Literature DB >> 23039674

Multiresolution MR elastography using nonlinear inversion.

M D J McGarry1, E E W Van Houten, C L Johnson, J G Georgiadis, B P Sutton, J B Weaver, K D Paulsen.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Nonlinear inversion (NLI) in MR elastography requires discretization of the displacement field for a finite element (FE) solution of the "forward problem", and discretization of the unknown mechanical property field for the iterative solution of the "inverse problem". The resolution requirements for these two discretizations are different: the forward problem requires sufficient resolution of the displacement FE mesh to ensure convergence, whereas lowering the mechanical property resolution in the inverse problem stabilizes the mechanical property estimates in the presence of measurement noise. Previous NLI implementations use the same FE mesh to support the displacement and property fields, requiring a trade-off between the competing resolution requirements.
METHODS: This work implements and evaluates multiresolution FE meshes for NLI elastography, allowing independent discretizations of the displacements and each mechanical property parameter to be estimated. The displacement resolution can then be selected to ensure mesh convergence, and the resolution of the property meshes can be independently manipulated to control the stability of the inversion.
RESULTS: Phantom experiments indicate that eight nodes per wavelength (NPW) are sufficient for accurate mechanical property recovery, whereas mechanical property estimation from 50 Hz in vivo brain data stabilizes once the displacement resolution reaches 1.7 mm (approximately 19 NPW). Viscoelastic mechanical property estimates of in vivo brain tissue show that subsampling the loss modulus while holding the storage modulus resolution constant does not substantially alter the storage modulus images. Controlling the ratio of the number of measurements to unknown mechanical properties by subsampling the mechanical property distributions (relative to the data resolution) improves the repeatability of the property estimates, at a cost of modestly decreased spatial resolution.
CONCLUSIONS: Multiresolution NLI elastography provides a more flexible framework for mechanical property estimation compared to previous single mesh implementations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23039674      PMCID: PMC3477197          DOI: 10.1118/1.4754649

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Phys        ISSN: 0094-2405            Impact factor:   4.071


  27 in total

1.  An overlapping subzone technique for MR-based elastic property reconstruction.

Authors:  E E Van Houten; K D Paulsen; M I Miga; F E Kennedy; J B Weaver
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 4.668

2.  Magnetic resonance elastography using 3D gradient echo measurements of steady-state motion.

Authors:  J B Weaver; E E Van Houten; M I Miga; F E Kennedy; K D Paulsen
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 4.071

3.  Enhanced frequency-domain optical image reconstruction in tissues through total-variation minimization.

Authors:  K D Paulsen; H Jiang
Journal:  Appl Opt       Date:  1996-07-01       Impact factor: 1.980

4.  Magnetic resonance elastography for the noninvasive staging of liver fibrosis.

Authors:  Laurent Huwart; Christine Sempoux; Eric Vicaut; Najat Salameh; Laurence Annet; Etienne Danse; Frank Peeters; Leon C ter Beek; Jacques Rahier; Ralph Sinkus; Yves Horsmans; Bernard E Van Beers
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2008-04-04       Impact factor: 22.682

5.  Subzone based magnetic resonance elastography using a Rayleigh damped material model.

Authors:  Elijah E W Van Houten; D vR Viviers; M D J McGarry; P R Perriñez; I I Perreard; J B Weaver; K D Paulsen
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 4.071

6.  High-resolution tensor MR elastography for breast tumour detection.

Authors:  R Sinkus; J Lorenzen; D Schrader; M Lorenzen; M Dargatz; D Holz
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 3.609

7.  Magnetic resonance elastography: non-invasive mapping of tissue elasticity.

Authors:  A Manduca; T E Oliphant; M A Dresner; J L Mahowald; S A Kruse; E Amromin; J P Felmlee; J F Greenleaf; R L Ehman
Journal:  Med Image Anal       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 8.545

8.  An octahedral shear strain-based measure of SNR for 3D MR elastography.

Authors:  M D J McGarry; E E W Van Houten; P R Perriñez; A J Pattison; J B Weaver; K D Paulsen
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2011-06-08       Impact factor: 3.609

9.  Elastic moduli of normal and pathological human breast tissues: an inversion-technique-based investigation of 169 samples.

Authors:  Abbas Samani; Judit Zubovits; Donald Plewes
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2007-02-16       Impact factor: 3.609

10.  Non-invasive measurement of brain viscoelasticity using magnetic resonance elastography.

Authors:  Ingolf Sack; Bernd Beierbach; Uwe Hamhaber; Dieter Klatt; Jürgen Braun
Journal:  NMR Biomed       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 4.044

View more
  55 in total

1.  Double dissociation of structure-function relationships in memory and fluid intelligence observed with magnetic resonance elastography.

Authors:  Curtis L Johnson; Hillary Schwarb; Kevin M Horecka; Matthew D J McGarry; Charles H Hillman; Arthur F Kramer; Neal J Cohen; Aron K Barbey
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2018-01-06       Impact factor: 6.556

2.  The Relationship of Three-Dimensional Human Skull Motion to Brain Tissue Deformation in Magnetic Resonance Elastography Studies.

Authors:  Andrew A Badachhape; Ruth J Okamoto; Ramona S Durham; Brent D Efron; Sam J Nadell; Curtis L Johnson; Philip V Bayly
Journal:  J Biomech Eng       Date:  2017-05-01       Impact factor: 2.097

3.  Reliable preparation of agarose phantoms for use in quantitative magnetic resonance elastography.

Authors:  Grace McIlvain; Elahe Ganji; Catherine Cooper; Megan L Killian; Babatunde A Ogunnaike; Curtis L Johnson
Journal:  J Mech Behav Biomed Mater       Date:  2019-05-03

4.  Suitability of poroelastic and viscoelastic mechanical models for high and low frequency MR elastography.

Authors:  M D J McGarry; C L Johnson; B P Sutton; J G Georgiadis; E E W Van Houten; A J Pattison; J B Weaver; K D Paulsen
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 4.071

5.  Cardiac-gated steady-state multifrequency magnetic resonance elastography of the brain: Effect of cerebral arterial pulsation on brain viscoelasticity.

Authors:  Felix Schrank; Carsten Warmuth; Heiko Tzschätzsch; Bernhard Kreft; Sebastian Hirsch; Jürgen Braun; Thomas Elgeti; Ingolf Sack
Journal:  J Cereb Blood Flow Metab       Date:  2019-05-29       Impact factor: 6.200

6.  Viscoelasticity of subcortical gray matter structures.

Authors:  Curtis L Johnson; Hillary Schwarb; Matthew D J McGarry; Aaron T Anderson; Graham R Huesmann; Bradley P Sutton; Neal J Cohen
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2016-07-12       Impact factor: 5.038

7.  Gradient-Based Optimization for Poroelastic and Viscoelastic MR Elastography.

Authors:  Likun Tan; Matthew D J McGarry; Elijah E W Van Houten; Ming Ji; Ligin Solamen; John B Weaver; Keith D Paulsen
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2016-08-31       Impact factor: 10.048

8.  Viscoelasticity of reward and control systems in adolescent risk taking.

Authors:  Grace McIlvain; Rebecca G Clements; Emily M Magoon; Jeffrey M Spielberg; Eva H Telzer; Curtis L Johnson
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2020-04-13       Impact factor: 6.556

9.  MM-MRE: a new technique to quantify individual muscle forces during isometric tasks of the wrist using MR elastography.

Authors:  Andrea Zonnino; Daniel R Smith; Peyton L Delgorio; Curtis L Johnson; Fabrizio Sergi
Journal:  IEEE Int Conf Rehabil Robot       Date:  2019-06

Review 10.  Stiffness and Beyond: What MR Elastography Can Tell Us About Brain Structure and Function Under Physiologic and Pathologic Conditions.

Authors:  Ziying Yin; Anthony J Romano; Armando Manduca; Richard L Ehman; John Huston
Journal:  Top Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2018-10
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.