Literature DB >> 29368231

Surgical treatment for clinical node-positive bladder cancer patients treated with radical cystectomy without neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

Marco Moschini1,2, Agostino Mattei3, Julian Cornelius3, Shahrokh F Shariat4, Paolo Dell'Oglio5, Emanuele Zaffuto5, Andrea Salonia5, Francesco Montorsi5, Alberto Briganti5, Renzo Colombo5, Andrea Gallina5.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Growing literature supports good survival expectancies in bladder cancer (BCa) patients affected by clinical node metastases (cN+) treated with multimodal therapy. We evaluated the role of adjuvant chemotherapy in cN+BCa patients treated with radical cystectomy (RC) and pelvic lymph node dissection (PLND) without neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC).
METHODS: We evaluated a total of 192 patients with BCa and cN+. All patients were treated with RC and PLND without NAC between 2001 and 2013. Kaplan-Meier analyses and Cox regression analyses were used to assess the impact of adjuvant chemotherapy (ACT) on recurrence, cancer-specific mortality (CSM) and overall mortality (OM) after surgery.
RESULTS: Overall, 99 patients (51.6%) were found without node metastases at RC, while 18 (9.4%), 58 (30.2%) and 17 (8.9%) patients were found pN1, pN2 and pN3, respectively. With a median follow-up of 48 months, in cN+ patients we recorded 5-year recurrence, CSM and OM of 55, 53 and 51%, respectively. Overall, 36 (18.8%) patients were treated with adjuvant chemotherapy. At univariable analyses, ACT was associated with improved overall survival [Hazard ratio (HR): 0.42, confidence interval (CI) 0.20-0.86, p = 0.02) in pN+ subgroup only. These results were confirmed at multivariable analyses, where ACT was associated with improved CSS (HR: 0.45, CI 0.21-0.89, p = 0.03) and OS (HR: 0.37, CI 0.17-0.81, p = 0.01).
CONCLUSIONS: We report good survival outcomes in cN+ patients treated with RC. The use of ACT after surgery increases survival expectancies, especially in those patients with pathological node disease. Our data need to be further evaluated in prospective setting.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bladder cancer; Clinical metastases; Clinical node positive; Metastases; Radical cystectomy; Survival

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29368231     DOI: 10.1007/s00345-018-2190-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Urol        ISSN: 0724-4983            Impact factor:   4.226


  17 in total

1.  Radical cystectomy in the treatment of invasive bladder cancer: long-term results in 1,054 patients.

Authors:  J P Stein; G Lieskovsky; R Cote; S Groshen; A C Feng; S Boyd; E Skinner; B Bochner; D Thangathurai; M Mikhail; D Raghavan; D G Skinner
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2001-02-01       Impact factor: 44.544

2.  Clinical Lymphadenopathy in Urothelial Cancer: A Transatlantic Collaboration on Performance of Cross-sectional Imaging and Oncologic Outcomes in Patients Treated with Radical Cystectomy Without Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy.

Authors:  Marco Moschini; Alessandro Morlacco; Alberto Briganti; Brian Hu; Renzo Colombo; Francesco Montorsi; Igor Frank; Siamak Daneshmand; R Jeffrey Karnes
Journal:  Eur Urol Focus       Date:  2016-11-23

3.  Soft tissue surgical margin status is a powerful predictor of outcomes after radical cystectomy: a multicenter study of more than 4,400 patients.

Authors:  Giacomo Novara; Robert S Svatek; Pierre I Karakiewicz; Eila Skinner; Vincenzo Ficarra; Yves Fradet; Yair Lotan; Hendrik Isbarn; Umberto Capitanio; Patrick J Bastian; Wassim Kassouf; Hans-Martin Fritsche; Jonathan I Izawa; Derya Tilki; Colin P Dinney; Seth P Lerner; Mark Schoenberg; Bjoern G Volkmer; Arthur I Sagalowsky; Shahrokh F Shariat
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 7.450

4.  Outcome of patients with clinically node-positive bladder cancer undergoing consolidative surgery after preoperative chemotherapy: The M.D. Anderson Cancer Center Experience.

Authors:  Philip L Ho; Daniel L Willis; Jeevitha Patil; Lianchun Xiao; Stephen B Williams; Jonathan J Melquist; Karen Tart; Sahil Parikh; Jay B Shah; Scott E Delacroix; Neema Navai; Arlene Siefker-Radtke; Colin P Dinney; Louis L Pisters; Ashish M Kamat
Journal:  Urol Oncol       Date:  2015-10-01       Impact factor: 3.498

5.  Conditional survival of patients with urothelial carcinoma of the urinary bladder treated with radical cystectomy.

Authors:  Maxine Sun; Firas Abdollah; Marco Bianchi; Quoc-Dien Trinh; Shahrokh F Shariat; Claudio Jeldres; Zhe Tian; Jens Hansen; Alberto Briganti; Markus Graefen; Francesco Montorsi; Paul Perrotte; Pierre I Karakiewicz
Journal:  Eur J Cancer       Date:  2011-12-21       Impact factor: 9.162

6.  Preoperative Favorable Characteristics in Bladder Cancer Patients Cannot Substitute the Necessity of Extended Lymphadenectomy During Radical Cystectomy: A Sensitivity Curve Analysis.

Authors:  Marco Moschini; R Jeffrey Karnes; Giorgio Gandaglia; Stefano Luzzago; Paolo Dell'Oglio; Martina S Rossi; Ettore di Trapani; Giovanni La Croce; Rocco Damiano; Andrea Salonia; Shahrokh F Shariat; Francesco Montorsi; Alberto Briganti; Andrea Gallina; Renzo Colombo
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2015-12-09       Impact factor: 2.649

7.  A Multi-Institutional Analysis of Outcomes of Patients with Clinically Node Positive Urothelial Bladder Cancer Treated with Induction Chemotherapy and Radical Cystectomy.

Authors:  Kamran Zargar-Shoshtari; Homayoun Zargar; Yair Lotan; Jay B Shah; Bas W van Rhijn; Siamak Daneshmand; Philippe E Spiess; Peter C Black
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2015-07-21       Impact factor: 7.450

8.  Neoadjuvant chemotherapy plus cystectomy compared with cystectomy alone for locally advanced bladder cancer.

Authors:  H Barton Grossman; Ronald B Natale; Catherine M Tangen; V O Speights; Nicholas J Vogelzang; Donald L Trump; Ralph W deVere White; Michael F Sarosdy; David P Wood; Derek Raghavan; E David Crawford
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2003-08-28       Impact factor: 91.245

9.  Comparative Effectiveness of Treatment Strategies for Bladder Cancer With Clinical Evidence of Regional Lymph Node Involvement.

Authors:  Matthew D Galsky; Kristian Stensland; John P Sfakianos; Reza Mehrazin; Michael Diefenbach; Nihal Mohamed; Che-Kai Tsao; Paolo Boffetta; Peter Wiklund; William K Oh; Madhu Mazumdar; Bart Ferket
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2016-06-06       Impact factor: 44.544

10.  Updated 2016 EAU Guidelines on Muscle-invasive and Metastatic Bladder Cancer.

Authors:  J Alfred Witjes; Thierry Lebret; Eva M Compérat; Nigel C Cowan; Maria De Santis; Harman Maxim Bruins; Virginia Hernández; Estefania Linares Espinós; James Dunn; Mathieu Rouanne; Yann Neuzillet; Erik Veskimäe; Antoine G van der Heijden; Georgios Gakis; Maria J Ribal
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2016-06-30       Impact factor: 20.096

View more
  4 in total

1.  Hospital variation in treatment patterns and oncological outcomes for patients with muscle-invasive and metastatic bladder cancer in the Netherlands.

Authors:  Daan J Reesink; Ewoudt M W van de Garde; Paul van der Nat; Diederik M Somford; Maartje Los; Simon Horenblas; Harm H E van Melick
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2022-04-10       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 2.  Management of Clinically Regional Node-Positive Urothelial Carcinoma of the Bladder.

Authors:  Chanan Reitblat; Joaquim Bellmunt; Boris Gershman
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  2021-02-09       Impact factor: 5.075

Review 3.  Evaluation of lymph node status in patients with urothelial carcinoma-still in search of the perfect imaging modality: a systematic review.

Authors:  Michał Frączek; Hubert Kamecki; Anna Kamecka; Roman Sosnowski; Katarzyna Sklinda; Marcin Czarniecki; Leszek Królicki; Jerzy Walecki
Journal:  Transl Androl Urol       Date:  2018-10

4.  SULF2 is a novel diagnostic and prognostic marker for high-grade bladder cancer with lymphatic metastasis.

Authors:  Jianhua Huang; Cheng Li; Wentao Zhang; Fuhan Yang; Ruiliang Wang; Junfeng Zhang; Wei Li; Xudong Yao
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2021-09
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.