Literature DB >> 2303954

Update on the use of distal radial bone density measurements in prediction of hip and Colles' fracture risk.

G E Lester1, J J Anderson, F A Tylavsky, W R Sutton, S S Stinnett, R A DeMasi, R V Talmage.   

Abstract

A controversy has developed around the question as to whether bone density values from the distal radius can be used to accurately predict risk of future fractures. To address this question, two separate studies were undertaken: (a) Bone density was measured in 460 healthy ambulatory women living in retirement centers in the state of North Carolina; 83% of these women were followed for up to 60 months for occurrence of minimal trauma hip and wrist fractures. Thirty-one minimal trauma fractures were reported in our study population, representing 8% of those followed. The fracture incidence density rate showed a close inverse relationship with incremental changes in bone density at the distal site. Twenty-eight of the 31 fractures were reported in women with bone density values below the 325-mg/cm2 "at risk" value. (b) Bone density values of the distal radius and the lumbar spine from 360 women (aged 18-85 years) from the Chapel Hill area were used to analyze the error in predicting individual spinal density from the distal radial density. Although the overall correlation was high (r = 0.67) and the confidence intervals were narrow, the prediction intervals were quite wide. Thus, prediction of an individual value of spine density from the distal radius density would result in a value with a range too wide to be clinically useful. We conclude that single-photon absorptiometry appears to be a useful tool for screening normal populations of asymptomatic women for prediction of hip or Colles' fracture risk even though it has limited usefulness in prediction of spinal fracture risk or individual values for spinal density.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2303954     DOI: 10.1002/jor.1100080210

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Orthop Res        ISSN: 0736-0266            Impact factor:   3.494


  6 in total

1.  [Is use of the fixateur externe no longer indicated for the treatment of unstable radial fracture in the elderly?].

Authors:  S Ochman; U Frerichmann; N Armsen; M J Raschke; R H Meffert
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 1.000

2.  Geometric variables from DXA of the radius predict forearm fracture load in vitro.

Authors:  E R Myers; A T Hecker; D S Rooks; J A Hipp; W C Hayes
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  1993-03       Impact factor: 4.333

3.  Correlations between photon absorption properties and failure load of the distal radius in vitro.

Authors:  E R Myers; E A Sebeny; A T Hecker; T A Corcoran; J A Hipp; S L Greenspan; W C Hayes
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  1991-10       Impact factor: 4.333

4.  [Quality of care after distal radius fracture in Germany. Results of a fracture register of 1,201 elderly patients].

Authors:  R Smektala; H G Endres; B Dasch; F Bonnaire; H J Trampisch; L Pientka
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 1.000

5.  Age-related differences in cross-sectional geometry of the forearm bones in healthy women.

Authors:  M L Bouxsein; K H Myburgh; M C van der Meulen; E Lindenberger; R Marcus
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  1994-02       Impact factor: 4.333

6.  Meta-analysis of how well measures of bone mineral density predict occurrence of osteoporotic fractures.

Authors:  D Marshall; O Johnell; H Wedel
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1996-05-18
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.