bolenz; G Salomon
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2019-12       Impact factor: 0.639

Review 8.  Hysterectomy in the Urologist's Practice.

Authors:  Steven J Weissbart; Ariana L Smith
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2017-01       Impact factor: 3.092

9.  Role of Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Staging of Bladder Cancer.

Authors:  Elham Rabie; Fariborz Faeghi; Mohammad-Hossein Izadpanahi; Mohammad-Ali Dayani
Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res       Date:  2016-04-01

10.  [Functional imaging in bladder cancer].

Authors:  T Maurer; T Horn; A J Beer; M Eiber; J E Gschwend
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 0.639

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.