Literature DB >> 23039653

Effect of radiation induced current on the quality of MR images in an integrated linac-MR system.

Ben Burke1, K Wachowicz, B G Fallone, Satyapal Rathee.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: In integrated linac-MRI systems, the RF coils are exposed to the linac's pulsed radiation, leading to a measurable radiation induced current (RIC). This work (1) visualizes the RIC in MRI raw data and determines its effect on the MR image signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) (b) examines the effect of linac dose rate on SNR degradations, (c) examines the RIC effect on different MRI sequences, (d) examines the effect of altering the MRI sequence timing on the RIC, and (e) uses a postprocessing method to reduce the RIC signal from the MR raw data.
METHODS: MR images were acquired on the linac-MR prototype system using various imaging sequences (gradient echo, spin echo, and bSSFP), dose rates (0, 50, 100, 150, 200, and 250 MU∕min) and repetition times (TR) with the gradient echo sequence. The images were acquired with the radiation beam either directly incident or blocked from the RF coils. The SNR was calculated for each of these scenarios, showing a loss in SNR due to RIC. Finally, a postprocessing method was applied to the image k-space data in order to remove partially the RIC signal and recover some of the lost SNR.
RESULTS: The RIC produces visible spikes in the k-space data acquired with the linac's radiation incident on the RF coils. This RIC leads to a loss in imaging SNR that increases with increasing linac dose rate (15%-18% loss at 250 MU∕min). The SNR loss seen with increasing linac dose rate appears to be largely independent of the MR sequence used. Changing the imaging TR had interesting visual effects on the appearance of RIC in k-space due to the timing between the linac's pulsing and the MR sequence, but did not change the SNR loss for a given linac dose rate. The use of a postprocessing algorithm was able to remove much of the RIC noise spikes from the MR image k-space data, resulting in the recovery of a significant portion, up to 81% (Table II), of the lost image SNR.
CONCLUSIONS: The presence of RIC in MR RF coils leads to a loss of SNR which is directly related to the linac dose rate. The RIC related loss in SNR is likely to increase for systems that are able to provide larger than 250 MU∕min dose. Some of this SNR loss can be recovered through the use of a postprocessing algorithm, which removes the RIC artefact from the image k-space.

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23039653     DOI: 10.1118/1.4752422

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Phys        ISSN: 0094-2405            Impact factor:   4.071


  5 in total

Review 1.  Magnetic resonance image guidance in external beam radiation therapy planning and delivery.

Authors:  Ilamurugu Arivarasan; Chandrasekaran Anuradha; Shanmuga Subramanian; Ayyalusamy Anantharaman; Velayudham Ramasubramanian
Journal:  Jpn J Radiol       Date:  2017-06-13       Impact factor: 2.374

2.  Technical Note: A Monte Carlo study of magnetic-field-induced radiation dose effects in mice.

Authors:  Ashley E Rubinstein; Zhongxing Liao; Adam D Melancon; Michele Guindani; David S Followill; Ramesh C Tailor; John D Hazle; Laurence E Court
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 4.071

3.  MR-guidance--a clinical study to evaluate a shuttle- based MR-linac connection to provide MR-guided radiotherapy.

Authors:  Tilman Bostel; Nils H Nicolay; Jörg G Grossmann; Angela Mohr; Stefan Delorme; Gernot Echner; Peter Häring; Jürgen Debus; Florian Sterzing
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2014-01-09       Impact factor: 3.481

4.  Imaging performance of a high-field in-line magnetic resonance imaging linear accelerator with a patient rotation system for fixed-gantry radiotherapy.

Authors:  Jarryd G Buckley; Bin Dong; Gary P Liney
Journal:  Phys Imaging Radiat Oncol       Date:  2020-11-18

Review 5.  Imaging of GBM in the Age of Molecular Markers and MRI Guided Adaptive Radiation Therapy.

Authors:  Salah Dajani; Virginia B Hill; John A Kalapurakal; Craig M Horbinski; Eric G Nesbit; Sean Sachdev; Amulya Yalamanchili; Tarita O Thomas
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-10-10       Impact factor: 4.964

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.